Hello,
I didn't get an update since 5 March (1908044).
FreeBSD 12.4-RELEASE-p2
spamassassin 4.0.0_2
Mar 17 08:19:41.458 [41854] dbg: channel: metadata version = 1908044,
from file /var/db/spamassassin/4.00/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
Mar 17 08:19:41.471 [41854] dbg: dns: 0.0.4.updates.spam
Thank you for the reply.
> No, ALL_TRUSTED means that the email only passed through trusted
> IP addresses or was authenticated into the trusted network.
Yes. Sorry, I phrased it badly.
My main point here was the TVD tags. Why sometimes and not others in
virtually identical emails with no bodi
One of my web sites sends me a minimal email to indicate its status.
There is no body, just a subject and the usual headers. It is sent
several times a day.
The sending domain is in the trusted_networks list so the SA report
includes ALL_TRUSTED - full X-Spam-Status is (and should be)...
No
> If you still can't find it, try doing
> spamassassin --lint -Dconfig
Ok, John, that pointed me in the right direction. Thanks.
It was in whitelist_dkim.cf of all places! I can't recall specifically
adding that rule to the whitelist but then: I have a poor memory for
such things; but the
> what .cf file includes that rule on your system?
That was the point: I can't find it. I've done a grep for NOTSAME on
usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf but got nothing. Is there another place I
should be looking?
Forgot to mention:
SA version: 3.3.2
Perl version: 5.14.2
--
Dave Stiles
Many thanks for that, Bowie.
--
Dave Stiles
On 28/09/16 15:31, Axb wrote:
You are awake that it's not really polite to hijack a thread with
something totally unrelated?
It was relevant. I was trying to compare my system to the OP's.
--
Dave Stiles
I'm getting false positives on this one...
NOTSAME__REPLY_TO From yahoo but reply to yandex
score 1.0
... where reply-to and from are both yahoo.co.uk. There is no sign of
yandex anywhere.
I've looked for this rule but cannot find it. Could someone please a)
tell me where it is and b) fix
I've tried to run "spamassassin -D --lint" several times over the past
few years but never successfully. It always over-spills Terminal and all
attempts to pipe it to file or to more / less fail. Is there ANY way to
get a sensible listing from this command, please? I'm sure there must be.
--
D
Thanks for the extra info and advice, RW. Noted. :)
--
Dave Stiles
Thanks, RW. That's stopped it reporting valid gmail. Now I'll have to
wait to see if it reports false gmail. :)
--
Dave Stiles
network between gmail and
you it's probably being modified
As I said, direct from gmail to my own mail server. SA flags are:
BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED
DKIM_VALID
DKIM_VALID_AU
FREEMAIL_FROM
HTML_MESSAGE
NOTVALID_GMAIL
SPF_PASS
USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL
>priority NOTVALID_GMAIL 500
Setting
Thanks, Martin. That will take a little more time than I currently have
but I'll certainly try it in a few days' time.
--
Dave Stiles
Thanks for the explanation. I feared as much.
Not possible for me to modify hmail (not a C++ programmer). I could look at SA
code and how to compile but would be a significant learning curve which I don't
have time for right now. I'll just have to live with it for the time being.
Th
Hello,
running SA 3.4.0 binary as supplied by Jam software on windows 7 from
hMailserver using SRVANY.EXE Service wrapper aaround spamd.exe
All is running fine but I would like to be able to multiply the
accumulated/total _SCORE_ by 10 before it is returned to hMailserver so that I
don&#
I am running Postfix with Amavisd-maia which in turn uses Mail::SpamAssassin..
I am running SPF checks with Postfix and that works reasonably well
but it fails at catching fake senders in the 'DATA' portion of the
SMTP conversation.
Say my domain is: test.com
the envelope of the message wi
On Jan 29, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
maybe its just me, but was there really an issue with out of office
messages?
