>> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:26:08 +
>> From: andrew.he...@aaisp.net.uk
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Detecting very recently registered domain names
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:02:39 -0500
>> Joe Quinn wrote:
>>
>>> We are notic
Hi,
A happy new year to you all.
I'm seeing a lot of spam containing the following pattern of headers:
X-MimeOLE: Produced by SwiftMailer 3.3.1_4
X-mid: What looks like a message ID=
X-Mailer: AC Mailer
The thing that first got my attention was the SwiftMailer version, which
is pretty old.
I'v
> From: Martin Gregorie [mailto:mar...@gregorie.org]
> Sent: 12 June 2012 16:37
> To: Spamassassin users list
> Subject: Is this a new typoe of URI obfuscation?
>
> Today I got a piece of spam carrying the URL chasovik.it.gg as its
> payload. I was intrigued because I didn't think .gg was a valid
>> has anybody managed the plugin to run with SA 3.3.1 ?
> using the 3.2.5 with sa 3.3.1 works for me :)
Likewise here.
Mup.
Guys,
Thanks for time and effort on this.
Consider this matter closed.
Mup.
I realise that my English isn't that good, but I think what I've written is
pretty clear.
I never disputed the fact the rules were there. If you look at my original
post, I say 'turned off', not 'removed'.
I never said I wanted them for Meta rules, I asked for best way to turn then
back on aga
> here i do
> #
> # meta to hit on both ABUSE and POSTMASTER missing on sending domain
> #
> meta RFC_ABUSE_POST (__DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE && __DNS_FROM_RFC_POST &&
> !USER_IN_BLACKLIST && !USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST && !HAM_LISTED_LOCAL)
> describe RFC_ABUSE_POST Meta: both abuse and postmaster missing
> These sub-BL listings still have been used in 3.1.x, no need to dig
into
> the ancient age of 2.5x. As you said yourself, "a release or two ago".
> Why do you now bring up that version?
That's the last version I did anything serious with, and version used to
produce the system I'm presently rep
ing with risk is that 'mileage varies' ... I can live with it in
context of how I wish to use lists, but thanks for pointing that out.
Thanks for your time in replying, and further appols for annoying you so much.
Si.
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@ru
Guys,
A release or two ago, default inclusion of Postmaster and Abuse lists at
RFC-Ignorant.org were turned off (some will say for good reason).
What is easiest way to turn them back on again?
Thanks
Mup.
o.uk, users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, 14 January, 2009, 2:23 PM
How's it working for you, so far?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:12, Paul Griffith wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:28:42 -0500, si wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> I'm sure you're as sad
Guys,
I'm sure you're as sad as I am re- temporary suspension of the brilliant
services offered by Steve Basford and is helpers at Sane Security. In a sick
kind of way, the 'bad guys' are acknowledging the work these guys have done by
DOSing them, but that doesn't help much with the daily grin
12 matches
Mail list logo
