Im using freebsd, postfix and spamassassin.
I made a script that runs once every night and scans my imap spam folder
for emails and if there is any i run sa-learn --spam on the email.
My question is, after i scan the email, can i delete the email?
Sure, just put it into your script to delete t
Just looking for some my.cnf example files for SA.
Server has 4 gigs of ram, dual core CPU. What do I want in my my.cnf file?
locate my-huge.cnf
:-)
Hi, I have an issue where much of my site's incoming
mail is being tagged as {SPAM?} when it's not.
You're using MailScanner. It's probably in there. Look if you're still
using ORDB. :-)
00 * * * * /usr/bin/sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel
sought.rules.yerp.org --gpgkey D1C035168C1EBC08464946DA258CDB3ABDE9DC10
--channel saupdates.openprotect.com --channel updates.spamassassin.org
--allowplugins
Am I missing anything?
Beside the other comments, throw something like
Not "nearly impossible." I work daily with people who run servers
exactly like that, yet spam of all sorts is spewing from their mail
queues. Most of the ones I see are SMTP accounts with weak passwords.
The spammers authenticate as the users and bam, the server is a spam source.
With Exim this
I have heavy issues with HOTMAIL since they reject ANY legitim messages
as SPAM without any reason. All of my 50 Servers are worldwide and in
different subnets. It is nearly impossible that all 50 Servers have
spamed HOTMAIL, since my servers accept only authenticated SMTP from
clients.
Not "n
My server has 8GB of ram, around 4 GB is currently used by spamassassin
(too many process of /usr/bin/perl -T /usr/local/psa/admin/sbin/spammng
-c -C --max-children=1 start).
Is this normal? Can I somehow limit the process concurrency of
spamassassin or I could limit the amount of RAM it consu
Just a thought. I'm wondering if there are any clues the th received
lines that indicate the MTA that might be used for spam detection, or
rather ham detection. Do spammers ever use Exim, Qmail, Postfix?
Yes, when they compromise someone's SMTP authentication and send with
whatever they're usi
Some approaches I've taken:
* Set the autolearn thresholds low enough that most messages would be
learned. Not as accurate as human learning, but requires little effort.
* Set the minimum and maximum messages learned settings down to about 50
from their default 200. Not as accurate, but requi
http://ipadmin.junkemailfilter.com/rdns.php
You might want to bookmark this page. Try it out and see if your RDNS is
really correct.
Or another tool from someone who's not trying to sell you something:
http://www.boxcheck.com/
Use the "3-way" check from the middle drop-down. It also confirms
I work for a large managed hosting company. One of my fellow techs saw a
customer put the following in their /etc/mail/local.cf:
score AWL -100
He asked me (I have a reputation as the local SA "expert") what would
happen, and I couldn't figure it out. I figure it would either override
the dyn
Anyone else getting these when they post?
Check the Received headers. There's no server that doesn't have a
dweezil.us hostname. It never left your network.
As opposed to preprocessing before using SA to reduce the load. (ie.
using blacklist and whitelist before SA)
SMTP -> Sendmail, which uses these to reject:
GreetPause
RBL: zen.spamhaus.org
RBL: dynablock.njabl.org
RBL: dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
RBL: bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org
RBL: bl.
1) How can we train the spamassassin using bayesian to FILTER ALL
OUTGOING AS WELL AS INCOMING messages from my server.
That depends on your MTA. Some make it easy (Postfix), some make it
difficult (Sendmail), some you just shouldn't be using (Qmail). (That
last one was a joke, people.)
2)
/me continues to wait for the spammers to tire of greylisting
I work for a managed hosting provider, and I have seen spam messages get
back customers' greylisting setups. It may be isolated, but some
spammers are already starting to work around it.
Thanks for everyone's suggestions. I've taken most of them and done
some other tuning; I'll have to wait and see how much things have
improved. If they haven't improved much, I'll be back on Monday. :)
I'm a little late to the party, and this is sorta off-topic, but you may
want to check this
***If you could get your CIO (or top management) to understand one thing,
just ONE thing, about fighting spam, what would it be?***
This sounds too fatalistic, but I have one simple thing I wished people
understood:
You cannot stop all spam, at least not without causing collateral damage
to
Before my actual question, here's a little background. Right now, I see how
pointless SPF is; few domains publish records, even fewer MTAs running in
the wild use SPF to accept/reject mail. When I look at the SPF scoring on my
server (where I'm running an SPF milter for Sendmail), most of the ma
Until the spammers build in retry into their bots, I'm a
firm believer of greylisting.
