> On Nov 9, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Emanuel wrote:
> I am interested in seeing the bayes info in the database, because it was
> created years ago
>
>
There does exist a plugin, that allows you to fill in the actual text for the
hashed value.
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UnmaintainedCust
Jesse,
Thanks for the report. For sure get this into Bugzilla once you get the
account setup.
Please make sure you include which version of MySQL you are running as well.
The Bayes SQL stuff hasn’t been updated in many many years, it might be that
MySQL changed the permissions for INSERT on D
Apologies if any of this ends up being not so up to date. It’s been ages since
the Check plugin was written.
You’re most likely going to want to write your own Check plugin to change this
behavior.
If you look at check_main you’ll see the DNS based tests get fired off before
the priority loop
On Jul 9, 2013, at 9:18 AM, RW wrote:
>
> I was wondering when perl REs are compiled in spamd. My understanding
> is that perl compiles REs when they are first evaluated. Is anything
> done to make this happen in the spamd parent?
Yes, on startup a fake message is scanned to prime the pump an
On May 8, 2013, at 8:06 AM, Matteo Dessalvi wrote:
>
> I always thought that SA would be able to operate autonomously and that it
> will create the
> proper records in all the tables of the DB. Am I missing something? Is this
> the designed behavior?
>
It's been awhile since I wrote and loo
On May 11, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Jacopo Fabiani wrote:
>
>
> My question is: where do I get wrong? Is there a way to decode encoded token
> that I got with sa-learn --backup command?
>
No, there is no way to decode the bayes tokens.
Search this mailing list several years ago for possible work ar
On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:17 PM, cyboc wrote:
>
> We have been receiving 419 spam with extremely long lists of email addresses
> in the To: header. I'm talking hundreds of addresses.
>
> I've noticed that the same email addresses keep on appearing near my user's
> email address in the To: header.
On Apr 10, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
> I'm running SpamAssassin 3.3.2 port revision 6 (latest from FreeBSD
> ports) on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE 64-bit.
>
> I recently upgraded my Perl from 5.10 to 5.14 but I needed to
> downgrade because SpamAssassin was crashing on a daily basis. See
> bu
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Miguel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm just wondering, is there a limitation on the type of rules that can be
> added to the SpamassAssin rules table?
> Because adding something like (subject scoring):
>
> header TEST_SUBJECT Subject =~ /test/i (I've tried several c
On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Dorian Chan wrote:
> Hello again,
> I've attached version 2.0 with this email (it's the clean version without all
> the comments :) ). I've pretty much finished up the definitions and some
> cleaning up. Again, I would really enjoy feedback!
>
Everywhere you say "
On Oct 29, 2010, at 8:42 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
> affect the outcome.
Why?
Assuming a reasonably fast connection network checks are basically free.
They are kicked off at the start of a scan and the results are co
These might be starting to get dated a little but I think that if you look at
the "Extending Apache SpamAssassin Using Plugin" slides and notes from here:
http://people.apache.org/~parker/presentations/index.html
That will give you a good idea on what you need to accomplish for your plugin.
Mic
On Jan 10, 2010, at 6:58 PM, Robert P. Weaver wrote:
[28414] dbg: replacetags: replacing tags
[28414] dbg: replacetags: done replacing tags
[28414] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /users/
rweaver/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[28414] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /users/
rweaver/.spamassas
FYI, the original bug is here:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
All the bitching about it, took me about 30 seconds to find it.
Michael
On Oct 4, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
We use Spamassassin via spamc/spamd via procmail. In the maillog
file, we see when there is spam, the message indicates a bunch of
information. raddr shows up always as 127.0.0.1, which is our course
our connection to SPAMD from our machine v
On Oct 4, 2009, at 8:56 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
I did some googling, and the more I read, the more apparent that the
documentation is a little light.
So here are the questions that I think are really the 800 pound
elephant in
the room:
* If I do set bayes_auto_expire to 0 and I am using M
On Jul 31, 2009, at 1:55 AM, poifgh wrote:
I ran freshly build SA with Bayes and DNSBL turned off. Why am I not
seeing
a linear increase in the throughput? Is a file locking creating the
bottleneck? If yes, which particular file is being locked? If no,
what could
be the reason for this?
