Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> Smfabac wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:20:06 -0800 (PST):
>
>> So, does the documentation on sa-learn indicate that there is
>> a size limit on the message to be processed?
>
> Why not check yourself?
>
> Kai
>
> --
> Get you
John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
>
>> Is there a message size limit for sa-learn?
>
> Yes, there is, and sadly sa-learn does not explicitly tell you a message
> has been skipped because it's too large.
>
> If there's a non
Charles Gregory wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
>> Now that we're all on the same page. How do I find out why sa-learn
>> is not processing the legal not-spam file? To re-cap, "sa-learn --spam
>> --mbox isspam" works but "sa-le
RW-15 wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:51:12 +
> RW wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:17:54 -0800 (PST)
>> smfabac wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Mark,
>> >
>> > On UNIX any file is a mbox file if it contains mail me
ut when I run the above command to
>> the directory containg mbox it always fails with the '0 messages
>> examined' error.
>
> If your messages are in a mbox *file*, you need an option --mbox,
> not --dir .
>
> smfabac wrote:
>> I am having a similar problem
tonjg wrote:
>
> raq550 server
> OS: strongbolt2
> spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.5-1.el4
>
> I'm trying to run:
> sa-learn --spam --showdots --dir /path/to...mbox
> but it fails with:
> 'Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 messages examined)'
> my spam mail is in a file called mbox but when I run the
Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>>> Is there a document regarding the interpretation of
>>>
>>>
> sa-learn --dump magic
>>> config: could not find site rules directory
>>>
>>> 0.000 03 0 non-token data: bayes db
>>> version
>>> 0.000 0 261451