(except in this mailing list :-)
[ snip]
Report: Hi Brian, Thank you for getting this to us so quickly! We
will be sending a PO over within the next couple of
SpamBayes configuration file into Spam
Assassin? It seems a waste to have to start training SpamAssassin from
scratch when I already have a well-tuned configuration file.
The only feature I could find was sa-learn, but this requires the original
emails which I do not have.
Thanks for any help.
James
--
> I should point out -- half of the "attention from jail users" comment has
> to do with another issue -- only people with jails can effectively test
> any potential fix. That poses a big problem for developers testing.
i think syndey's seeing it in/on non-jail osx, as well cref: the bug.
c
> Not wasted breath as long as you'll accept:
>
> Patches Welcome!
>
> as a response :)
heh! you have that reponse on "auto dial", doncha? come on, now --
fess up ;-) (p.s., i wasn't referring to those -- such as yourself --
already *on* the 'right' side of the argument)
yes. patches. once a p
t will probably only get attention from other jail
> users
heh. understood. and, expected.
alas, i know it's wasted breath to argue that the prevalence of SA-(&
everything else, for that matter)-in-jails/VMs is only going to
increase, and that this will not be an atypical use-case .
ing)...
admittedly, those are fairly-old-problem holdovers ... and i stand corrected.
with 'just',
setenv LDFLAGS "-L/usr/local/lib"
setenv CPPFLAGS "-I/usr/local/include"
setenv CFLAGS$CPPFLAGS
perl Makefile.PL \
PREFIX=/usr/local \
DATADIR=/usr/local
noting that
(a) these errors have appeared before
(b) you've some suspicion that it may be related to issue w/ solaris zones
(c) y'all are goin' great-guns on -devel wrapping up bugs for 324
should i open a bug on this? or is it something that'll get some
attention anyway?
thanks!
hi justin,
On Dec 30, 2007 4:16 AM, Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could it be the use of 127.0.0.1, opening listening sockets there
> etc.? we have had issues
> with that and solaris zones.
one of the "joys" of FreeBSD v6.2R jails seems to be "only one IP per
jail". (there are kernel
hi matthias,
> i use CPAN on a FreeBSD 4.8 Jail to install / upgrade SA and i never
> successfuly run 'make test'
> the same goes for compiling from the sources.
>
> but i installed with 'notest install ' in CPAN and have no
> Problems while
hi,
bldg SA 32x-branch manually, from src in a freebsd jail.
SA builds/installs/runs without noticeable issue.
but, 'make test' has scads of failures ... similar to those mentioned here:
http://www.nabble.com/Re:-Problem-with-3.2.2-p14236931.html
picking one, "t/spamc_op
hi michael,
> I am the official ports maintainer for the SA port on Freebsd.
:-)
> I notice you are using the ports version of openssl,
yes
> but not the ports version of SA (you are using SVN) and you are mixing a ports
> version of openssl with the SVN version of SA.
since S
i'm migrating to SA 32x-branch/svn (r607171) on FreeBSD 62.
i've openssl installed from ports in prefix=/usr/local, i.e.,
ssl libs in /usr/local/lib
ssl incs in /usr/local/include/openssl
echoing my working procedure from osx, i
cd spamassassin
setenv LDFLAGS "-L/usr/loc
> Yeah, that's the expiry first pass. As it said, it couldn't find a
> good atime delta to use for expiry, so it didn't anything.
ok, so it's "expected". read on ...
> "man sa-learn" has a large amount of information about how all of this works
> > where it just 'sits' for awhile -- no errors in logs -- and,
> > eventually, 'releases' and completes without error.
>
> What are the messages when that happens? It shouldn't just exit.
Here's a recent example,
> sa-learn --force-expire
Hi,
I'm updating SA & exploring/cleaning Bayes DBs on a slighty 'dusty' box.
after update to latest SA 32x-branch, --lint is OK.
but, currently, i get:
sa-learn --force-expire -D
...
