Re: Bayes

with bayes_sql_override_username bayes So if either "spamd" user or your own runs it  ... you should get the same result ... ( I'm actually running it in PgSQL, can't remember what the file based is called ) mvh Mikael Syska On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 19:35:16 +0100 Jerry Malcolm wro

Re: some people get high score

Hi, On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:38 PM, richard lucassen < mailingli...@lucassen.org> wrote: > Hello list, > > I've been using SA for a log time now an it has always been working > perfectly well. It runs on a bunch of Postfix servers that handle > hundreds of thousands mails per day. I'm certainly

Re: help

If you dying, then please call 911/112 or maybe just 114(in DK) if you need police assistance. On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Chris Hunt wrote: >

Re: autolearn

subject was empty with a link starting with "ftp:" > > I guess it's the autolearn that is most puzzling me. What is your "bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam" set to in local.cf ? > > joe a. > mvh Mikael Syska

Re: increase score according message size

x MB at the MTA level? Then legit senders would still get a mesesage why there mail was rejected. Just discarding large mails seems to me like a very bad discision. > > Best regeads mvh Mikael Syska

Re: Suddenly tons of spam

Hi, On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:07 PM, missingshrink wrote: > > Not to hijack this thread - but I am experiencing the same issue. Well ... same problem. > > > I too - started experiencing tons of spam getting through since a few weeks > ago. Okay. > In the past hour, 18 messages were not correct

Re: Suddenly tons of spam

Hi, On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Max wrote: > Thanks but yeah it is running. I get a spam score on my messages. I'm going > to change my required spam cutoff score though 3.6 is very low and on my servers I would get way to many false positives. I'm running at 5.6 If that is the only rules

Re: Suddenly tons of spam

Hi, On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Max wrote: > Hey, I know this message is kind of vague but I set up spamassassin a > while ago. It's been working great for a long time, but then out of no > where we started getting 127 or so spam messages per day. Could someone > point me in the right direct

Re: low score for ($1.5Million)

Hi, I get the following hits: Content analysis details: (19.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low

Re: scantime=249.2; scantime=175.0; scantime=190.9; scantime=68.9

:46 localhost spamd[15797]: prefork: sysread(8) not ready, > wait max 300 secs I have never used spamd before ... but I would look into that process and debug it ... >From what i could bing/google from the above message ... it could be because of a timeout because of some permissions issue. mvh Mikael Syska

Re: Help with new rule, and local.cf

Hi, There is allready a few threads about this ... http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/153560?do=post_view_threaded mvh On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:44 AM, cviebrock wrote: > > I'm trying to write a rule to catch a bunch of spam I'm getting recently that > contain only an .RTF

Re: Yerp connection issues

Hi, On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > Anyone else seeing the following in their cron logs: > > http: GEThttp://yerp.org:8080/rules/stage/330948267.tar.gz  request failed: > 500 Can't connect to yerp.org:8080 (connect: Connection refused): 500 Can't > connect to yerp.org

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

Hi, Yes, we are unfortunately one of the bad guess atm, and I want to change that ... so hopefully this will give Exchange users and idea how to fight it, if they are using this kind of setup. 2010/5/19 Karsten Bräckelmann : > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 23:13 +0200, Mikael Syska wrote: >&g

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

ill be a good how-to but it looks good; take a look. > http://www.debuntu.org/postfix-and-pamassassin-how-to-filter-spam > mvh Mikael Syska

Re: access to Bayes in PostgreSQL DB broken

Hi, Have you looked in the sql for postgres ? Have the structure changed? That would be my first step to make sure. ( I'm using InnoDB MySQL ) and between 3.2.5 and 3.1.1 only some Indexes changed ... but I can see you come from a very very old version I think. mvh On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:43 P

Re: Limit SA to scan messages 100k and below

n the queue ? > I may be wrong in my troublshooting methods but I'm not sure why this is > happeninig at present. > > Many Thanks > > > > > On 31 March 2010 13:30, Mikael Syska wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Keith De Souza

Re: Limit SA to scan messages 100k and below

or ... But are there are reason for dropping it? > Many Thanks in advance > > > mvh Mikael Syska

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.1 available

3.2.5, Is it safe to update via CPAN and still retain compatibility with > apt-get/aptitude? Since the last version before 3.3.0 was 3.2.5 ... its not outdated ... but yes, its old ... > > Cheers! > > > muh Mikael Syska

Re: Sa-update

Hi, See this link for a way to train bayes, when using exchange. mvh On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: >>The main problem is the BAYES_00 rule.  Apparently, your bayes db thinks this >>email is definitely not spam.  Are you sure it is being trained prope

