, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Is there still a reason for this update channel?
90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0?
^
20_freemail.cf and
t;> On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >>>>> Is there still a reason for this update channel?
> >>>>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 6:19 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:12 +0100, Ye
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:12 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >> Is there still a reason for this update channel?
> >>
> >> 90_sare_fr
On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Is there still a reason for this update channel?
90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0?
20_freemail.cf and 20_freemail_domains.cf
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> Is there still a reason for this update channel?
>
> 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>
> Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0?
20_freemail.cf and 20_freemail_domains.cf ?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\
Is there still a reason for this update channel?
90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0?
Is there still a reason for this update channel?
90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0?