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Eddy Beliveau wrote:
but Ido not find any timing.log file on my current directory or
anywhere on my system!!
Did I missed something ?
I doubt all the necessary hooks are in place for that plugin to work
in 3.2.5, you'd need to run 3.3 to make use of that plu
On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Frank DeChellis wrote:
If anybody has any advice or ideas, please let me know.
This is probably way beyond what you wanted to get into but the Bayes
subsystem has plugin hooks so you could write your own dspam plugin to
use.
I'm not aware of anyone trying i
On Mar 25, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Guido wrote:
I believe it means you should take up this issue with the Amavisd-
new support forum.
Since you are not RUNNING SpamAssassin/spamc/spamd then some parts
of the configuration simply are not made effective in your
situation. You must look for a sol
On Feb 14, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 15:04 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
I would bet on Bayes/userpref queries being more efficient than
the
spamc/spamd traffic.
I like that you are asking the question. But I hate to guess at
which
is better though. The
On Feb 4, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Andre wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.02.09 21:39, Andre wrote:
spamc is never called from Exim in this case, so the --ssl switch
can't be
used. At least that is my understanding (maybe mis-understanding?)
of the
situation.
On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:10 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, January 6, 2009 03:11, Matt Kettler wrote:
Check your .pre files to make sure the shortcircuit plugin is loaded
in one of them. (Note: loadplugin statements added to local.cf will
NOT work, they should be in the .pre files)
is this
On Nov 2, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
I have spamd setup to use bayes in a mysql database, works fine. I've
turned off auto-expiry and instead run a cronjob to expire in the
middle
of the night (removes about 40k tokens on a run). I've made the DB
innoDB so it can handle lockin
On Aug 22, 2008, at 5:36 AM, Eduardo Júnior wrote:
I have an e-mail server 1, which has spamassassin with a basic
Bayesian. And I also have another e-mail server 2, which is another
basic Bayesian.
Can I make a merge of the two bases without an overwrite?
Thus, my new basis would be a un
On Aug 5, 2008, at 7:57 AM, LDB wrote:
Is it possible to re-inject a caught piece email that was
labeled HAM, in spamd or spamc and force it to learn it
as spam for bayes?
Yes.
First read up on the --allow-tell command line switch for spamd, if
you're ok with the "risks" then start spamd
On Jul 15, 2008, at 4:04 AM, Alex Woick wrote:
Paolo De Marco schrieb am 11.07.2008 11:17:
I want to migrate to mysql form my bayes.
I have installed perl modules, mysql and modify local.cf.
When i run amavisd debug i see this lines:
Jul 11 11:16:36 mail.ial.fvg.it /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[1756
On Jul 8, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Adam Harrison wrote:
I put the following in local.cf (passwords obscured):
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::MySQL
bayes_sql_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:sa-db.intelius.com:3306
bayes_sql_username readwrite
bayes_sql_password
On Jun 26, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 23:09, Larry Nedry wrote:
Benny, you might want to read the docs:
docs needs updating, all test i have done is showing this is not
working
so here
Hmmm then you are running a faulty or modified version I guess,
, 2008 21:17, Michael Parker wrote:
Negative numbers come before positive numbers.
nope
order is positive to negative
you might find it is correct by testing more :)
Benny, you might want to read the docs:
<http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
>
O
On Jun 26, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 17:13, ram wrote:
How do I enforce SA to wait for results negative short circuited
rules
of higher priority before shorcicuiting mail as spam due to positive
ones
make priority positive not negative, default all h
On May 28, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I'm using SA with SQL support under Amavid-new. My DBMS is MySQL.
I 'm preparing one another Antispam server and I ve installed the
latest
stable software available.
I ve dumped bayes DB (schema + data) from an already working
On May 27, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Larry Nedry wrote:
Greetings,
This weekend I created a MySQL db to store my bayes tokens. It
seems to be
working well but I'm a little puzzled by the default size of
bayes_expiry_max_db_size. I understand that the default size is
150,000
which seems very lo
On Apr 22, 2008, at 5:31 AM, Christoph Petersen wrote:
He guys,
for my setup I use a MySQL DB as the store for bayes and AWL. Every
process
is opening, querying and closing his own DB connection which results
in
latency and is not necessary.
