Re: Order of handling whitelist/blacklist

[Philip Prindeville via users]

> On Mar 28, 2024, at 2:39 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> 
> On 27.03.24 20:56, Philip Prindeville via users wrote:
>> I have something that looks like:
>> 
>> whitelist_from_rcvd v...@yandex.ru vger.kernel.org
>> 
>> blacklist_from *@yandex.ru
>> 
>> And I only ever seem to see the 2nd rule being hit, but not the first.
>> 
>> What is the order of evaluation?  Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf doesn't say that 
>> I could find.
>> 
>> You'd think the first would happen first, since it's more specific.
>> 
>> Or, maybe that both would happen.
> 
> they both should happen.
> note that the second argument must be Received: header provided by trusted 
> server, so that argument depends on proper TrustPath set up
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/TrustPath
> -- 
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
>   One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them,
> One OS to bring them all and into darkness bind them

My config also has:

trusted_networks 192.168.6.0/24
trusted_networks 192.168.8.0/24
trusted_networks 127.0.0.1/32

So I don't think that's the problem.

What are some steps to troubleshoot how the white/black-listing is happening?

Thanks