[19416] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
[19416] dbg: bayes:
hi andy,
> For what it's worth, the fuzzyocr hashing is of very limited value, and in
> many cases is a severe performance hit. I found that scanning the hashes,
> due to the "fuzzy" nature, is more costly than just rescanning the file
> with OCR, as *each* *and* *every* hash must be checked itera
aha!
in FuzzyOcr.cf,
- focr_hashing_learn_scanned 1
+ focr_hashing_learn_scanned 0
then,
rm Fuzzy*db*
now, as expected ...
18 FUZZY_OCR BODY: Img with common spam text inside
[Words found:]
hi,
(you 'busted out' of the thread ... replying back in it.)
> Disable the FuzzyOcr's result hash cache on both machines before testing for
> differences: you are looking at stale results.
>
> If these systems cached the results when the version or config of the two
> FuzzyOcr(s) were not the sa
hi,
grr. i'm at that resorting-to-visine stage of wtf ... :-/
i've
spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.2.4-r564346
running on Perl version 5.8.8
with, among numerous other ruls/plugins, FuzzyOcr/r330 installed.
i've just updated two supposedly identical boxes, b
> since rulesrc is independent of the SA distribution.
Good to know.
Perhaps I *should* know. Can't find that stated/clarified anywhere in
the src tree. I've looked repeatedly. If it's supposed to be
obvious, i'm clueless.
My -- incorrect -- presumption has been, sinc
> > also, when did plugins move (back?) to rulesrc/sandbox/... as opposed
> > to rules/...?
>
> I suspect you had the output of a "mkrules" compilation step in
> your "rules" dir; they were always there, in the sandbox, but
> mkrules copies them into &q
fair enuf.
where are such removals documented? my point being simply: it *was*
in the src tree, suddenly it isn't. even if well-justified, shouln't
that action be *mentioned* in Changelog?
also, when did plugins move (back?) to rulesrc/sandbox/... as opposed
to rules/...?
hi,
i've a script that keeps me up to date with latest 32x-branch svn.
in today's DL/co of r570165
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.2 spamassassin
i note that,
rules/SIQ.pm
rules/SendmailID.pm
are no longer there (iirc, they were 'fairly recentl
hi,
> I think either different family, or different CPU arch, will be a
> problem to be honest...
yeah, probably right ... worth a look-see, though.
(or, i should simply build that 16-core Opteron box and be done with it ...)
> Yep, with a HUP.
thanks.
cheers!
hi,
> it's compiled C code, so whatever affects portability of that will
> affect compiled rulesets too.
likely depends on choices of compile-time optimization, i think.
need to read up, and check if/what presumptions are made by sa-compile process.
i've cross-compiled across
as long as my
SA-version
included rulesets
enabled plugins
are the SAME from arch/OS to arch/OS, is it OK to simply compile rules
once somewhere, and push them to each box?
or, *is* there some sort of processor/architecture, or other
environmental, depdency that throws a wrench into the
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:09:49AM +0200, Matthias Haegele wrote:
> SA Lists schrieb:
>
> Dont think so:
> http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/clamav/
> "Phishing and Scam Signatures for ClamAV"
>
> >I have just now included many of the SARE rules in my sa-update.
Matthias +all,
Thank you very much.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 01:02:53PM +0200, Matthias Haegele wrote:
>
> You only mentioned running sa-learn on spam you should also learn your
> hammessages, both is important. Bayes-Performance will only be good if
> learned on both, ham an
Hello all,
I am only a home user, but I am trying to provide a spam-free environment to
all members of my household. I have SA (3.2.2) set up with bayesian rules and
run sa-learn every night. SA's performance is "average" (having caught c.600
out of the 1,000 or so spam mails
> could you open an enhancement request on the bugzilla for this?
fyi: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5594
> Unfortunately -- not yet. It'll take code changes to sa-compile,
> specifically to cache the "base strings" somewhere so they don't have to
> be re-extracted next time.
