> On Jun 24, 2025, at 7:42 AM, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
>
> Hi Bill
>
>> Note that there are also subsets of Received headers with fields parsed
>> out that you can use, see `perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus` for
>> a discussion of all of the available "pseudo-headers." There are
>>
> On Sep 29, 2022, at 11:26 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>
> Kris Deugau writes:
>
>> The Bayes result is not great, but the USER_IN_DEF_*_WL hits between
>> them account for most of that negative score anyway.
>
> With dkim-signed spam, I think the only two paths forward are:
> - hope they f
What are other people doing now that MaxMind has deprecated Perl support for
their databases?
> On Mar 28, 2024, at 12:18 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> wrote:
>
>>> On 27.03.24 20:56, Philip Prindeville via users wrote:
>>>> I have something that looks like:
>>>>
>>>> whitelist_from_rcvd v...@yandex.ru vger.kernel.org
>>&g
> On Mar 28, 2024, at 12:18 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> wrote:
>
>>> On 27.03.24 20:56, Philip Prindeville via users wrote:
>>>> I have something that looks like:
>>>>
>>>> whitelist_from_rcvd v...@yandex.ru vger.kernel.org
>>&g
> On Mar 28, 2024, at 2:39 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 27.03.24 20:56, Philip Prindeville via users wrote:
>> I have something that looks like:
>>
>> whitelist_from_rcvd v...@yandex.ru vger.kernel.org
>>
>> blacklist_from *@yandex.ru
>
Hi.
I have something that looks like:
whitelist_from_rcvd v...@yandex.ru vger.kernel.org
blacklist_from *@yandex.ru
And I only ever seem to see the 2nd rule being hit, but not the first.
What is the order of evaluation? Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf doesn't say that I