Really? Thats interesting, in all my tests MyS
On Apr 21, 2008, at 8:40 AM, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Michael Parker wrote:
select * from bayes_vars;
...
2289 rows in set (0.00 sec)
What user do you run bayes under on your MXs?
I think you've found the issue. We run as spamd.
# sa-learn -u spamd --dump
On Apr 21, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
Consequently, my database is growing, apparently without bound.
Any ideas how I can get expiry to work properly again? (Hopefully
without completely dumping the database?)
select * from bayes_vars;
What user do you run bayes under on yo
On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:49 AM, Or Goshen wrote:
Is it possible to use libspamc.so to tell spamd that a message is
either spam or ham ?
ie, imitate "sa-learn --spam/--ham" using libspamc.so.
There dont seem to be any documentation about the library, all I
could find are comments in the header f
On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
It's finally started to remove tokens, so I think I'm OK. We use SQL
bayes, so it was an easy matter to use
~ delete from bayes_token where atime > UNIX_TIMESTAMP();
to clean up the stuff from the future.
But now your bayes_vars table is
On Jan 23, 2008, at 6:37 AM, Rubin Bennett wrote:
Spamd output below:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamd -q -D
[12373] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[12373] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
Can you run this again and this time pass 1-2 msgs through just like
you would normally, instead of j
On Jan 22, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Rubin Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 10:45 -0600, Michael Parker wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Rubin Bennett wrote:
WTF am I doing wrong?!
Not including debug logs in your message.
User prefs does not work with spamassassin, so you won'
On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Rubin Bennett wrote:
WTF am I doing wrong?!
Not including debug logs in your message.
User prefs does not work with spamassassin, so you won't see anything
there, but you should be seeing something for Bayes SQL and AWL SQL if
they are configured correctly.
On Dec 31, 2007, at 10:23 AM, snowcrash+sa wrote:
but bear in mind that it will probably only get attention from
other jail
users
heh. understood. and, expected.
alas, i know it's wasted breath to argue that the prevalence of SA-(&
everything else, for that matter)-in-jails/VMs is on
On Nov 30, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Wes wrote:
Well, spamd is apparently doing things far more efficiently than "sa-
learn
--restore". Tokens are loading into the DB much faster than the
restore,
and postmaster is hardly ever a blip in 'top' (at least so far). When
running the restore, postmaster
On Nov 27, 2007, at 10:16 AM, Rene Caspari wrote:
In my case it is a bug :-)
Because I don't have any chance to get user specified bayes db working
which come from a SQL database.
Its actually a behavior change, at least for me. How are you running
spamd? If you are running with -q or --s
On Nov 19, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Andrew Hearn (AAISP) wrote:
Rene Caspari wrote:
Hi,
I'm using spamassassing 3.2.3 with userspecific rules from an SQL
database:
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf:
user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost
[...]
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAss
cpayne wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I am looking for books on Spamassassin. And I am wanting to know what
> you guys recommend?
>
http://spamassassin.apache.org/
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
Seriously.
There are a couple of books on SA, but they go out of date very quickly.
You're much better o
Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> We're converting a server from per user mysql bayes to sitewide bayes
> using the "bayes_sql_override_username USERNAME" command. We want to use
> the data for one username in the mysql db already that has quite a nice
> buildup of trained ham and spam.
>
> Can we simply
Magnus Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a script that runs every night with sa-learn to learn new ham/spam
> messages for every user.
> I do this with running these commands
>
> /usr/bin/sa-learn --ham --no-sync -u {$_array['sa_user']} {$_dir['inbox']}
> /usr/bin/sa-learn --ham --no-sync -u {$_ar
Jason Frisvold wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Quick question. Is it possible to set up spamassassin to use Bayes
> only if the -u option is passed via spamc? I'm using simscan to call
> spamassassin and if the user is not specified, it falls back to the
> nobody account. The bayesian database fills up wi
micah wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:54:05 -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Micah Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> SELECT count(*)
>>>FROM bayes_token
>>> WHERE id = '4'
>>> AND ('1190846660' - atime) > '345600';
>> Who the hell wrote *tha
Dave Koontz wrote:
> Theo and all. I know this topic comes up on occasion, but I am not sure
> I've ever seen an explanation as to why the bayes_seen file is not auto
> pruned along with the bayes db file. Since tokens expire in the main DB
> file, what is the purpose of having a seen file to unl
pennywise wrote:
> Hello together!