They have. I'm a sys admin at a major hosting provider, and I've seen it
in action on at least one customer's box who was using greylisting.
Considering spammers have near-infinite resources, it was only a m
Until the spammers build in retry into their bots, I'm a
firm believer of greylisting.
They have. I'm a sys admin at a major hosting provider, and I've seen it in
action on at least one customer's box who was using greylisting. Considering
spammers have near-infinite resources, it was only a m
How would, where would a mail transfer agent tell you the
mail delivery agent for a the system at hand?...
Just connect to port 25 and observe the banner. Not 100% foolproof, but most
of them either identify themselves (Sendmail) or have a recognizable banner
(Postfix, Qmail, Exchange).
First thing: find the patch for the URIBL rules and get that enabled. It
will probably catch 90% of the spam making it through.
Thanks for the suggestions. Actually, I was mistaken; the server that
prompted this request had 2.61 installed. I upgraded him to 2.64, and
tracked down the SpamCopU
I work for a large hosting provider. Some of our hosting accounts are
(effectively) stuck using SA 2.63, since they are using older Redhat
installs coupled with older versions of the Plesk control panel. (Why
stuck? Because Plesk and ES2.1 won't recognize post-2 versions, provide
proper startup
I can't recall seeing any mention in this thread of DBmail (dbmail.org),
which already exists and is an all-in-one SMTP/POP3/IMAP server with MySQL
or Postgres message storage (with support for SQLite on the way). It's been
in development for three or four years, and from what I remember is used
Did you restart whatever service does the spam filtering after you added the
rule?
- Original Message -
From: "Rosenbaum, Larry M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:04
Subject: Why does this rule not hit?
Why does this rule:
body ORNL_STOCKT_N2 /H o l l
Yes, I've received this communication in error. A unsubscribe command
never goes to the list. It goes to the unsubscribe address specified in
the headers, in this case:
It's odd... I think it's been 7 or 8 years since I used a mailing list
where subscribe/unsubscribe commands were supposed to
Personally, I have those two rules zero-scored in my local.cf. Even
though I
like RFCI, and use their bogusmx and dsn lists at the MTA level, these
two
create too many false positives.
You cannot trust any of the rfc-ignorant.org lists, they list whole TLDs
just
because they don't like somet
Event though hotmail.com domain has a abuse address and a postmaster
address, why do mails from hotmail.com domain get
trigerred for these tests
0.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
Because it's listed on both of those lists at rfc-ignorant.org:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/looku
>Are you looking to catch a particular type of spam? Most people with an
up-to-date SpamAssassin version and a complement of SARE rules are
either looking to catch something specific or are looking to fix a
mis-configuration.
Daryl
Im basically trying to build a better spam filtering box then
So - if I wanted to set up my own RBL for others to query me, how would I
do that? I'm seriously thinking about it. Alternatively, I can stream my
spam to anyone else who is already doing it. I've modified my spam stream
to exclude stuff already listed in several other popular block lists.
I'm
I guess the subject line says it all. I'm running SA 3.1.1 with Bayes stored
in MySQL. Is it possible to learn messages as a "global" user and have the
tokens apply when evaluating individual users' email? (Never mind if it
would be truly effective; this is more of a theoretical question.)
Soo.yesterday I decided to get gutsy and use just about all the
rules from SARE. Here's my rulesdujour config:
TRUSTED_RULESETS="ANTIDRUG BLACKLIST BLACKLIST_URI BOGUSVIRUS RANDOMVAL
SARE_ADULT SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM SARE_BML SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
SARE_EVILNUMBERS1 SARE_EVILNUMBERS2 SARE_FRAUD SA
I agree with the Theo. 3.1 is too low. You don't want to reject real
mail.
1) Use the network/dns tests.
