e
> TxRep to replace AWL which is in trunk.
Done. Please find it at
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7032
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
tflags->{$test} =~ /\bnoautolearn\b/;
+ return 0 if exists $tflags->{$test} && $tflags->{$test} =~ /\bnoawl\b/;
$points += $scores->{$test};
}
As sa-learn was giving errors like:
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/AWL.pm line 440.
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
On Sunday 30 March 2014 13:52:43 Ivo Truxa wrote:
> Nuno Fernandes-2 wrote
>
> > Yes.. you are correct. The result is not added to the AWL database but i'm
> > ok with that.
>
> Personally I think it makes no sense using AWL when you do not let it work,
Oh.. but it
g
> the new score to the total).
Thanks for the tip.. I'll look into it...
Nuno Fernandes
On Monday 24 March 2014 12:18:05 Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 03/24/2014 12:14 PM, Nuno Fernandes wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 March 2014 07:50:50 Matt Kettler wrote:
> >>> Does this do it?
> >>>
> >>> score AWL 0
> >>> meta LOCAL_SCORE_AWL AW
local RBL i would like to remove AWL all together.
Guess i will have to hack AWL.pm :(
Thanks,
Nuno Fernandes
Hello,
Is it possible to disable awl (or at least score it 0.001) when a special rule
hit like:
if URIBL_DBL_SPAM
score AWL 0
endif
Is there any other way to achieve this goal?
Thanks,
Nuno Fernandes
On Thursday 27 February 2014 09:54:44 Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 2/27/2014 5:54 AM, Axb wrote:
> > On 02/27/2014 11:41 AM, Nuno Fernandes wrote:
> >> On Thursday 27 February 2014 11:09:06 Axb wrote:
> >>> On 02/27/2014 10:49 AM, Nuno Fernandes wrote:
> >>
On Thursday 27 February 2014 11:09:06 Axb wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 10:49 AM, Nuno Fernandes wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm having the following error after upgrading to 3.4.0
> >
> > # spamassassin --lint
> > Feb 27 09:38:27.905 [26166] warn: Use of u
://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/commits/179811
Also tried
# LANG=C spamassassin --lint
with the same results.
Thanks for any help.
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
On Monday 31 August 2009 17:08:10 Savoy, Jim wrote:
> >Ben wrote:
> >
> >Whenever I run sa-learn it claims to learn from every message
>
> regardless of
> whether its being run immediately after being run on the same folder.
>
>
> This was happening to me as well, but I was not running sa-learn fro
om the body to auto-learn as spam. Therefore, the minimum working
value for this option is 6."
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
ist regexp: ^...@domain\.com$
[26305] dbg: rules: ran eval rule USER_IN_WHITELIST ==> got hit (1)
Shouldn't the unwhitelist take precence on the whitelist? I'm using
spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5.rf.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Nuno Fernandes
13 matches
Mail list logo