>
> I ´ve got following problem with my spamassassin which I couldn´t solve.
> When I use
>
> su vscan -c '/usr/local/bin/sa-learn -D --force-expire --sync'
>
> I got this error message:
>
> [72597] dbg: bayes: token_expiration: SQL error: Deadlock fo
The users lists is not really an appropriate place to advertise your
spam/virus filtering business.
Please do not feed the trolls.
Thanks
Michael
Please do not feed the trolls.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> < so whenever one uses a ^ or $ in a pattern, one is almost obliged to
> < append a /m flag, otherwise one risks being at a mercy of malicious
> < senders... Depending on a situation, this can be a security risk.
>
> Sure wish Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf would mention all t
Richard Hobbs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could the size of "bayes_seen" and "bayes_toks" be causing this timeout?
>
No, those aren't really that big, but it does look like you have an
expiration problem.
To solve your immediate problem you could just turn off bayes, that will
get mail flowing again an
Skip Brott wrote:
> I haven't yet had to implement any pdf plugins, but I am looking to do so.
> I am running SA 3.1.9 and perl 5.8.8. From what I can see, my plugins are
> here:
>
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/
>
> And there is no related folder for 5.8.8
>
> Is that the l
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> IMO, if people find this a useful enough feature of 3.2, it's a relatively
> trivial change in the code as I recall, so a bugzilla request to backport
> may get somewhere for a future 3.1 release.
>
I would +1 a backport.
Michael
Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:43 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:27:36PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>>> So what's the best fix for this? Should one just freeze SA at an
>>> earlier version on a production server until this is fixed upstream? Is
>
Duane Hill wrote:
>
> header L_TO_ME ToCc =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> describe L_TO_ME Email addressed to me
> score L_TO_ME 0.010
>
You can't do rules with SQL user prefs, not even with allow_user_rules.
Only non-admin config options are allowed.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been upgrading several stable servers running 3.1.8 for months
> without any issues to 3.1.20, and got a problem in one of them. When
> trying to restart spamd, I get this:
>
> @4000463ee4f622539324 [5532] error: check: no loaded plugin
> implements '
Graham Murray wrote:
> I am using spamassassin 3.2.0 and Postgresql 8.2.4 for bayes and awl.
>
> I am seeing several messages from Postgresql like the following
>
> spamd[18408]: WARNING: nonstandard use of \\ in a string literal
> spamd[18408]: LINE 1: select
> put_tokens(1,'{"003272\\\
Anders Norrbring wrote:
>
> I just ran into a big problem..
>
> [25735] warn: bayes: database version is different than we understand
> (3), aborting! at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm
> line 136
Double check your config for your database, make sure it
Maciej Friedel wrote:
> I can't make sa-compile because
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# spamassassin --lint
> [23577] warn: Couldn't get Connecting IP header X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP for
> message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, skipping greylisting call
> [23577] warn: rules: failed to run CG_FUJI_JPG test, skipping:
Steven W. Orr wrote:
> What I've currently been using is this script:
>
> #! /bin/bash
> exec tee >(mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]) | sa-learn --spam
>
> Is there an advantage to using -r over what I have? (something like)
> exec tee >(spamassassin -r) | sa-learn
>
-r will also perform the sa-learn po
There is a bug in the 3.1 ArchiveIterator code that causes things to
hang on msgs that are too large or too small. This got fixed in the 3.2
code, probably needs to be back ported. Feel free to open up a bug.
Thanks
Michael
Larry Nedry wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to use mass-check to test
Apache GSoC wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2007
It already has several ideas for possible projects, but don't feel
limited by our list, make up your own proposal if you would like.
Thanks
Michael Parker
of something from here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WeLoveVolunteers
that you would like to work on, feel free to add it to the list and
submit an application.
Thanks
Michael Parker
here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WeLoveVolunteers
that you would like to work on, feel free to add it to the list and
submit an application.
Last year we were able to take on several projects, its a nice way to
earn 4500 USD over the summer.