>
> could you open an enhancement request on the bugzilla for this?
will do.
thanks!
hi jason,
> If I understand correctly, part of the recompile process includes removing
> redundant regexps. It can only do this if all rulesets are available at
> compile
> time for comparison.
hm. if that *is* the case, then you've got a point.
just seems that if we
i use sa-update to update/maintain three separate source channels of rules,
sudo -u spam sa-update --channelfile DIST-ch.conf
sudo -u spam sa-update --channelfile SARE-ch.conf --gpgkey 856AA88A
sudo -u spam sa-update --channelfile JMAS-ch.conf --gpgkey 6C6191E3
where
i use sa-update to update/maintain three separate source channels of rules,
sudo -u spam sa-update --channelfile DIST-ch.conf
sudo -u spam sa-update --channelfile SARE-ch.conf --gpgkey 856AA88A
sudo -u spam sa-update --channelfile JMAS-ch.conf --gpgkey 6C6191E3
where
atm, you need to patch the source, and rebuild ... e.g.,
cd /top/of/fresh/src/tree/for/spamassassin
wget -k -O bug5574_patch4077.patch
"http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4077&action=view";
patch -p0 < bug5574_patch4077.patch
config, build & install
fwiw, works peachy-keen w
got it.
rats!, nonetheless...
thx!
i currently use a cron job to
sa-update --channelfile /usr/local/etc/sa/update-DIST-ch.conf
sa-update --channelfile /usr/local/etc/sa/update-SARE-ch.conf
pulling updates, as available, into my system-wide rules update directory.
if updates exist, then i compile them,
sa-compile
ah. so 'tis 'just' that "require". gr8.
i've become too attuned to the appearance of "fail" in --lint ouput ...
thanks!
i've sa v32-branch, r560837 installed.
i have perl 588 + Mail::SPF installed,
module_info Mail::SPF
Name:Mail::SPF
Version: v2.005
...
but NOT Mail::SPF::Query.
reading @ SA/INSTALL,
"Either of Mail::SPF or
The current SA install was from my initial install of RHEL 4 and using
up2date to get the packages all current. I figured I would stop using
up2date from this point on and switch to CPAN upgrades in the future. The
CPAN method is what I had used before and it worked nicely, plus I can stay
Thanks!
Instead of messing with the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin file, I just
commented out those lines. Any reason to keep this configuration, other than
wanting more headaches in the future when I try to figure this out again?
Kris Deugau writes:
sa-list wrote:
I can't seem to g
I can't seem to get SA & Syslog to log messages to a log file other than
maillog.
I changed the spamassassin start up script to add "-s local5" to the spamd
start up options. I modified syslog.conf to add local5 as an entity. I
restarted syslog, courier and spamd. I still g
Matt Kettler wrote:
sa-exim wrote:
I have Suse 10.1 exim, spamassassin 3.1.7 with bayes first the
spamassassin does it's job very well but spam does get through once in
awhile so I move all spam to a junk folder then upload this file to
the server, then I run sa_learn on the junk fil
just fine. Now the problem is i installed this setup with the suse
add ons and it created the user nobody for SA. Spamassassin uses this
created user nobody but the sa_learn uses the /root/spamassassin folder
to update the rules. Then I have to copy these file to the nobody
folder. Then every
Yes, it is fail only in test phase. I can do force install but, I would like
to know is there any affect on the functioning of spamassassin?
Thanks
Pauk
On 12/5/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:20:39PM -0500, Pauk Sa wrote:
> Anybody can gui
It is on OpenBSD 4.0-STABLE. I did not build perl and install it from the
package.
On 12/5/06, C. Bensend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody can guide me how to proceed. I am installing SpamAssassin on
> OpenBSD
> 4.0 and it failed during the test phase. I have attached the output.
> Perl ve
Hi,
Anybody can guide me how to proceed. I am installing SpamAssassin on OpenBSD
4.0 and it failed during the test phase. I have attached the output.
Perl version is v5.8.8 built for i386-openbsd 4.0
Running make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
"test_ha
from cron and instantly blocks hosts that have sent
us more than some maximum number of spam messages within last hour (or any
duration of your choice).