2) increase the score on individual rules especially those for URIBL
score URIBL_WS_SURBL 5.5
score URIBL_SBL 5.5
score URIBL_OB_SURBL 5.5
score DRUGS_ERECTILE 5.0
Study the mails to see wha
I have spent two days trying to figure out how to get the following to
work. I have set up Spamassassin and ClamAV, I am running sendmail on
the Solaris 10 platform. I would like to be able to scan for all spam
and virus (in, out and relayed email). Can someone please point me in
the right dire
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM
%OFHAM
1DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 8894313.50 15.85 12.68
25.27
2. Once the server has received the email, it then scans the email and
compares it to a list of rules. Every time a rule is matched, the server
adds points to the email.
3. When the server completes the scan of the email, it takes the total
number of points assigned to that email and compares tha
We are getting a lot of spam where the sender domain name changes, but the
sender always starts with a specific string.
We've only done a little bit of custom rule writing. How do we do a rule
to get
the sender starting with a specific string?
You could probably just do something like this:
I would appreciate any guidance that you feel would make my SA setup
stronger. These types of messages (attached) keep squeaking through...
is my setup weak or have I broken something? To the layman's eye, they
look pretty spammy.
I am running v3.0.2 and I just went through all the SARE updates
pushed it over the required hits threshold. Sound good? So, out of 163
spam
messages, here's the files that pushed spams over the edge (files with no
rules that pushed over the threshold are omitted):
Correction: that should've been 3481 spam messages.
Mike, I suspect you are using the wrong criterion in removing some of the
rules. Unfortunately none of the log readers seem to store the most
interesting bit of information. How many times did the SARE rules make a
critical difference between marking a spam message as spam? I find they
are a criti
Mike, I suspect you are using the wrong criterion in removing some of the
rules. Unfortunately none of the log readers seem to store the most
interesting bit of information. How many times did the SARE rules make a
critical difference between marking a spam message as spam? I find they
are a criti
That seems fine - I'd expect that for a package like SpamAssassin, the
default rules (plus Razor and Pyzor) would be very good at identifying
spam. However, this was the part that surprised me:
Sorry to reply to my own post, and before anyone had a chance to. I tried
this on my personal server
Matt Kettler's advice in the "Good ruleset" thread made me wonder just how
many spams the various rule files I'm using actually catch. So, I wrote a
quick Perl script to look at the rule files and check a stat script's output
(against today's logs) for the rules that spam messages matched, then
You can also impose this cost on spammers by enabling the GreetPause
feature in the more recent versions of sendmail. This tells sendmail not
to answer right away when receiving a connection, and to drop the
connection if anything is received before the greeting is sent out. This
punishes "slammer
I suppose I shouldn't be shocked by this but it surprised me to receive
some spam sent with Mailman.
I have a folder for catching all mailing list mail that doesn't yet have
its own procmail rule. The catch-all procmail rule looks for anything with
a List-Id header and dumps it in ~/mail/Lists/Un
The question is does FreeBSD make binary package updates, or are security
updates source-patch only.
From what I've observed, the base OS updates are source-patch only, at least
until the next full FreeBSD release. Anything that's in the ports tree
should be available as either a source update
My "personal" server runs FreeBSD along with Sendmail, procmail, and
Courier-IMAP. My employer's servers run Redhat Enterprise Linux along with
Sendmail, procmail, and Courier-IMAP. I'm much more comfortable with
FreeBSD, which is why I continue to use it on my own system. At work, we got
roped
I created a script to auto learn spam every hour, I want the script to
auto start spamd if its not running.
Auto start line is:
ps -auxwww | grep spamd | grep -v grep >> /dev/null || '/usr/bin/
spamd -d --syslog=/var/log/spamd.log &'
Error I get when running and spamd is off is:
/usr/bin/lear
Well, I was off on Vancouver Island for nearly a week, and didn't take a
laptop with me... Clearly it caused some major trauma because I had the
following hallucinatory idea:
I was thinking about the issue in which sending spam isn't a crime in a
lot
of countries, or if it is that it's poorly
Many thanks to everyone for the helpful suggestions so far! I've managed
to
patch together a Bash script that is close to what I'd like. Currently
it's
just dumping out the magic data, for testing purposes.