Thanks
Michael Parker
Michael Monnerie wrote:
>> Either a) you have something goofed up there or b) something is
>> goofed in how we setup the INC path for plugins.
>
> Something must have changed that breaks DBIPlugin, because at 3.1.7
> I don't have that error.
>
Please file a bug in Bugzilla. It might be somethi
Chris wrote:
> On Monday 19 February 2007 6:06 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 05:50:27PM -0600, Chris wrote:
>>> This was the output of my sa-update cronjob this morning:
>>>
>>> Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DBI::dbi called
>>> at /etc/mail/spamassassin/D
Dave Koontz wrote:
> I am sure this has been asked numerous times before, but what is the logic
> in having auto expiry on the bayes DB, and not seen? Seems that once tokens
> have been removed from the DB there is little to no use for 'unlearning' any
> associated messages. Besides on a busy sys
Sam Przyswa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to export a Bayes DB from a server and then append (not
> restore) it to others servers ?
>
No, you generally can't combine two bayes databases that way. Best bet
is to pick the most complete one and use it.
For more details see a really long post on
Kim Christensen wrote:
> * Jorge Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 23:48:52 -0500]:
>
>> Hi.
>> I got a question about this parameter, the spamassassin documentation
>> tells this:
>>
>> 1) Current default query:
>>SELECT preference, value FROM _TABLE_ WHERE username = _USERNAME_
>> OR u
Jorge Cardona wrote:
> Hi.
> I got a question about this parameter, the spamassassin documentation
> tells this:
>
> 1) Current default query:
>SELECT preference, value FROM _TABLE_ WHERE username = _USERNAME_
> OR username = '@GLOBAL' ORDER BY username ASC
>
> 2) Use global and then domain l
Tom Allison wrote:
> [1174] dbg: bayes: using username: tallison
> [1174] dbg: bayes: unable to connect to database: missing "=" after
> "bayes:192.168.0.100:5432" in connection info string
>
>
> bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::PgSQL
> bayes_sql_dsn DBI:Pg:bayes:192.168.0.
Fred T wrote:
> Hello users,
>
> I'm getting ready for the mass-check run for rescoring 3.2 and I'm
> seeing an awful lot of messages like:
>
> bayes: cannot open bayes databases
> /cygdrive/E/Temp/spamassassin-trunk/masses/spam
> assassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
>
> Being on
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin.html#item_bayes_learn
>
> Thanks!
>
>> by the way, a nice, working plugin that does this would be quite useful
>
> Since it was so straight-forward I made a small plugin that col
Stuart Robinson wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 01:54:07AM -0800, Stuart Robinson wrote:
>>> I've searched around a bit, both on gmane and Google, but I haven't found
>>> much more information regarding your two points. What IS stored in the
>>> token field of the table bayes_tok
Geoff Soper wrote:
> I've recently moved from calling spamassasin to using spamc/spamd. Today
> I had a "/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd restart" fail with the message "Unknown
> option: a". Googling this led me to the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin and
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd files, both of which specified t
Big Wave Dave wrote:
> On 1/3/07, Gary V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >It finally finished the restore.
>> >
>> >For the sake of information to help future users
>> >
>> >The "backup" file being used to restore into the new SQL database was
>> >99MB and took 17hrs to import on my AMD 1.2Ghz ma
Big Wave Dave wrote:
>
>
> What am I missing?
>
> I'd be thankful for any input.
You're not missing anything. The import takes a long time to run. Its
doing a lot of updates which are expensive in SQL. The good news is
that you can pretty much use the system while its doing the import
becaus
snowcrash+spamassassin wrote:
> i'm interested in using sqlite across my 'entire' mail server env.
> currently, exim+dovecot+spamassassin.
>
> i know sqlite _can_ be used for bayes db in sa. lots of info on that.
>
> any reasons it should NOT be used?
>
> i'm guessing performance, compared to d
Jose Javier Sianes Ruiz wrote:
> Now I’m studding the possibility to build a very large Bayesian database.
> Due to a huge amount of user I got (over 100,000 and possibly doubled next
> year, with 8MB of Bayesian information each one on theirs Maildirs), I have
> discarded use MySQL or PostgreSQL,
Gert Horne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some help.
>
> I am trying to configure spamassassin to read my user defined rules.
