Hello Keepers of SpamAssassin Knowledge,

I've been lurking on this list for years and never had a question pop up until today. About a week ago I said, "enough is enough" regarding the amount of spam I've been receiving so I've been doing some upgrades. As such, I recently upgraded to SA 3.4 and did the recommended "sa-learn --clear" to clean out the database. I had a huge pile of recent spam and ham so I repopulated the database with those. Afterwards, here is what my "sa-learn --dump magic" looked like:

0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version
0.000          0      35575          0  non-token data: nspam
0.000          0       1870          0  non-token data: nham
0.000          0     180984          0  non-token data: ntokens
0.000          0 1314919780          0  non-token data: oldest atime
0.000          0 1398209850          0  non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime 0.000 0 1398228671 0 non-token data: last expiry atime 0.000 0 691200 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta 0.000 0 2166321 0 non-token data: last expire reduction count

Yes, I had that much spam stored up. That sa-learn took several hours. But on to my question; I have been extra careful to note what has been slipping by the filter and here is what I've seen over the past two days:

3.299 (***) BAYES_00,FORGED_RELAY_MUA_TO_MX
3.92 (***) BAYES_00 ,FREEMAIL_FROM ,RDNS_NONE,TBIRD_SUSP_MIME_BDRY,T_HTML_ATTACH,T_OBFU_HTML_ATTACH
-1 () BAYES_00
0.279 () BAD_CREDIT,BAYES_00
-0.988 () BAYES_00,HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE,HTML_MESSAGE,T_REMOTE_IMAGE
3.299 (***) BAYES_00,FORGED_RELAY_MUA_TO_MX
-0.988 () BAYES_00,HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE,HTML_MESSAGE,T_REMOTE_IMAGE
-0.979 () BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_HTML_ATTACH,T_OBFU_HTML_ATTACH
0.436 () BAYES_00,DIET_1,HELO_MISC_IP,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE 0.436 () BAYES_00,DIET_1,HELO_MISC_IP,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE

The thing that is common is BAYES_00 on all of these. It's the standard -1 score. Did I do something horrible with my installation to allow this sort of crud to slip through? Isn't that when Bayes things that the mail isn't spam? Look at some of the other rules that are hitting. I cannot figure out why BAYES_00 would hit on these.

Thanks in advance.

Oh, this is a sendmail -> mimedefang -> spamassassin/clamav/razor installation. Any recommendations on additional plugins to consider and/or SARE-like channels to subscribe to would be greatly appreciated.

Brian

Reply via email to