Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on 08/23/2010 04:50:39
PM:
>
> Looking at it more deeply, nawilliams.com has three nameservers (but
only 2
> delegations from .com), where two return -all and one returns ~all:
>
> % dig spf nawilliams.com @beulah.zootsplace.com.
> nawilliams.com. 30
Benny Pedersen wrote on 08/23/2010 02:45:07 PM:
> > The domain in question is nawilliams.com. This is the SPF record:
> >
> > "v=spf1 mx ptr ~all"
>
> ptr is unsafe to use in spf
>
> ~all means domain owner dont know what thay are doing
I figured as much. What I don't understand is why this
Michael Scheidell wrote on 08/23/2010
11:59:06 AM:
> you will need to provide more information.
>
> post ALL the headers, and state which one is the last untrusted received
> header.
Here is what I see in the Exim reject log. I'm not sure quite what you
mean by "last untrusted received hea
I'm having a problem with SPF soft fail detection for a particular domain
that I cannot explain. Emails are being rejected for the domain because
emails are being hit with the SPF_FAIL rule, but according to the SPF
record, they should be hit with the SPF_SOFTFAIL rule.
The domain in question