>
> I want to be able to block messages based on body and subject rules
> defined in a mysql table
>
> My debug output state that spamassassin is working fine with mysql
>
>
C. Bensend wrote:
>> Ahh but you didn't run the command I asked you to run. You are passing
>> the user: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to SpamAssassin so it will use that as
>> the key for the database, running the command from the command like that
>> way is going to use your unix id as the key. I'm guessin
C. Bensend wrote:
>> I think its just a slightly confusing message. If you run:
>> sa-learn -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Does it show that you have 200 ham and 200 spam in the database? If so
>> then there is a problem, if not you just need to train it some more.
>>
>> What the WARNING is telling y
C. Bensend wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
>I'm finishing up a mailserver upgrade this weekend, and I notice
> that my new SQL-based install isn't picking up on user-based Bayes
> data. This is on a new, squeaky-clean OpenBSD 4.0-STABLE machine
> running on AMD64, using SpamAssassin 3.1.7 with perl 5.8
Gary V wrote:
>
> I was curious about a couple settngs that I heard can affect performance
> when using Innodb so I did a few ad hoc tests:
>
> http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/mysqlspeed.txt
>
> http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/09/29/what-to-tune-in-mysql-server-after-installation/
>
Dan Bongert wrote:
> I'm in the process of converting my Bayes DB setup from in users' home
> directories (since I'm setting up a separate SpamAssassin server, and
> accessing Bayes via NFS is causing insane amounts of I/O).
>
> After a bunch of fiddling, I have a MySQL server set up properly, tab
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> No answer to this?
>
> Is this the wrong list to ask code details?
I thought I saw an answer to this alreadymaybe I was mistaken.
>
> Thanks,
>
> giampaolo
>
> From: Giampaolo Tomassoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> What is $self->_userid in seen_put() and the
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> I was perusing the man pages for spamd in spamassassin 3.1.7, and came
> across something that seems to imply that I can use spamc to tell spamd
> to update a sitewide bayesian database:
>
> -l, --allow-tell
> Allow learning and forgetting (to a local Bayes databa
Email Lists wrote:
>
> Personally, I would make it stand out in a different yet better way... it
> isn't like I didn't look for it for 15 minutes and I quit being "stupid"
> years ago...
>
> Or so I thought ;-)
>
Its a WIKI!!! Make it better!!
Michael
Howdy,
This year ApacheCon will be held in Austin, Texas.
http://www.us.apachecon.com/index.html
In addition to all of the other Apache Software Foundation related talks
there will be at least two SpamAssassin talks:
High Performance Apache SpamAssassin
Extending Apache SpamAssassin Using Plug
Tim Rosmus wrote:
> I've been running multiple in/out servers using Bayes and the local
> Bayes DB storage on the local machine[s]. Now I am moving Bayes
> to a site wide SQL setup. My question is on the sa-learn backup/
> restore from DB to SQL...
>
> Should I backup/restore all local machine
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> I'll put on my flameproof underwear for this
>
> There's been a huge amount of crossfire on these/this subject, but I
> don't see how it has anything to do with SA; or am I missing the
> point?
>
> Different protocols, yet another level of policing, but nothing about
>
Randall Perry wrote:
> I recently updated to the latest SA and at the same time converted bayes
> from file db to PostgreSQL.
>
> I notice that using sa-learn with SQL now is very slow compared to file db.
> Is this normal, and is accessing the db while scanning mail any slower with
> SQL?
>
>
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Samstag, 24. Juni 2006 02:30 Michael Parker wrote:
>> Add --debug dbiplugin to your starup command line.
>
> Sorry I checked that already, but forgot to post it:
> # spamd -D dbiplugin -q -c -l -r /var/run/spamd.pid --min-children=2
> --max-chil
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Dienstag, 20. Juni 2006 18:09 Michael Parker wrote:
>> You're pointed at the wrong DBI.pm. I updated the wiki to make it
>> more obvious.
>
> It's running now, but I can't see caching to happen. Below some
> log lines. Any ideas
Michael Monnerie wrote:
>
> I would say the docs are not correct, at least to one who is not
> specialist in configuring DBI. I found the info on the DBI man page,
> but still the docs here are wrong.
You are not reading completely, especially the part that says:
"For an example of connection
1 - 100 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