The script is availble from http://sa-russian.narod.ru/block_spammers.bash
Understanding of some fundamentals of BASH scripting is expected. The
Hi everybody!
Welcome to test russian ruleset for SpamAssassin. The ruleset file can be
downloaded from the URL:
http://sa-russian.narod.ru/99_russian_re.cf
The ruleset reflects the list of tokens, often found in russian spam. The list
of tokens is available at URL (KOI8-R encoding):
http://sa
mail and feed it to spamassassin, it passes.
Is there a way to dump the input message as it enters spamassassin? I
have spamd running as a daemon, using version 3.1.1. The log shows:
spamassassin -t
Next question: how can I obtain "message" the way spamassassin sees it,
not in its
Hi,
I am new to this list. I have searched the spamassassin FAQ and list
archive but couldn't find the answer.
I have the following test rule in my local.cf:
header LOCAL_MISSING_MSGID MESSAGEID =~ /^UNSET$/ [if-unset: UNSET]
describe LOCAL_MISSING_MSGIDMissing Message-Id header
score
Hello,
I am working to get SA 3.10 working on a Win 2000 server. I had Sa 3.04
working well previous to this upgrade.
The problem I now have seems to be the CRLF problem that I have found
posting about.
There appears to be patch(es) for this problem, but after searching, I am
unable to find
Lisa,
> Hi,
>
> >
> > Well, lets say the hosted domains are dom1.org and dom2.org
> >
> > My problem is:
> >
> > User Sam and Joe has internet access via DSL with a dynamic ip address.
> > The
> > mail going from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is identified as SPAM
> because
> > the send
OTECTED]>
To: "Leonard SA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: spamassassin --D lint failing?
Leonard SA wrote:
Hello List ..
For some odd reason everytime I restart spamd or run spamassassin --D
lint ; I get some odd parse errors.
Hello List ..
For some odd reason everytime I restart spamd or run spamassassin --D lint
; I get some odd parse errors.
###
[25084] warn: config: failed to parse, now a plugin, skipping:
ok_languages_all
[25084] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: use_dcc_1
[25084]
Thanks all for the suggestions..!
Regards ..
Leonard
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Knuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Block By Subject LIKE
Hallo und Guten Abend Leonard,
Heute (am 24.11.2005 - 19:18 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
Hello
Hello List..
Is it possible to reject, add weight (score), etc
mail by subject LIKE rules?
Regards ..
Leonard
BTW list ..
Can I use the whitelisting feature eventhough I use qmail-scanner? Where
would this be configured?
Regards ..
Leonard
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Leonard SA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Novem
Jeff,
Thanks again ..
Regards ..
Leonard
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Leonard SA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: spamcop.net tactics
On Wednesday, November 23, 2005, 5:3
Hello,
I have had to remove spamcop from my rbl check list. they have had some
legitimate mail servers listed recently. They had the gentoo mail list
listed and some other important servers which i cant see why they were
added.
Regards ..
Leonard
- Original Message -
From: "Christo
's your uncle. (I remember my
fortunately brief struggle with this. At the moment mine looks much like
this:
trusted_networks 127/8 207.217.121/24
internal_networks 192.168/16
The 207 address space I accept is where Earthlink.net's pop3 servers live.
I use fetchmail from them.
I hope
J,
sorry about that offline email .. :(
Thanks for the answer also. I will definitely make some changes to adjust a
more secure setup ..
Regards ..
Leonard
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Leonard SA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
ing them either. They're just removed from the corpus
and handled by the developers as if they don't exist.
Heh, I use the ClamAV plugin for SA and give it a hefty score. That way
I get the best of both worlds. Creative use of BLs also helps.
{^_^}
I think you have something here. Checking the maildroprc script shows it
calling spamassassin instead of spamc. Changing this and restarting Courier
now gives me log messages in the new log file defined by syslog.conf.
Thanks for the insight!
