Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:59:11 +0000
Received: from isaiah.qub.ac.uk ([143.117.143.16] helo=mailhub1.qub.ac.uk)
by staffmail-b.qub.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1D8zqJ-00048U-Ov
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:59:11 +0000
Received: from mail01.birthdayalarm.com ([65.19.128.185])
by mailhub1.qub.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1D8zqG-0004WT-2J
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:59:08 +0000
Received: by mail01.birthdayalarm.com (PowerMTA(TM) v2.0r13) id h5rigo059m0f; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:59:06 +0000 (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:55:32 +0000 (GMT)
From: Alana Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Updating my address book
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 09/03/2005 11:55:32, Alana Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello > > > > I would like to include your contact information in an address book I am > creating for myself. Please enter your particulars using the link you see > below: > > > > http://www.bebo.com/fr1/10076492a285606901b140803462c883765683d20
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on baalam.qub.ac.uk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2
---- Start SpamAssassin results
SpamAssassin Version 3.0.2 on baalam.qub.ac.uk
-3.8 points, 5.0 required;
-1.1 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
[score: 0.2605]
-4.3 RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED RBL: Sender is in Bonded Sender Program (trusted relay)
[IronPort Bonded Sender - <http://www.bondedsender.com>]
1.6 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST RBL: Envelope sender in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
---- End of SpamAssassin results
should this obvious spam be allowed in BSP??
