how much will the following imbalance skew the bayes algorithms (if at all)
bash-2.03$ sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 54265 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 206342 0 non-token data:
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:59:11 +
Received: from isaiah.qub.ac.uk ([143.117.143.16] helo=mailhub1.qub.ac.uk)
by staffmail-b.qub.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1D8zqJ-00048U-Ov
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is there a way to temporarily switch off either razor or dcc?
Im running spamd on a sunblade 100 dual 800Mhz cpu with razor
SURBL(local dns) and dcc network tests but am still getting timeouts on
the mail relays becuase of (i think) the network tests lagging a bit
causing timeouts. Im workin
hi,
upgrading spamd servers and running a few tests on 3.0.2
I sent an email with "fuck" in both the body and again seperatly in
the subject...
but even though there is a rule for it (LIVE_PORN) and i know the
bayes+net score was zero so I manually set it to 5 (local.cf)but even
then It isnt be
I have two mailhubs running exim (w/ exiscan) +SA+others
I want to let them use each others spamd if the load gets too great on
any one machine
mailhub1
spamd:
/usr/local/bin/spamd -d -r /logs/spamd.pid -m 7 \
-i -A 127.0.0.1,mailhub2IP
exiscan:
spamd_address = 127.0.0.1 783 : mailhub2IP
I am aware that this is a SA list.. and my posting my generate some
flames...
but can anyone perhaps highlight some of the main plus points of SA over
.eg. Dspam??
One of my objectives here in work is to (even though we are enjoying the
best anti spam experience in recent history since i upgrad
