Re: Autolearn: works from command-line, not via milter

2006-01-16 Thread Jim Maul
Don Levey wrote: Don Levey wrote: Don Levey wrote: Jim Maul wrote: Failed means it didnt work for some reason. No means it simply didnt even try to autolearn (score wasnt high enough, spam/ham threshold not reached, etc.) In short, failed points to a potential problem, whereas no doesnt. -J

RE: Autolearn: works from command-line, not via milter

2006-01-16 Thread Don Levey
Don Levey wrote: > Don Levey wrote: >> Jim Maul wrote: >>> >>> Failed means it didnt work for some reason. No means it simply >>> didnt even try to autolearn (score wasnt high enough, spam/ham >>> threshold not reached, etc.) In short, failed points to a >>> potential problem, whereas no doesnt.

RE: Autolearn: works from command-line, not via milter

2006-01-16 Thread Don Levey
Don Levey wrote: > Jim Maul wrote: >> >> Failed means it didnt work for some reason. No means it simply didnt >> even try to autolearn (score wasnt high enough, spam/ham threshold >> not reached, etc.) In short, failed points to a potential problem, >> whereas no doesnt. >> >> -Jim > > That I und

Re: Autolearn: works from command-line, not via milter

2006-01-16 Thread Jim Maul
Don Levey wrote: Jim Maul wrote: Do you have a copy of a message that causes the autolearn=failed? I'd run it through SA with debug enabled to see why its failing..permissions of the bayes files are a likely cause. It looks to be failing only when it actually tries to do the autolearn so i'd c

RE: Autolearn: works from command-line, not via milter

2006-01-16 Thread Don Levey
Jim Maul wrote: > Don Levey wrote: >> Don Levey wrote: >> >>> Messages coming in and autoscanned via spamass-milter/spamd all fail >>> autolearn. To pick one example from this list (full headers >>> available if it will help): >>> >>> >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 >

Re: Autolearn: works from command-line, not via milter

2006-01-16 Thread Jim Maul
Don Levey wrote: Don Levey wrote: Messages coming in and autoscanned via spamass-milter/spamd all fail autolearn. To pick one example from this list (full headers available if it will help): X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 X-Sp

RE: Autolearn: works from command-line, not via milter

2006-01-16 Thread Don Levey
Don Levey wrote: > > Messages coming in and autoscanned via spamass-milter/spamd all fail > autolearn. To pick one example from this list (full headers > available if it will help): > > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 > autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 > X-Spam-Che

Autolearn: works from command-line, not via milter

2006-01-16 Thread Don Levey
I just moved/upgraded my home server this weekend, leading to less hair on my head and more ulcers elsewhere. While I've worked my way through many problems in the past few days, this one seems to be eluding me and googling, archives, etc haven't yet helped me. Here's the scoop: Messages coming i