At one time I tried to "do it all" in Postfix. It's all or nothing binary
operation of its Spam rules drove me to find another solution to Spam;
SpamAssassin. Now a triggered rule only adds to a Spamminess value, and
won't kill the message. I ultimately took almost all the rules out of
Postfix b
PMJI, but how do you know you exceeded the token threshold? What command do
you run, and what statistic do you look for?
<>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 5:43 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subj
Title: OT: razor...compilation problems
I got the same error when I did a make test. I just
ignored it and did the make install. Haven't tested it, as I had some
conflicts with the perl libraries. I found I had multiple versions of some
of them spread around. I spent some time cleaning th
I forget to be paranoid and suspicious some times. :(
<>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:12 AM
> To: Smart,Dan; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Image
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:18 AM
> To: Matt Kettler
> Cc: Smart,Dan; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Image Composition Analysis
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 07:25:45PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > Yes, but DCC is still more reliable and faster. (I
Search for the .pm and .so components of the installed packages. I found
that I had more than one version saved in different perl library locations.
When I did a locate DNS.pm, etc, I found them, then made sure I was left
with one copy of the most recent version. That fixed my SPAMD problem
(actu
2004 2:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Image Composition Analysis
>
> On Tuesday 30 November 2004 01:27 pm, Smart,Dan wrote:
>
> > Catching image only E-mail with pornographic images is
> really difficult.
> > My users are offended when they get
I believe a SPAMD problem has be pinpointed with SMP kernels using
hyperthreading. Look through the bug list.
<>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Philbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:59 AM
> To: Dimitry Peisakhov
> Cc: 'users@spamassassi
r 30, 2004 5:12 PM
> To: Smart,Dan; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Image Composition Analysis
>
> At 05:27 PM 11/30/2004, Smart,Dan wrote:
> >Messagelabs made a big deal of their option of using First
> 4 Internet's
> >Image Composition A
t: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 4:53 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Image Composition Analysis
>
> Smart,Dan said:
> > Messagelabs made a big deal of their option of using First 4
> > Internet's Image Composition Analysis tool to detect pornogr
Messagelabs made a
big deal of their option of using First 4 Internet's Image Composition Analysis
tool to detect pornographic images. Is anyone in the open source world
working on something similar.
Catching image only
E-mail with pornographic images is really difficult. My users are of
Vickie:
I've had the same problem. It has to do with procmail and the -t 60.
The spamc -t 60 doesn't actually kill the spamd process, it simply cuts the
connection between spamc and spamd.
The normal action of procmail and spamc is to deliver if there is a spamc
error.
This has to be turned off b
For what its worth, the init.pre file is critical.
The /root/.cpan/ Is were the source is downloaded and compiled by CPAN.
The "make install" that CPAN automatically does puts all the user .cf files
in the /etc/mail/spamassassin directory. This is where the init.pre if
found. If its missing
4 2:26 PM
> To: Smart,Dan
> Cc: Spamassassin talk list
> Subject: Re: SA 3.0.1, still memory issues...
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Smart,Dan writes:
> > A little off topic, but how did you compile your perl?
> Did you tur
A little off topic, but how did you compile your perl? Did you turn on
threading? Shared libperl?
Does SA use threads?
TIA
<>
> -Original Message-
> From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 12:50 PM
> To: Spamassassin talk list
> Subje
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott A Crosby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:23 PM
>
> We should be a bit more careful than this --- require that a
> new URL has to resolve to the same IP address as, say, at
> least 3 other SURBL entries before be
> -Original Message-
> From: Smart,Dan
> To: Chris Santerre; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors)
>
> I then did a
> Perl -d:Dprof /usr/bin/spamassassin < testfile And then ran
> the profiler as descri
day, September 09, 2004 3:07 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors)
> >
> >
> >On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 7:12:26 AM, Smart,Dan
> Smart,Dan wrote:
> >> What I found was that the Textcat language rules
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Saklad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 12:02 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Usability. Spamassassin.
>
> Thank you for your interest in the usability of the
> spamassassin
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 7:12 PM
> To: Smart,Dan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mass-check errors
> TextCat looks for $rulesdir/languages, which via your above
&g
I took out the language options, and it runs standalone. With debug:
perl -d:DProf ./mass-check -c=/etc/mail/spamassassin/test --net --mbox
/var/spool/procmail/tempfail
I get:
Segmentation fault
Any suggestions?
<>
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 3:56 PM
> To: Smart,Dan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mass-check errors
> Hrm. In theory, it'll only happen if you specify ok_languages
When I try to run mass-check on an MBOX file I get the following
Use of uninitialized value in open at
/root/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.64/masses/../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Tex
tCat.pm line 63.
cannot open languages: No such file or directory
What do I need to do to bypass this error.
I'm
> -Original Message-
> From: Smart,Dan
> Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 8:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Spamd abnormal handling of spamc timeout.
>
> After testing, I find that when 'spamc' times out (-t), it
> breaks its c
eout of 'spamc'
tell 'spamd' to quit? Is this a bug or a feature?
<>
> -Original Message-
> From: Smart,Dan
> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 3:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Spamd abnormal handling of spamc timeout.
>
>
> RH7.3,Postfix 2.1, procmail w/ SpamAssassin.
> Using type 1 after-queue filtering.
>
> ===
RH7.3,Postfix 2.1, procmail w/ SpamAssassin.
Using type 1 after-queue filtering.
===
Executing in master.cf:
procmail unix - n n - 12 pipe
flags=R user=filter
argv=procmail -Y -f- -t -m /etc/mail/procmail/procmailrc ${sender}
${re
26 matches
Mail list logo
