hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:13:22PM +0200, Matthias Keller told us:
> Using amavisd-new...
actually, with amavisd-new, you can treat virus names in a special
way via regexes, so that it doesn't get recognized as a virus, but
instead you can add extra points to the spamassassin score.
This fea
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:58:27AM -0500, Dallas Engelken told us:
> >do you have network tests enabled, especially URIBL?? If so it might
> >be due to the recent DDOS on uribl.com, which causes the scans to
> >take longer due to DNS timeout??
>
> There should be no dns timeouts for URIBL currentl
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:26:38PM +0200, Devilish Entity told us:
> On 6/8/07, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:15:35PM -0700, geist_ wrote:
> >> One AMD Unknown 1300MHz processor, 2601.92 total bogomips, 95M RAM
> >[...]
> >> Any help should be useful
Hi Ram,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 05:05:57PM +0530, ram told us:
> The securitysage rhsbl has been giving too many false positives
> since morning today,
>
> Anyone else seen this
not personally, but you might want to take a look at this posting
earlier this day on the amavis-user mailing list:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:46:32PM -0800, John D. Hardin told us:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > > for mangled viagra and other stuff ..is there any simple rule??
> > > such as following text...
> >
> > Mangled rules are never simple rules.
>
> I have a perl script that will t
Hi Steven,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:56:18AM -0600, Steven Stern told us:
> after sa-update runs, restart spamassassin and it will use the new rules
> in /var/lib/spamassassin.
>
> I have this as a cron job:
>
> 30 3 * * * sa-update && spamassassin --lint && /etc/init.d/spamassassin
> restart
Hi Stuart,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:56:25PM -0600, Stuart Johnston told us:
> I don't have a real answer except to say that I have the same problem
> behind a PIX, so it is not just you.
nice to see I'm at least not the only person with this problem ;-)
I just took a look at pix NAT configur
Hi Mark, hi list,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:37:21PM +0100, Mark Martinec told us:
> Not so.
>
> - p0f and p0f-analyzer.pl need to be running on your MX host,
>
> - spamd with a plugin (or amavisd-new with its own client code
> to query p0f-analyzer.pl) can be running on another host.
>
> The c
