Re: SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch

2005-01-04 Thread Dennis Davis
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch >From: Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:26:08 -0600 ... >> The above patch certainly doesn't seem to be in 3.0.2. However the >> patch applies cleanly w

Re: SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch

2005-01-04 Thread Andy Jezierski
Dennis Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/04/2005 10:23:02 AM: > >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > >Subject: SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch > >From: Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:33:12 -0600 > > > >Does SA 3.0.

Re: SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch

2005-01-04 Thread Dennis Davis
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch >From: Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:33:12 -0600 > >Does SA 3.0.2 contain the test patch for low memory machines? >Probably not, since nothing was mentioned in th

SA 3.0.2 and low memory patch

2005-01-03 Thread Andy Jezierski
Does SA 3.0.2 contain the test patch for low memory machines?  Probably not, since nothing was mentioned in the release note.  That being the case, can the existing patch be used as is for 3.0.2 or would it have to be modified for 3.0.2? Thanks Andy