Matt Kettler writes:
At 09:58 PM 3/22/2005, you
I am using Courier and Maildrop. The scanning seems to be working since I
can see the header information and I have SA configured to "rewrite_header"
and this is happening correctly for spam with scores higher than 5.0.
Does this answer your question? What else would you need to see
I am having problems getting logging to work.
I am using SA 3.02 on RHEL3. SA is working. Mail headers show the headers
such as:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.domain.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > > Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > > > > Am I in
Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > > Mar 13 01
Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> > > <[EMAIL PROTE
Are there problems with mail header identification?
Am I in the wrong list with this question?
Thanks
Lars Dierich
> Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
> concatenation (.) or
I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.2 via CPAN with no problems.
Yes, I read
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/UPGRADE
und did change my local.cf.
1) Now Mail don't get tagged as spam
==
/va/log/mail
Mar 14 12:34:33 ns spamd[27959]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at po
Am 14.03.2005 um 07:54 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> hi all
>
> is anyone using a tool that can parse "/var/log/messages" to find
> identified SPAM and is able to then build MTRG graphs ?
I use Mailgraph
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~dws/software/mailgraph/
it uses the RRD to store the data.
Lars
Rodney Richison wrote:
I'm having a bit of trouble finding information on, and using
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
Though, I've installed the module needed via cpan, and enabled it in my
local.cf file,
I do not know what it does exactly.
I would like to give a score based
jdow wrote:
From: "Rainer Sokoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:59:50AM -, bubba wrote:
Are you sure that the user calling procmail is the same user you are
if
you
run spamc from the command line?
When I run spamc from the command line, I've done so as root. I take it
I
need to
To conserve resources, we use SA on a limited basis, such as based on
"Received:" headers or X-Mailer or certain Country codes that we don't
block ourtright.
Currently, SA is called by amavisd-new. Would we be likely to gain or
lose if we changed to calling spamc/spamd via courier
reached the spam threshold, mark it as spam, and move on to the
next one. The idea is that you would not have to run every single
negative scoring test on every message. This should save some CPU
cycles.
I think I remember a similar feature in a (very) early version of SA
back in the day, but it
On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 17:42, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>
> Didn't SPEWS shut down and blacklist the world?
>
> Thomas
No.
--
Robin Lynn Frank Director of Operations
(0 0)Paradigm-Omega, LLC
V http://www.paradigm-omega.com/
=
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:56:27 +0900
alan premselaar wrote:
> Chances are if your mail is being rejected (5xx errors), then there's
> something in your MTA configuration that's checking SPEWS and rejecting
> based on its results. (which I personally feel isn't such a great tactic
> for just THIS
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:59:35 -0800
Robert Menschel wrote:
> However, if you were in
> business and sending emails to your customers or clients, would you
> insult them with the demand "Get a capable html e-mailer"? Any company
> that does that to me loses my business without any second thoughts.
>
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 11:24, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 08:25:07 -0800, SA wrote
> > For some time I have been trying to determine why spamassassin
> > performance on our server hasn't been as rapid as it should be. I think
> > I've discovered a
For some time I have been trying to determine why spamassassin
performance on our server hasn't been as rapid as it should be. I think
I've discovered a possible cause. The server can be busy with lots of
things and not degrade SA performance greatly. But, let another perl
process r
I recently installed SA 3.0.1. Everything is working fine... but
now I want to set up some filters in my e-mail client. What I
want to do is automatically send anything with more than some
number of stars to the trash bin. I can do that with a
regex-like expression in my email client. But I
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 09:49, Troels Walsted Hansen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I created a small plugin using the new plugin API in SpamAssassin 3.x.
> The plugin connects to a local ClamAV server (through TCP) and checks
> the email for virus. If a virus is found, it returns a positive return
> code to
Hi
I would like to know if it is possible to have a per domain
configuration using spamassassin 2.64 + amavisd p10 on a single server.
I mean having one pair of spamassassin 2.64 + amavisd p10 processes
handling with domain1 and domain2 for example , another pair handling
with for domain3 etc e
100 matches
Mail list logo
