I don't know about legitimate, but they have a very rude staff. When we
first started looking at a anti-spam solution, my boss told me to contact
them. Their staff was extremely rude and arrogant. I had to BEG my boss to
let me even try a spamassassin solution. That was several years ago, an
Yes,
That is what I was looking for.
Thanks
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:44 PM
Subject: RE: X-Spam-Status settings
Steven Manross wrote:
_TESTSSCORES(,)_
From: Shane Mullin
I have forgotten the setting that tells SA to
include the point value for each of the hits the incoming message was flagged
on. I searched the web and looked in my book, but can't seem to find
it. Could someone please jog my memory?
Thanks
Shane
We have been running Spamassassin for several years
now. It has done a super job for our school system. Spamassassin has
opened many doors for OpenSource software in our division. I just have one
dumb question that I have not been able to answer. Why is some email
flagged as SPAM and som
hey andy,
sa is really a great piece of software. i would highly recommend a
book and some serious reading. sounds like you need to fine tune sa.
and that is one of the great things about sa, you can configure it to
your needs.
shane
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Pieters" <[EMA
Thanks Martin,
It is a Dell 2850 2.4 Ghz with 2.0 GB ram. I never thought about
how the RBL's are called.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'shane mullins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent:
Thanks Martin,
We use amavis-new.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'shane mullins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:20 AM
Subject: RE: Spamassassin vs spamd
> Shane
Is anyone here running spamd? We use
Spamassassin 3.0.4 and several SARE rules. Now that our primary MX server
handles about 20k emails a day, cpu usage stays over 90 % and load average is
between 5 and 6. I was wondering how much faster spamd is?
Thanks
Shane
;Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "shane mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: broken spamassassin
At 03:09 PM 2/4/2005, shane mullins wrote:
When I run spamassassin --lint, I get the following error:
# spamassassin --lin
When I run spamassassin --lint, I get the following error:
# spamassassin --lint
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: smtp inet
- y - - smtpd
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: pickupfifo
- y 60 1 picku
ore technically specific)
Rob McEwen
-----Original Message-
From: Shane Mullins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:11 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: spam warning from zd net
Here is a link from ZDNet warning of a spam increase. I can't wait to see
SA s
Here is a link from ZDNet warning of a spam
increase. I can't wait to see SA smat it down.
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5560664.html?tag=nl.e589
Shane
Hey John,
The Bayes_9x scores were a bit low for our needs. So we bumped them
up. That is one of the great things I like about SA. You can customize
it to meet your needs.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: BAYES_99 = 1.9?
To: ; "Paul
Hey Nate,
I would look at using Bayes. It is well worth the time to set it
up. Also, you may want to make sure that the dns tests are working. I
don't remember exactly how to do it. Try this spamassassin -D --lint
and then look for something pertaining to dns tests. Someone once
posted th
Yes, I even reboote the machine. It is a very odd issue, it writes to the
console and the screen.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: Somewhat OT postfix question
I made sure
that amavis was set
box, but I can go to the console
and choose another screen.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "shane mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: Somewhat OT postfix question
On Wed
I tried searching the archives on the postfix.users groups and google,
but came up empty. Here is our issue: We have two spam servers. A
primary and secondary postfix/sa box. Our primary box writes every smtp
transaction to the screen. Since it is a busy mail server, it is
virtually impossible
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "shane mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 5:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: DNS tests
>
>
> >> On Friday, December 31, 2004, 2:15:51 PM, shane mullins wr
The Net::DNS module is ver 0.48.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "shane mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 5:13 PM
Subject: DNS tests
> Our secondary spam box is not performing dns tests. The perl mod dns
is
> installed and the d
Our secondary spam box is not performing dns tests. The perl mod dns is
installed and the dns_available option is set in the local.cf. Does
anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks
Shane
>
To: "'shane mullins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: spam tagging
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: shane mullins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:3
I have a simple tagging question. I searched around, but didn't find a
solid answer. We have our mail set to be discarded at a score of 5.0,
and it works great. But, we would like to have spam above 3.0 tagged,
and looking at the message source, it is, along with the tests that
flagged it. Woul
I know what you mean Pete,
I work for a public school system, and it is a major fight whenever
I introduce an OpenSource solution. By using OpenSource solutions, I
have provided better solutions to problems, and saved much money. But,
it has not been easy, and there have been few, if any tha
I am still not getting any Bayes entries in my maillog.We are
running: OpenBSD 3.5, SA 3.0.2, amavisd-new, dcc and razor. With the
following info provided, does anyone have any ideas? I could provide
more details if needed.
Here is my local.cf references to Bayes:
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_le
,
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Florian Effenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Shane Mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: more spam gets through since SA 3.x
> Hi Shane,
>
> > I had a simila
I had a similar prob. Check to make sure Bayes is working. Also, check the
all trusted rule.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Florian Effenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 3:44 AM
Subject: more spam gets through since SA 3.x
Hello fellow SA users,
may
it would
be even better.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Ronan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "shane mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: SA-LEARN feature
> we run the same config smtp exim w/ exiscan ACL filter
The sa-learn feature is great. And, I know, this has been brought up
before. But, could someone please tell me how to get the spam/ham
messages back to our spam filters? Our spam filters are smtp gateways
only. We use OpenBSD 3.5, Spamassassin 3.0.1, dcc, razor and amavisd.
Shane
Found part of the problem. I did not import my db after upgrading, do
my bayes db were not working. Fixed that with:
sa-learn --import
sa-learn --sync
Hope this save someone else some time.
Shane
> shane mullins wrote:
> > When we first built our spam filters, over a year ago,
When we first built our spam filters, over a year ago, it worked great
out of the box. It was incredible. But, over time some spam started to
get through. We were running SA 2.64. So I upgraded to SA 3.01. And
about the same amount of spam was still getting through. Could someone
please point
Thanks,
That should work fine.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Deugau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: SA auto-learn question
> Michael Barnes wrote:
> > What you are asking about is manual learning in the event of an
error
We have been using SA for over a year now. It has been great to us. I
just upgraded both of our filters to SA 3.0.1 last night. I just have
one question. When using the auto learn command, how do you get spam
messages to the spam filter, in order to run auto learn? For example,
our spam filter
- Original Message -
From:
Gary W.
Smith
To: shane mullins
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:55
AM
Subject: RE: new member
It was kinda a joke
:).
Anyways, welcome to the list. BTW,
before asking any questions I would recommend checking the
33 matches
Mail list logo
