nning RHEL8 with spamassassin 3.4.6 - so the BLOCKED tests
are not there - but I'm not being blocked from what I can see, so that's not an
issue for now.
Simon.
On Saturday, April 05, 2025 11:57 AEST, Greg Troxel wrote:
"Simon Wilson via users" writes:
> OK, back
Hi Noel,
With upstream RBLs and postscreen, unbound setup for caching resolution, etc.,
once SA is invoked on my system it is scanning real mail which is going to be
delivered, at which point out-of-the-box-spamassassin does 3 x lookups to lists
which appear to count against the Validity limit
00 sets of queries a day
to stay inside total 10,000 in 30 days free. I'd need about 25,000 a month I
guess.
What's the consensus on how to manage this within spamassassin?
Simon.
On Saturday, April 05, 2025 09:39 AEST, "Simon Wilson via users"
wrote:
Hi Andre
Hi Andrew
Thank you, and Tom Bartel (on the mailop list), for replying.
* BTW I've never signed up for anything with Validity other than creating an
account at validity.com/zone to validate my IPs (horrible website trying to
find that again to check yesterday). * I'm a personal not corporate
Hi list,
I've received an email from validity.com:Reminder – you’re currently receiving
the paid edition of Validity’s Zone File Access (at no cost), but as of May
1st, 2025, we will no longer be able to provide this experience for free. If
you wish to continue receiving IP Reputation, Validity
On Thursday, July 04, 2024 02:01 AEST, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 15:54:
>
> > header AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS eval:check_authres_result('dkim', 'pass')
> > header USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST eval:check_for_dkim_whitelist_f
On Thursday, July 04, 2024 01:11 AEST, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 2024-07-03 at 10:19:28 UTC-0400 (Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:19:28 +1000)
> Simon Wilson via users
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > On 03.07.24 23:54, Simon Wilson via users wrote:
> >> Simon Wilson via users
Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 14:56:
> Do I also need to disable the normal SA DKIM plugin evaluation, i.e.
> trusting my upstream authres_trusted_authserv only?
both works in paralel, so no need to disable, best results came from
both enabled
its up to you to ad
On 03.07.24 23:54, Simon Wilson via users wrote:
>Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 14:56:
>> Do I also need to disable the normal SA DKIM plugin evaluation, i.e.
>> trusting my upstream authres_trusted_authserv only?
>
>both works in paralel, so no need to disab
Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 14:56:
> Do I also need to disable the normal SA DKIM plugin evaluation, i.e.
> trusting my upstream authres_trusted_authserv only?
both works in paralel, so no need to disable, best results came from
both enabled
its up to you to ad
Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 14:13:
> I don't think SA 3.4.6 on RH8 has AuthRes plugin:
take it from spamassassin trunc, this plugin works on 3.4.6 aswell, but
was not released or tested on it, i have verify it does work
#!/bin/sh
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/r
On Wednesday, July 03, 2024 22:06 AEST, "Simon Wilson via users"
wrote:
Dave Funk skrev den 2024-07-03 09:29:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, Simon Wilson via users wrote:
> You say "passing SPF and DKIM" however in the SA rules report it
> clearly says:
> D
Dave Funk skrev den 2024-07-03 09:29:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, Simon Wilson via users wrote:
> You say "passing SPF and DKIM" however in the SA rules report it
> clearly says:
> DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_INVALID=0.1
>
> So eventho you think 'passed DKIM' SA c
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, Simon Wilson via users wrote:
> Does whitelist_auth work on From header, or Return-Path? Reason I ask:
>
>
>
> I have two emails from “support .at. wasabi.com”. Due to their emails usually
> triggering KAM rules I have (in
> /etc/mail/
Running SA 3.4.6 on RH8.
Does whitelist_auth work on From header, or Return-Path? Reason I ask:
I have two emails from “support .at. wasabi.com”. Due to their emails usually
triggering KAM rules I have (in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf):
## Whitelist Wasabi, subject to passing of auth
wh
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 23:05 AEST, Bill Cole
wrote:
On 2023-06-22 at 06:29:53 UTC-0400 (Thu, 22 Jun 2023 20:29:53 +1000)
Simon Wilson via users
is rumored to have said:
> I find most DMARC reports I receive are flagged as spam by SA.
>
> How do people work around this? I&#
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 20:37 AEST, Damian wrote:
I find most DMARC reports I receive are flagged as spam by SA.> Which
submitters? I looked at a bunch of my reports and they are all MIME_GOOD.
That one was from microsoft.
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 121 116
I find most DMARC reports I receive are flagged as spam by SA.
How do people work around this? I've trained Bayes, and that is applying a -ve
offset as expected, but they still end up at over 7.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.215 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2
tests=[BASE64_LENGTH_78_79=0
18 matches
Mail list logo
