>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch
>From: Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:26:08 -0600
...
>> The above patch certainly doesn't seem to be in 3.0.2. However the
>> patch applies cleanly w
Dennis Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
01/04/2005 10:23:02 AM:
> >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >Subject: SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch
> >From: Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:33:12 -0600
> >
> >Does SA 3.0.
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch
>From: Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:33:12 -0600
>
>Does SA 3.0.2 contain the test patch for low memory machines?
>Probably not, since nothing was mentioned in th
Does SA 3.0.2 contain the test patch
for low memory machines? Probably not, since nothing was mentioned
in the release note. That being the case, can the existing patch
be used as is for 3.0.2 or would it have to be modified for 3.0.2?
Thanks
Andy