On Nov 30, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Wes wrote:
Well, spamd is apparently doing things far more efficiently than "sa-
learn
--restore". Tokens are loading into the DB much faster than the
restore,
and postmaster is hardly ever a blip in 'top' (at least so far). When
running the restore, postmaster was sitting up about 60-80% CPU
constantly.
Learning normally can take advantage of inserting/updating tokens in
batches. When doing a restore it has to insert each token separately.
BTW, while the best effort was put into the postgresql support, I'm
sure it could use help so if anyone wants to hack on it and submit
patches I'm certain that the developers would be more than happy to
take a look.
Michael
