>>> > "joea‑ lists" <joea‑li...@j4computers.com> writes: > >> Nutshell: I want to add "Reply‑to: (some address)" to messages without same. > > > Please do explain why. It sounds like a clear standards violation > because Reply‑To may only be set by the sender. > >> While it seems feasible to do this in postfix, I wanted to explore >> doing it with minimal fuss in SAm or if a FILTER or MILTER might be >> required. >> >> So far I've only found "Basic Message Tagging Options". > > What you are wanting to do does not seem related to spamassassin's > mission, so I think it is probably best to avoid trying to make > spamassassin doin git.
The reason has to do with "reply" and "reply to all" with the email client/system I am using and prefer to continue using for now. Being subscribed to several lists, I find some variation between them regarding the headers they provide and how my "reply" feature works. Those that provide "Reply-to: somelist" act as expected and place the list address in the To: field. Those that do not (users@spamassassin.apache.org included) find the address of the poster rather than the list in the To: field. While this is not a new issue, I do occasionally fail to correct the address issue and an email goes astray. ' I'm aware that "modern" clients can deal with this and there are more "practical" solutions, but I view this as an opportunity for "exercise" and perverse amusement. Does not appear to be something that can or should be done in SA, just exploring possible avenues, or, abandoning the idea completely. joe a.
