Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

Have you check permissions on './spamassassin'? I had semiliar issue in the past! Thanks, Motty On 10/24/18 8:10 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote: Hello.!! I have a problem with the `/.spamassassin/bayes.lock` This is the error I'm seeing :    Oct 23 15:

Re: low score on very spammy email

Thank you all for your help, suggestions. per your suggestions MTA and SA tweaked and already seen a huge difference. Thanks again! On 04/11/2018 09:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 04/10/2018 03:49 PM, Motty Cruz wrote: I apologize here is the email headers and body https

Re: low score on very spammy email

-04-10 17:49 GMT-03:00 Motty Cruz mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com> <mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com     <mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com>>>:     I apologize here is the email headers and body     https://pastebin.com/bgXrfKaQ     You should not take this domain mr

Re: low score on very spammy email

I apologize here is the email headers and body https://pastebin.com/bgXrfKaQ Thanks, On 04/10/2018 01:40 PM, David Jones wrote: On 04/10/2018 03:34 PM, Motty Cruz wrote: Thanks for your help David, https://pastebin.com/wsYRfM8K That email is missing a lot of headers that are critical

Re: low score on very spammy email

Thanks for your help David, https://pastebin.com/wsYRfM8K -Motty On 04/10/2018 01:22 PM, David Jones wrote: On 04/10/2018 03:05 PM, Motty Cruz wrote: Thanks for your prompt reply: https://pastebin.com/bLy3Jcqt The Bayes setup looks good.  Can you put a lightly redacted version of that

Re: low score on very spammy email

s only one piece of your setup Am 10.04.2018 um 22:05 schrieb Motty Cruz: Thanks for your prompt reply: https://pastebin.com/bLy3Jcqt Apr 10 11:51:44 vm1 postfix/qmgr[791]: 723EC1A1706: from=, size=16883, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 10 11:51:46 vm1 amavis[1395]: (01395-01) Passed CLEA

Re: low score on very spammy email

-ID: <1747601d3d0fc$dc189190$9449b4b0$@spontaneous-search-level.com>, mail_id: G71jMeOxz-Ha, Hits: 3.501, size: 16883, 1972 ms root@vm1 On 04/10/2018 12:34 PM, David Jones wrote: On 04/10/2018 02:13 PM, Motty Cruz wrote: tons of spam fed to my spam-filter and yet very spammy emails get low score.

low score on very spammy email

tons of spam fed to my spam-filter and yet very spammy emails get low score. zcat /var/virusmails/spam-G71jMeOxz-Ha.gz | less Return-Path: <> Delivered-To: spam-quarantine X-Envelope-From: X-Envelope-To: X-Envelope-To-Blocked: X-Quarantine-ID: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 3.501 X-Spam-Leve

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

Thanks Tom, my scores were definitely a problem. Thanks again, Motty On 04/05/2018 09:48 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: On 05-04-18 18:40, Motty Cruz wrote: Thanks for your prompt reply John, X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7     tests=[BAYES_50=4.3

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

suggestion and set it to 0.01, will report back shortly. Thanks, On 04/05/2018 09:32 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Motty Cruz wrote: Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD  this rule is allowing spammy emails past through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf? The best way to disable it

how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD  this rule is allowing spammy emails past through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf? Thanks, Motty

SpamAssassin does not scan consistently

Although both of this emails were blocked, both emails were really spammy; one received high score while the other was percentage point away from passing through. My question pertains to spamassassin not consistently given "razor score, URIBL, T_REMOTE_IMAGE" to all emails. It is not being more agg

RE: Anyone else just blocking the ".top" TLD?

Getting tons of this: top.professional.wo...@ub6eual.cpatter.top I am Just blocking "*.top" From: Vincent Fox [mailto:vb...@ucdavis.edu] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 9:27 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Anyone else just blocking the ".top" TLD? Resur

RE: local.cf example

, 2016 10:16 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: local.cf example On 01.11.16 11:24, Motty Cruz wrote: >Very strange, missed configuration, here is another header and I have >not change any configuration and yet this one was scanned: >X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.604 tagged_abo

RE: local.cf example

header.d=kevineikenberry.com I'm very confused. Thanks, Motty -Original Message- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 9:41 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: local.cf example On 01.11.16 08:43, Motty Cruz wrot

RE: local.cf example

ssage- From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 5:35 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: local.cf example On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:25:54 -0700 motty cruz wrote: > AWL is allowing spam email through, It will do, it's a score averager, it mo

local.cf example

Hello, can someone provide local.cf working example? AWL is allowing spam email through, X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 5.114 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.114 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.6 tests=[AWL=-2.530, BAYES_99=4.799, BAYE

Re: PatioDeals@recolong.review how to get high score

stfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unknown_sender_domain> in the .cf file I addes blacklist_from *.review blacklist_from *.work blacklist_from *.date I will be monitoring, Thanks, On 08/13/2015 11:34 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Mott

spamassassin low score

Hello, I get a spam with very low score. AWL=1.350 but that address in not in the whitelist. local.cf required_score 5.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sscsinc.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.559 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3 tests=[

how to change GTUBE default score

Hi, spamassassing is blocking email from my own dowmain because GTUBE score is too high, I tried changing in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs to "score GTUBE 3.0" but no difference. X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 847.462 X-Spam-Level:

BAYES_999=0.2 how to set this score higher?

