>>>
> On 2022‑02‑14 at 12:31:18 UTC‑0500 (Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:31:18 ‑0500)
> joea‑ lists
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Nutshell: I want to add "Reply‑to: (some address)" to messages
without
>> same.
>>
>> While it seems feasible to do
>>>
> "joea‑ lists" writes:
>
>> Nutshell: I want to add "Reply‑to: (some address)" to messages
without same.
>
>
> Please do explain why. It sounds like a clear standards violation
> because Reply‑To may only be set by the sender.
&
Nutshell: I want to add "Reply-to: (some address)" to messages without same.
While it seems feasible to do this in postfix, I wanted to explore doing it
with minimal fuss in SAm or if a FILTER or MILTER might be required.
So far I've only found "Basic Message Tagging Options".
joe a.
After a long outage due to weather, a restart found spamd not running (timed
out on startup, a story for later),
and a lot of spam got through.
Now that it is running, should I re-submit these dozens or hundreds of emails
to allow them to be properly
classified, drop them in "missed SPAM" or ju
> On 2022‑02‑03 16:50, joea‑ lists wrote:
>> SA version 3.4.5
>
> old version, stable is 3.4.6 now
Unless there is a pressing reason to update right away, I prefer to
wait for the vendor
supplied package to update. But that is not a hard rule for me.
>> Since y
>> On Thu, 2022‑02‑03 at 10:50 ‑0500, joea‑ lists wrote:
SA version 3.4.5
>>>
>>> Since yesterday 2/2/22 (gasp!) . . . I've noticed an up tick in
missed
>>> SPAM from .co domain. Though obvious SPAM
>>> weight loss, phish, "personals"
> On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:50 -0500, joea- lists wrote:
>> SA version 3.4.5
>>
>> Since yesterday 2/2/22 (gasp!) . . . I've noticed an up tick in missed
>> SPAM from .co domain. Though obvious SPAM
>> weight loss, phish, "personals", they are scori
SA version 3.4.5
Since yesterday 2/2/22 (gasp!) . . . I've noticed an up tick in missed SPAM
from .co domain. Though obvious SPAM
weight loss, phish, "personals", they are scoring rather low.
Added a custom rule for that domain, which should deal with it, but wondering
if I missed some chan
