7;tip of the hat' towards
diversity.
Judy.
From: Bill Cole
Sent: 10 July 2020 21:21
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PEOPLE RUNNING TRUNK re: [Bug 7826] Improve
language around whitelist/blacklist and master/slave
On 10 Ju
$0.02 from a woman of colour ...
I personally find stuff like this just a little bit patronising ... more of a
matter of kicking the real problem into the weeds than actually doing anything
practical to 'fix' it.
Right up there with Mercedes decision to paint their $100 Million F1 cars black.
a domain name renewal.
On 5/23/2020 2:33 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 09:55, hospice admin
>>> wrote:
>>> > Looks like DCC/Rhyolite has stopped working. First noticed problems
>>> > around 19:30 last night UK time.
>&g
Hi Gang,
Looks like DCC/Rhyolite has stopped working. First noticed problems around
19:30 last night UK time.
Problem seems to be that DNS for dcc-servers.net has gone away. Have checked
with the likes of mxtoolbox and intoDNS and they appear to agree.
When I do a 'whois' for the domain I noti
ianne Skoll wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:27:52 +0000
> > hospice admin wrote:
> >
> > > text = "v=spf1 exists:%{i}._spf.xyz.com ~all"
> > > What I'd like to do is turn this into an RBL check, but
> > > eval:check_rbl('Evil-E
Hi Team,
There's a particularly annoying ESP bugging us. Their clients always include a
reference to them in their SPF records, which look something like this:
text = "v=spf1 exists:%{i}._spf.xyz.com ~all"
So, if a message is dropped from 1.2.3.4
nslookup 1.2.3.4._spf.xyz.com
returns
Thanks.
From: Kevin Golding
Sent: 27 July 2017 14:41
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::EmailBL??
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:28:06 +0100, hospice admin
wrote:
> the above plugin doesn't seem to be distributed
Hi,
the above plugin doesn't seem to be distributed with the version of
SpamAssassin I'm running:
spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.4.0
running on Perl version 5.16.3
Also, I can't find mention of a download location anywhere.
Am I right in thinking this was an experiment that
Guys,
I've been beating my head against a problem for a couple of days now ... maybe
someone can point me in the right direction ...?
I'm running SA 3.4.1 on Fedora 22. I think this problem started happening when
I upgraded from 3.4.0 on Fedora 21. In both cases, SA is running from within
MimeD
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:43:37 +0200
> From: axb.li...@gmail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advice re- SA 3.4.0
>
> On 06/07/2014 01:33 PM, hospice admin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:22:13 +
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:22:13 +0200
> From: axb.li...@gmail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advice re- SA 3.4.0
>
> On 06/07/2014 01:09 PM, hospice admin wrote:
> > I was wondering about this one and had put it to one side until I had
>
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 12:49:32 +0200
> From: axb.li...@gmail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advice re- SA 3.4.0
>
> On 06/07/2014 12:19 PM, hospice admin wrote:
> > Just wondering if anyone had any advice along the lines "you really
&g
Hi Team,
Ive finally completed the upgrade of all my mail servers from FC18 + SA 3.3.2 +
Perl 5.15.3 to FC20 + SA 3.4.0 + Perl 5.18.2. I run SA from within MineDefang
2.74 in both cases.
I've simply moved across all the rules and plug-ins I used 3.3.2 to 3.4.0, and
during our beta testin
> Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 17:13:24 -0700
> From: jdeb...@garlic.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mystery SpamWare
>
> On Thu, 22 May 2014 18:23:48 +0100
> hospice admin wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>
Hi Team,
All of a sudden I've started noticing a lot of spam coming in with some fairly
unique headers like this:
x-track-version: 4
x-track-source: notifire_XXX
x-track-spooler-id:
x-track-spooler-split-id:
x-track-spooler-segment-id:
x-render: render-
Precedence: bulk
x-trac
Hi Team,
I was wondering what folks were doing with SPF_FAIL , TO_EQ_FM_SPF_FAIL and
TO_EQ_FM_DOM_SPF_FAIL these days?
I personally have never seen an FP with any, but understand from the reading
I've done that some people do.
My approach has always been to combine with DCC/Pyzor/Razor h
> From: hospice...@outlook.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Detecting very recently registered domain names
> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 13:45:07 +
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:26:08 +
>> F
> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:26:08 +
> From: andrew.he...@aaisp.net.uk
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Detecting very recently registered domain names
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:02:39 -0500
> Joe Quinn wrote:
>
>> We are noticing a lot
> From: lcon...@go2france.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: dns*.registrar-servers.com as a rogue registrar?
> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 13:15:24 -0500
>
>
> Nearly all of the .pw domains have their authoritative NS at
> dns*.registrar-servers.com.
>
> that registrar and few othe
http://www.nominet.org.uk/whoweare/structure/agm/board-election
It would be great if someone from our community (ideally wiser them me), could
get elected.
Judy.
> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 16:34:48 +0200
> From: axb.li...@gmail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: .pw / Palau URL domains in spam
>
> On 05/01/2013 04:28 PM, hospice admin wrote:
> > I don't care what some folks are saying about .pw, compared
I don't care what some folks are saying about .pw, compared to Nominet they
totally rock.
When was the last time anyone saw Nominet suspend a .UK spammer?
Judy
> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 06:58:41 -0700
> From: dones...@directi.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: .pw / Palau URL do
> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:13:30 -0400
> From: b...@indietorrent.org
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Seminar Spam
>
>
>
> On 4/24/2013 12:12 PM, hospice admin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we're having problems with an outfit
Hi,
we're having problems with an outfit called 'Bite Sized Seminars' in the UK,
who seem to be sending mail out through another company called 'Communicado'. A
quick google suggests we aren't the only ones.
We have developed a number of rules that identify their mail by looking for
their phone
24 matches
Mail list logo
