uld run a local MySQL database, replicated from a
master. Writes to the master over TCP, reads from local slave over UNIX
socket...
Mike
--
| Mike Grice Broadband Solutions for
| Systems Engineer Home & Business @
| PlusNet plc. www.plus.net
+ - PlusNet - The smarter way to broadband --
t, but doing multiple writes to a database
for every mail passing through a system is a real resource glutton (and
so I have to have them disabled).
Users have problems with the above method because they don't like extra
stuff in their message (if the DSPAM-ID is at the
ould be
providers out there that could mirror the site without worrying too
much?
Cheers
Mike
--
| Mike Grice Broadband Solutions for
| Systems Engineer Home & Business @
| PlusNet plc. www.plus.net
+ - PlusNet - The smarter way to broadband --
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 10:49 -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Mike Grice wrote:
> >
> > Nope, but think of how it would scale. The design above is bad because
> > there is no unique data in there, so the table will get slow. A bette
pref4
1 bob 1 0 0 1
I'm looking into integrating user prefs this quarter where I work, and I
do have some concerns on how it will scale (e.g., with mysql replication
you need to send writes to a different machine from reads if you need to
have seperate database
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 11:58 +0100, Mike Grice wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm running SA 3.0.2 via spamc/spamd on an Exim mail server, but I'm
> finding I quickly run out of memory and the machine collapses into a
> burning heap as soon as it touches swap.
>
> Is th
Hi there,
I'm running SA 3.0.2 via spamc/spamd on an Exim mail server, but I'm
finding I quickly run out of memory and the machine collapses into a
burning heap as soon as it touches swap.
Is there a rule of thumb of how many SA daemons to prefork to the amount
of RAM? The boxes currently have
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:19 -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Mike Grice wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 04:37 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> >
> > This I know (I'm a sysadmin ;-)), what I'm getting at is why would SA
> > time it out? The system should use the h
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 05:16 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2005, 5:12:37 AM, Mike Grice wrote:
> > why would SA
> > time it out? The system should use the hostfile in preference to DNS
> > (e.g., in nsswitch.conf), but for some bizarre reason this lookup
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 04:37 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2005, 4:26:46 AM, Mike Grice wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 03:55 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> >> On Thursday, April 21, 2005, 3:46:35 AM, Mike Grice wrote:
>
> >> >>From /etc/hosts:
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 03:55 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2005, 3:46:35 AM, Mike Grice wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 03:01 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
>
> >> Did you remember to forward the queries for your local zones to
> >> the rbldnsd server
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 03:01 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2005, 2:40:49 AM, Mike Grice wrote:
> > I then began to mirror the RBLs that we use (and SURBLS) to speed things
> > up, but for some reason I'm now getting an RBL timeout. The way I did
> > t
Hi there,
I'm trialling SA for use in our customer spamfiltering. I'm concerned
about it's speed (due to the amount of mail we handle), so I ran in
debug mode. As I suspected, the greatest delay is when the app has to
callout to the net, e.g., RBL lookups and the like.
I then began to mirror
13 matches
Mail list logo