Hello, I would like to set BAYES_999=0.2 score higher than 0.2; I searching for file but I can't find it in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin (am using FreeBSD) Thanks for your support, Motty

Re: getting tons of SPAM

Hello Benny, I tried to find a legitimate way to reject or drop spam email. I was getting tons of very spammy emails, with very low score. I take very serious your advise and suggestions. I joined this forum because I want to listen to experts. going through the configuration files I realize I had

Re: getting tons of SPAM

Hello Axb, yes you're right I am trying to "reject" emails that end with *.eu and *.link. can I do a wild card *.eu? *.link? Thanks, On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Axb wrote: > On 10/20/2014 04:48 PM, motty cruz wrote: > >> here are the RBLs I am using:

Re: getting tons of SPAM

; > Am 17.10.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Benny Pedersen: > >> On October 16, 2014 11:23:57 PM motty cruz wrote: >> >> I tried to post a sample but got rejected: >>> >> >> Good, thats means that its local problem >> >> Here is goes again, the hea

spam - why spam score is low,

Hello, I am getting tons of spam with very low score: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.712 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.712 tagged_above=-999 required=6.1 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_99=4.5, BAYES_999=0.2, HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE=0.001

Re: I was wrong - Bayes filter not quite right

AM, John Hardin wrote: > > > > On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, motty cruz wrote: > > > >> Hi Bruce, > >> I was having similar issues, can you do su - vscan and restart amavisd > >> service? > > > > user "vscan" != user "amavis". &g

Re: I was wrong - Bayes filter not quite right

Hi Bruce, I was having similar issues, can you do su - vscan and restart amavisd service? make sure you vscan user can read /var/amavisd. also, you must feed about 200+ ham/spam emails to activate bayes. Thanks, On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Bruce Sackett wrote: > So I was able to get the

Re: getting tons of SPAM

looks like gmail won't allow out going email with sample of spam emails, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, motty cruz wrote: > > bayan filter is not running: according to header, >> >> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.c

Re: getting tons of SPAM

bayan filter is not running: according to header, X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.009 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable Rec

Re: getting tons of SPAM

; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=sentineli...@e.safenet-inc.com header.d= e.safenet-inc.com very low score for spammy email. any suggestions? On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:49 AM, motty cruz wrote: > I am using the following RBLs: > > > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at

Re: getting tons of SPAM

I am using the following RBLs: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Steve Bergman wrote: > On 07/01/2014 11:15 PM, Daniel Staal wrote: > > You probably can. ;) But I'm sure Windstream didn't get you every >> piece of mail immediately after it was sent - just as soon as they could >> after they

Re: getting tons of SPAM

Today I build a new Spam filter with latest release, I leave all default configuration except a few changes, for now seem to be doing better at blocking really spammy emails. Thanks for all your help, On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:39 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Martin Gregorie wro

Re: getting tons of SPAM

yes I guest I could change the variable delay, I will do a quick search to see how would affect users. some users are very sensitive to this issues. Thanks a bunch, On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Steve Bergman wrote: > > > On 07/01/2014 03:29 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > >> On Tue, 2014-07-0

Re: getting tons of SPAM

or greylisting ... > > > -- > Jeremy McSpadden > Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net | Endless Solutions > Office : 850-250-5590x501 <850-250-5590;501> | Cell : 850-890-2543 | Fax > : 850-254-2955 > > On Jul 1, 2014, at 2:06 PM, "Steve Bergman" wrote:

Re: getting tons of SPAM

t; Thanks, On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 27.06.14 07:50, motty cruz wrote: >>> >>>> X-Quarantine-ID: <4QFxoaNchYOk> >>>> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com >>>> X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION,

Re: getting tons of SPAM

lp, Thanks On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 27.06.14 07:50, motty cruz wrote: > >> I can't figureout why spammy email get very little score, >> > > X-Quarantine-ID: <4QFxoaNchYOk> >> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.co

Re: getting tons of SPAM

Thank you, I can't figureout why spammy email get very little score, X-Quarantine-ID: <4QFxoaNchYOk> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, MIME error: error: unexpected end of header X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.102 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No,

Re: getting tons of SPAM

.013 score RDNS_DYNAMIC 1.013 score RDNS_NONE 2.013 score STOX_REPLY_TYPE 2.013 score SUBJ_BUY 2.013 score TVD_VISIT_PHARMA 2.913 score TVD_SPACE_RATIO 1.913 score T_REMOTE_IMAGE 3.5 score URIBL_BLACK 4.7 Thanks, On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > motty cruz skrev den 201

Re: getting tons of SPAM

score ONLINE_PHARMACY 3.013 score RDNS_DYNAMIC 1.013 score RDNS_NONE 2.013 score STOX_REPLY_TYPE 2.013 score SUBJ_BUY 2.013 score TVD_VISIT_PHARMA 2.913 score TVD_SPACE_RATIO 1.913 Thanks, On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Axb wrote: > On 06/26/2014 04:23 PM, motty cruz wrote: > >> as y

Re: I am getting lots of SPAM

Thank you, I am running all.spamrats.com, also it may a huge different when I took the recipient off whitelist. Thanks for all your support. On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > reject_rbl_client all.spamrats.com >>> >> > On 29.05.1

I am getting lots of SPAM

Hello, recently I am getting loads of spam, more than usual. I have the following RBLs. reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client all.spamrats.com any recommendation? Bayes Headers: X-Spam

Re: bayes score no showing up in the header

Thank you very much John, I tried this chown -R vscan:vscan /var/spool/amavis/.spamassassin and now bayes score are showing up in the headers. Also, i tried the right sa- database. Thanks a bunch. On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:12 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, motty cruz wr

Re: bayes score no showing up in the header

I run over 800 Ham and 1200 SPAM messages any idea? Thanks On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:14 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, motty cruz wrote: > > here is the header: >> >> >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.243 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3 >>

bayes score no showing up in the header

here is the header: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mydomain.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 5.243 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.243 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3 tests=[DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.804, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, INVALID_DATE=0.432, MISSI