As a note, simplying using the -u doesn't work as sa-learn
attempts
to use the bayes d
I'm hoping that somebody here has done what I'm attempting to do.
My users use a web-mail front end for reading email. There is an option to
Mark-As-Spam which moves the message into a SPAM folder and removes it
from
their current folder. Very easy to train even the most inexperienced users
to
- Original Message -
From: "Liam-PrintingAutomation" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 07:36
Subject: SA just stopped working
I installed spamassassin not long ago on our server, and it worked great!
Then sometime in the last couple of weeks it appears to have
> You have an older version of the stock rules. Doc fixed this
> one a week or two ago, since we knew it was going to come up.
Weird. rules_du_jour did not grab the newer version.
I had the same issue. I deleted the stock ruleset, ran rules_du_jour again,
and everything was fine.
Obvious t
I'm still working on my server that is having problems with running
spamassassin 3.10 and exim 4.60. Currently the command I run is
spamd -d -c
-m 5 to have it use 5 child processes. Is there some sort of recommended
ratio to amount of processed email to how many max child processes I
should
And I note that the .67 machine alias "prop.hfradio.org" includes a
comments page. That script could be vulnerable if updates to the OS
are not fully installed.
I've done quite a bit of buttoning up, here. I'll take a closer look at
this, too.
Maybe this is obvious, but from experience, mak
- Original Message -
From: "spamassassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 10:23
Subject: server reached --max-clients setting, consider raising it
Hello
I'm new to spamassassin and need some help.
First spamassassin is version 3.0.1 on mac OSX 10.3.9 running o
Spamd startup options - "-d -q -m 50 -x --
siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin -i xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -A xxx.xxx.xxx.
-u spamd"
There's a disconnect between the spamd man page and what the error log
reports. What you're looking to change is the -m option in your startup. The
man page lists that
I don't believe what SORBS is doing fits the legal definition of
extortion... no matter how you spell it. :-) There is no threat of
either violence or criminal wrong doing and SORBS is operating a legal
service...
From dictionary.com:
1. The act or an instance of extorting.
2. Illegal use o
After reading Mike's emailing about AOL, this stuck out:
I reject mail at the MTA level that's from IPs or domains listed in
Spamhaus (both SBL and
XBL) and bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org (the only one of their lists I trust
not
to cause false positives when used in this manner).
I think xbl-sbl is
I tried that Matthew. It too was changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I haven't tried is removing the @aol.com.
In a mailing list manager app I wrote, I simply put a MD5 hash of the
address in the headers. Then I have something to check against the
subscriber list that AOL would never remove fr
I know this isn't directly related to SpamAssassin, but I'm hoping you sys
admins will have some advice to share...
Here's the situation. I'm the sys admin for a web hosting/design company.
We're using Sendmail, with SpamAssassin invoked from procmail. I reject mail
at the MTA level that's fro
Feb 22 11:45:42 ronin spamd[3322]: bayes: unable to connect to database:
Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket
'/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (13)
Is that where mysql.sock is located? I don't know where the MySQL RPMs might
stick it, but source installs stick it at /tmp/mysql.sock by
I am running spamd/spamc and have spamc launching with "-t
55". Yet I'm finding that scans are taking as long as 798
seconds to complete, not alot of them but the question is
why isn't it timing out?
Any suggestions on what to look for?
spamc -t only controls the timeout of the spamc client. s
Try adding a -D to the init.d spamd call and see if it gives you any more
info on why it's failing.
Thanks for the quick reply. I did use the -D option and it doesn't give
anymore information at all. Basically the error is contained in these two
lines (and I have to paraphrase a little because
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to
my
account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It
looks
like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine with kernel 2.4.21-37.
I was doing some reading and I am beginning to look into Rules Du Jour. I
see there are quite a large number of rulesets to choose from when
utilizing
this. Does anyone have any advice on what ones would be safe?
