>>> Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/22/07 01:20AM >>>
Loren Wilton wrote:
> 4.He then COMPLAINS that rules are causing him FPs and demands that
> the rules be changed.
Your rule is matching against messages which it shouldn't.
> 5.He THEN claims I am lying and making false assertions w
>>> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/25/07 10:03AM >>>
Clay Davis wrote:
> Has anyone thrown this to the SA wolves... I mean group, to get their
> opnion? (get ready to duck!)
> Clay
Disclaimer: I'm just a community member, and really don't care about
Guinevere or GWAVA, nor do I know much abou
>>> Jon Ribbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/20/06 03:16PM >>>
Adam Lanier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's why I asked to see a sample message. We could probably give some
> pointers on what is triggering SA.
I have attached a sample message to this email. Note, it's just an
example. This message d
>>> Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/14/06 09:06AM >>>
It's being kept alive artificially. They themselves knows that it's
broken because they are now running away for the spam solution label
that way Bush is running away from "mission acomplished". I say it's
time to pull the feeding tube an
>>> Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/06/06 02:26PM >>>
On 6-nov-2006, at 19:59, Claus Westerkamp wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Id like to modify the Score output of spamassassin. I want 3digits
> display permanently (e.g. ***(Score002.3)*** or ***(Score102.3)*** )
>
> Is this possible? I wan
>>> Michael W Cocke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/31/06 12:55PM >>>
I've got every ruleset & blacklist available and I'm still getting
buried - the bayes poison in all of the recent spam has wrecked that.
Does anyone see a reason why I can't assume messages with blank
subjects are junk? Also, I've got an
