Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details

2007-07-03 Thread Jonathan Allen
List and [EMAIL PROTECTED], > First off sorry for the problem and to any from the country of Poland > that were offended by this. I need to apologise to the nice chap at cobatco - I really didn't mean to cause you any embarassment on the public list, but I didn't think I could reach you any other

Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details

2007-07-03 Thread Jonathan Allen
SM, > > Where on earth did this response come from ? > > The response came from the mail server for cobatco.com. They have a > user subscribed to this mailing list. Yes: [EMAIL PROTECTED], to whom I was trying to respond. But I worded my question badly - what I meant was: why on earth should

Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details

2007-07-03 Thread Jonathan Allen
All, I just tried to reply to a kind soul that had offered some help with the 3.2.1 root errors and got: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (reason: 554 : Client host rejected: Polish Spammer) - Transcript of session follows - ..

Errors in CPAN test

2007-07-03 Thread Jonathan Allen
Hi List, So what's with 3.2.1 ? I'm running 3.1.8 and did the standard: cpan Mail::SpamAssassin and got: t/spamc_optCFAILED tests 2, 4, 6, 8 Failed 4/9 tests, 55.56% okay t/spamc_optLFAILED tests 1-16 Failed 16/16 tests, 0.00% okay t/spamd_all

Re: AWL Skyrockets Address Into Spamosphere

2007-06-28 Thread Jonathan Allen
Adam, > This seems to be something to do with the huge AWL files we had - I've > scheduled a weekly run of the trim_whitelist script (I had problems > getting check_whitelist to process the broken file) and I've not seen > the problem since. As a bonus, the AWL files are now tens of megabytes,

Re: Text::Wrap warn

2006-11-02 Thread Jonathan Allen
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:56:39AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TextWrapError Can you tell me, since I am not a perl guru, how to downgrade this module ? Jonathan

Re: Broken Dependency

2006-09-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Theo, > There's nothing broken. The message is informational, not an error. (it means > you don't have the DCC plugin loaded which would define that rule, which is > fine if you're not using DCC...) Thank you for explaining that. I have been trying to work out why some spams made it through SA

Broken Dependency

2006-09-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Hi All, I'm running 3.1.5 in FC2 and have a broken dependency. Any ideas how to fix it ? meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK' Jonathan

Re: Strange Error Log ...

2006-08-18 Thread Jonathan Allen
Theo, > It's an issue with Text::Wrap. A ticket was opened with them on CPAN, but > here's the best line: > > "The problem comes from an unintended use of a feature." > - http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=20657 Thank you for that. Having started checking the log, I now find

Strange Error Log ...

2006-08-18 Thread Jonathan Allen
Hi All, I have this strange error report that turns up in /var/log/messages: [spamd] (?:(?<=[\s,]))* matches null string many times in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/\G(?:(?<=[\s,]))* <-- HERE \Z/ at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/Text/Wrap.pm line 46. This is a vanilla (but up-to-date) 3.1.4 w

Re: FuzzyOcr mailing list

2006-08-17 Thread Jonathan Allen
Chris, > I just felt like I am annoying some people here that aren't > interested in this because more and more people keep writing to the > mailing list about it with, sometimes, trivial problems or requests, I have learned several other things in the process, so I felt that the whole experience

Re: FuzzyOcr mailing list

2006-08-17 Thread Jonathan Allen
Chris wrote: > because I feel that the spamassassin mailing list shouldn't be > spammed/bothered with further help requests to install FuzzyOcr or to > solve problems with it, I created a mailing list for it (and possibly > other small tools that I write). It will definetly be a low traffic > list

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Jonathan Allen wrote on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:00:42 +: > > > Any ideas about the Perl modules that don't load - Net::Ident for example > > Did you install it? I know it's a problem to install it via CPAN, AFAIR it > throws errors. Do yo

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Matt Kettler wrote: > That looks like DNS is working, so your RBL checks should be working. > > Are you sure you're not seeing any messages hit RCVD_IN_XBL, RCVD_IN_SBL, > RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, and the like? Since I adjusted the TrustPath issue (thanks to Daryl), I haven't had any incoming SPAM

Re: How to debug spamassassin.

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Matt Kettler wrote: > Jonathan Allen wrote: > > Installing Net::Ident says: > >t/0use.. > > Net::Ident::_export_hooks() called too early to check prototype at > > /root/.cpan/build/Net-Ident-1.20/blib/lib/Net/Ident.pm line 29. > > I wouldn&

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > Check out http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath before Matt > beats you into submission. ;) That appears to have done the trick. I have defined my network and my ISP's delivery array as trusted and I got SPAMCOP and other RBL errors on a spam I had saved.

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Kai, > That doesn't mean it's not working. Then let me try and rephrase my remarks: > Check if you have any hits from SBL rules I am now getting no hits from any SBL rules whereas I was getting several hundred a day. This sort of email is now coming into the user email boxes. > SA doesn't do

Re: How to debug spamassassin.

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Patrick Sneyers wrote: > http://razor.sourceforge.net/ > Razor2::Client::Agent is not on Cpan. Install it manually. > Start with razor-agents-sdk, which installs dependencies... Thank you - this is now installed and shows as loaded during the diagnostic output. Does it need to be explicitly told

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Matt Kettler wrote: > Try adding a -D to that command line, you'll get general debugging, which > should report on the state of the DNS modules, if it thinks DNS is working > (based on doing some simple MX lookups), etc. In the output I got: [18501] dbg: dns: testing resolver nameservers: 158.152

Re: How to debug spamassassin.

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Jim Knuth wrote: > spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 |more Thanks - that has been really useful. I noticed that in the list of modules mine says: [18501] dbg: diag: module not installed: LWP::UserAgent ('require' failed) [18501] dbg: diag: module not installed: HTTP::Date ('require' failed) so

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-12 Thread Jonathan Allen
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > If you installed one of their RPMs I think that the > /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin config file will probably have included "-L" > in it, so if starting with their included rc script you'll only be using > local tests. If this is the case just remove the "-L" from t

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-12 Thread Jonathan Allen
Matt Kettler wrote: > Jonathan Allen wrote: > > I used to have SA 3.1.0 working with the Spamcop and SBL-type checks > > working just fine on my old mail-server (RH6, don't ask) but its > > hardware died and I am now trying to get it reworking on a Fedora > > Core

How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-12 Thread Jonathan Allen
Hi All, I used to have SA 3.1.0 working with the Spamcop and SBL-type checks working just fine on my old mail-server (RH6, don't ask) but its hardware died and I am now trying to get it reworking on a Fedora Core 2 machine. SA was downloaded and installed from CPAN and seems to work in almost eve