I use these:
SARE_ADULT
SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM
SARE_FRAUD
SARE_HEADER0
SARE_HEA
I would rather use wget than curl (curl has too many pre-reqs)
Sorry not to answer the question and go off on an tangent, but what
requirements does curl have that you can't install? If you build from
source, about the only requirement that may not be on any stock system would
be OpenSSL, and
> Looking at the headers above, if the SPF record for customer.com does
> not allow mail to come from 84.152.113.90, then the check will fail.
OK, but how can people ever send e-mail then? That server is very alone
somewhere in a dark room, seeing no daylight until the end of his life.
Hard to im
Does anyone have any good techniques for capturing a sample of ham that
can be used as the ham corpus. I'm in a corporate environment and am not
keen on the idea of intercepting non-spam messages. I will if I have to,
but was hoping someone had a better idea.
Depending on your MTA/MDA, you m
spamd: handled cleanup of child pid 19888 due to SIGCHLD
spamd[5262]: prefork: child states: II
I see a lot of mention of these messages showing up in 3.1, but I have
not seen a definitive answer as to if I need to pay more attention to
them or they are just a minor/visual annoyance in the logs a
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL
%OFSPAM %OFHAM
1
HTML_MESSAGE 45870 5.13 27.72 70.37
55.36
Wait... so 27% of all mail is HTML, 70% of spam is HTML, and 55% of
ham is HTML?
That
Kristopher Austin wrote:
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM
%OFHAM
1HTML_MESSAGE 45870 5.13 27.72 70.37
55.36
Wait... so 27% of all mail is HTML, 70% of spam is HTML, a
sa-stats.pl, there is more than one version. I got mine from the Sare
Ninjas as I use daemon tools to run spamd. I don't know where the other
one can be found or what the difference is.
Google, or use these list archives for more info.
I've had one off-list request for this so far, so I'll se
I use the other sa-stats script, which I modified to show stats on the
rules:
Top spam rules:Ham: Spam: % Ham: % Spam:
--
RAZOR2_CHECK 90 1098 4.32 68.33
RAZOR
I want to get some adives about RAZOR / DCC / Pyzor usage ! I don't know
how many people is using they but I need some advise ?
- I think that DCC and RAZOR will improve spam finding , right ?
at this moment I know that querying will take a time but How many
spamcleanhouse we should u
This is a new one for me. Today I've received some mail with "hey john"
in the subject, and the mail otherwise appears blank. It didn't contain a
virus, or it would've been discarded by ClamAV.
Are these familiar to you guys? What's the point of them? Headers of one
below: Thanks! - John
we have some lists on a server maintained by mailman. since mails for
moderators contains offten spammy content, those mails are rated as spam
too. i tried whitelisting with for example:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
whitelist_from_rcvd
I am using spamassasin in .procmailrc (unix account).
my question is about .procmailrc:
is .procmailrc synchronized? I mean, if two new mails are coming to my
accout, will the first .procmailrc script execution finish before the
second execution will start?
I am trying to do something so the or
You could write it as a header rule, like...
header ANNOYING_SPAMMER Received =~ /193\.95\.75\.135/
describe ANNOYING_SPAMMER Mark mail from 193.95.75.135 as spam
score ANNOYING_SPAMMER 5
If you have control over your MTA, you might investigate using its mechanism
to block mail from that IP. Fo
Hello all.. Novice SA Admin here (well, none of my users complain - wait..
I have none, just me). I recently read something that says sa-learn is
learned for the user who runs sa-learn. I've always run sa-learn as root.
Is there a easy way to copy the contents of what's been learned from root
to m
On the servers I admin, the user preferences are stored in SQL, yet sa-learn
insists on there being a .spamassassin directory in the users' home
directory, creating it and a default user_prefs file if they do not exist.
Why? What does it need the prefs for? Can it use the SQL preferences? Is
th
I am wondering if anyone can direct me to any books/sites/etc regarding
possibly running postfix on one or more servers accepting mail, processing
with SA, then forwarding onto a 3rd machine.
Currently my setup only includes one Postfix box, which does all of the
mail
filtering (with spamassass
> > how do i tell SA on the other server not to touch my mails at all?
> > SA is invoked from within qmail there.
>
> You would have to tell qmail not to invoke SA for your messages.
>
> But why is it a problem? When you run SA on your server, it should
> automatically remove the markup added by
Do you recommend running airmax as a supplementary ruleset with 3.1.0?
