On Tuesday 20 November 2007 19:25:27 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Both, the rewritten Subject (see [DEL]) and the X-TUD-*-SpamScore [1]
> header should be sufficient on it's own to identify a previously
> encapsulated mail. Based on that, just treat the mail differently,
> un-wrapping if need be. I
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:21:12AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>>> machines. Is there a way to detect (in ways of a script) that a mail has
>>> been
>>> processed by report safe, or yet better, a done way to undo it? I've heard
>>> sa-learn does it, so i'd
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Oh, also, if mails are coming in w/ "X-Spam-Status: Yes" or whatever,
> you could always choose to just block those mails via the MTA/etc.
>
> IMO, if someone else is telling you that the mail is spam, why bother
> accepting it?
>
Because i don't trust the other servers
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 17:59:39 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Well, yes and no. "-d" only removed 1 level of encapsulation. If you have
> a multiply-encapsulated message, you need to run the unencapsulator
> multiple times. :)
>
> As far as your markup versus their markup ... It generally should
Sent before with the wrong from address ... sorry if this comes through
twice.
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:21:12AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>>> machines. Is there a way to detect (in ways of a script) that a mail has
>>> been
>>> processed by report safe,
Hi,
I'm kind of annoyed because there are, for a few of my email addresses,
several spamassassins at work, and they all use report_safe. On the final
machine (mine), there's a spamassassin running too. So, to prevent a message
from ending up in my mail client encapsulated in 5 spamassassin "env
Hi,
i have a mail server that I manage, using SpamAssassin 3.1.7.
Unfortunately some mail (for example mail going to my university
account) gets filtered by other SpamAssassin instances. If they detected
spam, the mail gets rewritten and the original mail is inside the
attachment. Now many of
