Thank you all for your help, suggestions.
per your suggestions MTA and SA tweaked and already seen a huge difference.
Thanks again!
On 04/11/2018 09:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 04/10/2018 03:49 PM, Motty Cruz wrote:
I apologize here is the email headers and body
https://pastebin.com/bgXrfKaQ
On 10.04.18 16:28, David Jones wrote:
Content analysis details: (16.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
4.2 RCVD_IN_IVMBL_LASTEXTERNAL RBL: No description available.
[178.62.193.238 listed in
sip.invaluement.com]
5.2 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 0.9996]
3.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 0.9996]
1.2 ENA_RELAY_IN Relayed through India
0.0 MISSING_MIME_HB_SEP BODY: Missing blank line between MIME
header and
body
2.2 ENA_RELAY_NOT_US Relayed from outside the US and not on
whitelists
0.0 ENA_BAD_SPAM Spam hitting really bad rules.
Since most ofthose rules are 3rd party and other have tuned scores, it's
quite expected that the mail scored 3.5.
(BAYES_999 was apparently not hit, it would score 3.7 then).
we sometimes must accept that a FP appears.
otherwise, there would be no spam and no discussion here :-)
