ed securely.
One activity rejects attempts to send email pretending to be 'on the
inside' and the other rejects to send email pretending to be 'on the
outside' thus preventing much of what has been discussed ...
>
> check_sender_access = hash:/etc/postfix/reject_from_my_doma
usually miss it.
Quit sending HTML email. It's very annoying, and if marketing professors
are right, for every ONE person that complains, there are probably 20+
others who say nothing.
---
Karl Pearson
ka...@ourldsfamily.com
Owner/Administrator of the sites at
http://ourldsfamily.com
---
&quo
er."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
> <https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
>
> If your happiness depends on what somebody else does, I guess you do
> have a problem.
>
y uses FreeBSD?
>
> Geeze
>
>
> Ted Mittelstaedt
>
Right, and why I've been using Redhat and Fedora for going on 2 decadess
now as mail/web servers, not to mention desktop and laptop OSes for
going on 8 years. Nothing free is worth a cent. Why can't everyone just
unde
st and joe-jobbed me. Worse
>> still, the mail matches this, rule:
>>
>> -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at
>> http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust
>
> You might consider changing that to:
>
> score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -0.001
> score RCVD_IN_DNS
elist1.com
>>> whitelist_from *...@whitelist2.com
>>> whitelist_from *...@whitelist3.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Why do you have the required_score 100 in there?
>>
>> That could prevent your blacklists from working 100% of the time.
>>
>>
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Chris Arnold wrote:
We use zimbra OSS on SLES10 SP1. Zimbra has spamassassin built-in. At the
present time, my mailbox is filled with backscatter; getting around 10 a
minute since 4:30 today. I have postfix backscatter rules in postfix of
zimbra, http://www.postfix.org/BAC
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Fri, October 10, 2008 17:05, Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
any email with a FROM as coming from our domain but is not a user (left
of @ sign) that isn't one of these X addresses?
On 10.10.08 21:01, Benny Pedersen wrote:
what rule gives -
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Everyone should block/defer ALL email with no reverse DNS. Then maybe
those email admins would get a clue.
AOL.com does just that.
No, they don't, really. They 'may' do that (see below). Try it.
Effective immediately: AOL
220- may
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:44 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Ken A wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I don't know how this will work but I'm building the data now. For those
of you who are familiar with Day old bread lists to detect new doma
Excellent points. I'm glad I'm not a 'common user'...
KLP
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Jesse Stroik wrote:
Karl,
Ease of setup and use are not the primary reason for purchasing any
product, IMO.
Yes, but you aren't the common user. Many commercial products *must* have
oversimplified setups if
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, fchan wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I don't have experience with this product.
I do have limited experience with Barracuda Networks appliance and I think is
a great product for an e-mail filter which I had experienced with my friend
to set up on their network & email server. It is easy
12 matches
Mail list logo