This is just my humble opinion, but I don't know if that's a ruleset I would
use in production for a multi-user server. A few of the rules use the
"f-word" in the rule description line, so it would go out in a verbose
repo
I recently got an FP for an (opted in) gfi.com newsletter.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.454 required=5 tests=[BLANK_LINES_70_80=1.236,
DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.44,
DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=0.879,
FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=1.052, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126,
MIME_BOUND_
Aaron Boyles wrote:
Actually, no, I can't. I get that message with Yahoo as well. I vaguely
remember running into this issue before, and it having something to do
with
using Windows 2K3 server behind NAT. As I recall at the time, it was
decided that the 'solution' was far more work than it w
Personally, I use SpamAssassin on my personal E-Mail server (which is
hosted
by someone else for me, and is a Linux server) and I love it. I'm
particularly depressed that as long as it's been in development, nobody's
thought to simplify the install process. Heck, the "installing on
windows"
p
But the reality of the numbers won't stop the FTC from tooting it's own
horn and claiming victory.. Unfortunately for us, this will likely result
in some major spammers unleashing a mass-scale deluge just to show they're
wrong. The best I think we can hope for is that a few of them might get
re
7;t be too terribly difficult to maintain, and I wouldn't think you'd
need to retain history for very long.
On 12/15/05 12:48 PM, "Mike Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been trying to find a script which would allow me to copy data
from spamd logfile to
I have been trying to find a script which would allow me to copy data
from spamd logfile to MySQL database. It would be usefull, since then I
could provide datailed statistics to my users.
Does anybody know a way to do it or I will just have to write a small
script myself? Has anyone probably don
Someone posted an update to a stats collecting program, I
think it was this list I saw it on. The post was about two
weeks ago, I don't recall the name of the program but want
to take another look at it.
Anyone know what I"m talking about?...
I don't think this is the one you're thinking of, bu
is there a way to store global filter rules in
mysql?
I have written an web frontend for administering spamassassin
rules.
But at the moment i got the problem to store all rules in one file
(it's to big and makes the server slow).
i searched with google, but i found just solutions to store
userp
When mail is processed by SA ( spamc/spamd from procmail in this example),
it adds all the X-Spam headers at the beginning of the mail (prepend).
I don't want to be one of those jerks who tells you to read the list
archives for an answer, but I know this subject has been raised several
times s
With due respect... if you're not using per-user preferences then you're
not using per-user rules either, so what is the point of storing them in
MySQL?
How often do they need to be edited, and by whom?
Good reasons not to: there's no support for it that I know of, so you'll
have to write it y
twtelecom is staffed by morons, like most other large providers.
Eh, I wouldn't go so far as to say they're morons. They're just
near-sighted. They'll do whatever they need to do - and no more - to protect
their own interests without considering the implications for others on the
net. Take AO
Thanks to another thread today, I discovered the sa-update script (which
must be new, or I haven't noticed it in 3+ years of using SA). However, when
I try to run it on two separate boxes, I get debug output similar to this
(when invoked with no command line options other than -D):
[8348] dbg:
I saw a post earlier today about using fetchmail to grab external emails
and run them through your local SA filters. Can anyone explains or point
me in the right direction to find out how to do that?
I would like to use fetchmail to get mail from an external server and have
it run through my serv
When manually applying the filters "Mark as SPAM" or "Mark as HAM", which
pipe
the message to the command sa-learn --spam or sa-learn --ham respectively,
it
takes up to a minute to process on a PIV 4.3Ghz HT with 1Gb of RAM, which
seems like ages.
I've noticed that the SQL backends to Bayes an
Perhaps this is too much to ask of SpamAssassin, but...
My server receives a piece of spam that's undeliverable. It looks up the
MX for the sender's address, and finds that the IP is 127.0.0.1. It then
complains that there's a configuration problem because it's not set up to
handle mail for th
Perhaps this is too much to ask of SpamAssassin, but...
My server receives a piece of spam that's undeliverable. It looks up the MX
for the sender's address, and finds that the IP is 127.0.0.1. It then
complains that there's a configuration problem because it's not set up to
handle mail for th
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