Re: bayes, numbers of tokens and performance

Hi On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:20 PM, tonjg wrote: > > > Mikael Syska wrote: >> >> Does it help when you sa-learn the spams ? Does it change the BAYES_ >> score for that mail ? > I'm going to do another sa-learn when I hit 100 more spams and I'll see

Re: bayes, numbers of tokens and performance

that ended up in my inbox. Needs to be all kinds of spam and ham ... but I guess thats in place. > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/bayes%2C-numbers-of-tokens-and-performance-tp27940005p27940352.html > Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > muh Mikael Syska

Re: bayes, numbers of tokens and performance

ing ... > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/bayes%2C-numbers-of-tokens-and-performance-tp27940005p27940005.html > Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > mvh Mikael Syska http://ifyoudo.net

Re: How to find where email server has been blacklisted

Hi On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Brian wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 10:51 +0100, Mikael Syska wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Then something is broken at your end ... >> >> I see 4 icons ... timeout, listed, non-listed  and offline. >> >> Or am I missin

Re: How to find where email server has been blacklisted

icons, and I see the listed and not-listed icons as identical. > > -Original Message----- > From: Mikael Syska [mailto:mik...@syska.dk] > Sent: 08 March 2010 01:56 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: How to find where email server has been blacklisted > > H

Re: How to find where email server has been blacklisted

Hi, This sites works for me: http://whatismyipaddress.com/staticpages/index.php/is-my-ip-address-blacklisted mvh On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Rops wrote: > > Hello > > I'm trying to figure out why some emails get lost, which most likely is due > to emails killed by ISP spam filter due to hig

Re: is bayes learning?

Hi, [r...@freebsd ]# sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 22 0 non-token data: nham 0.000 0793 0 non-token data: nto

Re: Spamassassin, no new version ?

Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Stephane MAGAND wrote: > Hi > > Since Jun 2008, he don't have a new version of spamassassin ? the project > are dead ? Are you even reading the mailing list? or 3.3.0 should published soon. > I wan change my mail server, actually with a old version of spama

Re: SA Tag Spam from compromised web mails

Hi, You use the mailserver - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sieve_%28mail_filtering_language%29 And all are happy and can do what they want ... add the tag to the subject ... remove it. Personal pref can be made ... mvh On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Jeff Koch wrote: > > Of course an iPhone c

Re: SA Tag - Spam from compromised web mails

n they are also applied to all mail ... whether how many diff clients you are using ... I really dont see you problem Jeff ... if its nice to have ... make your what ever server your are using add them ... its 2010 as you said. :-) > >> >> >> Kind regards, >> --Toni++ >> > > Best Regards, > > Jeff Koch, Intersessions > mvh Mikael Syska

Re: Spam hitting Bayes_99?

Hi, I'm wondering ... this is spam right or ? Its score like this here: 1.5 RCVD_IN_SPAMCANNIBAL RBL: www.spamcannibal.org [72.55.156.38 listed in bl.spamcannibal.org] 1.8 BARRACUDA_BRBL RBL: Listed: Barracuda Reputation Block List (BRBL)

Re: LashBack URL / BL?

Hi, I'm not sure about all the diff black list options ... but I guess it would be rather easy to test it . header RCVD_IN_LASHBACK eval:check_rbl('LASHBACK','ubl.unsubscore.com') describe RCVD_IN_LASHBACK lashback tflags RCVD_IN_LASHBACK net score RCVD_IN_LASHBACK 0.0 Would this be the r

Re: dccifd and spamassassin

Hi, from the mailscanner page: http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:anti_spam:spamassassin:plugins:dcc:dccifd_install&do=diff1162335096 Dccifd(8) is similar to dccproc but is not run separately for each mail message and so is far more efficient. It receives mail messages v

Re: Spam PDF

ybe training bayes better or increasing the score will put and end to this for you. arni Any aditional reading on bayes are welcome ... // Mikael Syska

Re: razor and pyzor

Phil Barnett wrote: On Sunday 13 May 2007 23:25, Gary V wrote: On Sunday 13 May 2007 12:28, Gary V wrote: Thanks for the excellent notes! The run 'pyzor discover'. This creates /root/.pyzor/servers which is a file that contains the IP address and port to the main pyzor server. Don't use th

Re: FUZZY_OCR find words that not exist on image

Hey, Try upgrading ...: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Downloads As it states on the page itself ... 2.3 is deprecated guess must are using 3.x version ... I'm using 3.5.1 two places with out problems // ouT Rejaine Monteiro wrote: sorry by my poor english.. maybe I'm not understan