On 9/20/05, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What may be wrong here ?> Thanks in advance for any advice.> JCLooks like amavisd was trying to decompress a possible lha file and failed forsome reason. Perhaps amavis is passing lha the wrong path.
I know a lot of tools like amavis will use ex
Hi!
I'm currently testing RHEL4 + SA 3.0.4 + amavisd-new + Postgrey +
Postfix. While running amavisd in 'sa-debug' mode, whenever I send a
mail with a binary file I receive the following message:
LHa: Warning: Checksum error (LHarc file?) Inappropriate ioctl for device
What may be wrong here ?
On 5/27/05, aecioneto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >2 hours is better than an hour and a half?
> > >
> > >{O,o} (Yes, I know that you were free to do other stuff while "on
> > >hold" with SpamAssassin. The numbers just sort of tickled me.)
> >
> >
Hi there,
Any idea how many 'commerci
On 5/5/05, Ronnie Tartar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We run a descent sized datacenter. The problem I have is that someone sent
> out a spam with our abuse email address as the reply to.
>
> I have added an spf record to the dns now to try and reduce the forged
> headers problem. Any other sugg
Greetings SA admins,
I'm planning to deploy SA in a couple of weeks, I've been testing SA
3.02 (Debian distro) during the last weeks and it works very well but
I'm a bit concerned about the the memory leaks reported here.
My question is, should I wait till SA 3.1 is released or just install
3.0.3
