> > Jon Dossey wrote:
> > > I'm sure a lot of us have a similar setup, linux/bsd mx gateways
> > > (running SA) relaying mail to Exchange, and Outlook clients. I'm
just
> > > curious how everyone handles learning?
> > >
> > > It seem
I'm sure a lot of us have a similar setup, linux/bsd mx gateways
(running SA) relaying mail to Exchange, and Outlook clients. I'm just
curious how everyone handles learning?
It seems like a lot of people recommend a public folder for users to
dump spam in, but how do you get it back out into a
> Matt Kettler wrote:
> > At 08:32 AM 6/9/2005, Ronan McGlue wrote:
> >
> >> anyclues as to why SA isnt 'apparently' using the hosts file??
> >
> >
> > This is because SA doesn't use the system resolver, it uses
Net::DNS's
> > resolver. This gives SA a lot of control over queries, but doesn't
take
> pardon my complete unix ignorance, I have been trying to figure
> out how to get debug output to a file so I can go back and look
> at it. I also want to look at the marked up email w/ report so
> I am using this:
>
> spamassassin -D -t < test2.txt > test2.out
>
> How could I also redirect the
ange server on the LAN.
Don't forget to re-make the mailertable file:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail]# makemap hash mailertable.db < mailertable
Hopefully I understood your problem correctly :)
Thanks,
Jon Dossey
DELTA HEALTH GROUP
> From: Menno van Bennekom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: David Velásquez Restrepo
> Subject: Re: Simple question TRUE or FALSE (More data to answer this
> question)
>
> > Q) With spamassassin (and all the above info) you need about 20 to 30
> > seconds per email message and LOTS of RAM and CPU:
> From: Thomas Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: spamassassin-users
> Subject: RE: [SOLVED] Re: Suddenly load average of 15-18???
>
> On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 11:46 -0500, Jon Dossey wrote:
> > > From: Thomas Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent
> From: Thomas Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:38 AM
> To: spamassassin-users; spamass-milt-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: [SOLVED] Re: Suddenly load average of 15-18???
>
> OK, this is a weird solution... I rebooted the server and all the
> problems went away. It
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Jon Dossey wrote:
>
> > > Sounds like a spamass-milter bug... have you checked their site:
> > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=spamass-milt
> >
> > I don't think it's a milter problem, because the messages are b
> Jon Dossey wrote:
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> Jon Dossey wrote:
> >>>> Still having problems.
> >>>>
> >>>> Redhat FC2, sendmail 8.31.1, spamassassin 3.0.1 (with
> >>>> spamass-milter).
> >>>&
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 5:04 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Spamassassin Tagging
>
> Jon Dossey wrote:
> >> Still having problems.
> >>
> &g
> Still having problems.
>
> Redhat FC2, sendmail 8.31.1, spamassassin 3.0.1 (with spamass-milter).
>
> Messages are coming in with scores > 5.0 and aren't being tagged.
>
> Here's my local.cf:
> #
> required_score 5
> rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
> report_safe 1
> trusted_networks 10.1
> # loc
Still having problems.
Redhat FC2, sendmail 8.31.1, spamassassin 3.0.1 (with spamass-milter).
Messages are coming in with scores > 5.0 and aren't being tagged.
Here's my local.cf:
#
required_score 5
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
report_safe 1
trusted_networks 10.1
# lock_method flock
score
> At 01:08 PM 3/2/2005, you wrote:
>
> >Can anyone confirm that it should only have one parameter?
>
> Yup, the manual can.. :)
>
>
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Con
f.
> html
>
> > I can't image why it would have two?
>
> A mistake when someone (not to
> At 11:25 AM 3/2/2005, Jon Dossey wrote:
> >I apologize, I was in a rush. System is redhat fc2, sendmail 8.13.1,
> >spamassassin 3.0.1 and spamass-milter 0.2.0 (updated for SA 3.0,
haven't
> >switched to 0.3.0 yet).
> >
> >Here's (most
I apologize, I was in a rush. System is redhat fc2, sendmail 8.13.1,
spamassassin 3.0.1 and spamass-milter 0.2.0 (updated for SA 3.0, haven't
switched to 0.3.0 yet).
Here's (most of) my /home/spamd/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
# SpamAssassin user preferences file. See 'perldoc
Mail::SpamAssassin
It scored a 5.8 out of a required 5.0, but the message wasn't tagged.
Any ideas why?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "VB LOTTERY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WINNER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: BANK GIRO LOTTERJ WINNING ANNOUNCEMENT
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:28:01 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Conte
> Scott Wertz wrote:
> > I think this is an easy question, but I haven't been able to find an
> > answer. If I'm using spamassassin 3, invoking it via procmail as
just
> > 'spamassassin' and testing for the result, and I trust that any
message
> > carrying a URL that's listed on surbl.org or spam
> Two months ago when we tried upgrading one of our production
mailservers
> to
> SA v3 we had a complete disaster - numerous processes spawning, heavy
load
> factors, high memory usage. I was wondering whether now that SA 3.02
has
> been released whether it is now time to try the upgrade again.
> --On Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:43 AM -0500 Matt Kettler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd start off simple...
> >
> > spamassassin --lint -D
> >
> > See what that can tell you. If that's showing network tests working,
try
> > adding -D to spamd's start up (note: spamd not spam
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 5:01:32 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 2:43:48 PM, Jon Dossey wrote:
>
> >> As per Matthew Romanek's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) recommendations, I
> >> re-pointed my resolver to a different nameserver (fr
As per Matthew Romanek's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) recommendations, I
re-pointed my resolver to a different nameserver (from resolving
locally), and can successfully scan a message in a little under 2.5
seconds (2.3 - 2.4 seconds).
I already upgraded to perl 5.8.5 and Net::DNS 0.48, which didn't reso
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:27:29AM -0600, Jon Dossey wrote:
> > > Wow! 0.1 seconds, now that's fast!
> > >
> > > Then I saw this: "tests=none"
> > >
> > > I guess it would be fast if it doesn't have to really *do*
anythi
> FYI (and for future list-searchers), the problem with URIDNSBL
> appearing to work but not actually scoring was because the host's
> resolv.conf included 127.0.0.1, which apparently something doesn't
> like.
I find it pretty hard to believe it couldn't resolve off itself. Have
you checked your
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:27:29AM -0600, Jon Dossey wrote:
> > Wow! 0.1 seconds, now that's fast!
> >
> > Then I saw this: "tests=none"
> >
> > I guess it would be fast if it doesn't have to really *do* anything!
>
> tests=none jus
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:11:26AM -0600, Jon Dossey wrote:
> > Machine is a nameserver (bind 9.3.0), load average 0.00 0.00 0.00
(test
> > machine, not in production). I tried changing skip_rbl_checks to 1,
and
> > testing again. Took 15.1 seconds to process.
&
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:47:02AM -0600, Jon Dossey wrote:
> > Dec 6 09:25:30 dhgsrv17 spamd[1781]: clean message (0.1/5.0) for
> > root:500 in 15.2 seconds, 1531 bytes.
> >
> > Any idea why its taking so long? Running an older version of
> > spamassassi
Redhat FC2, spamassassin-3.0.1, spamass-milter 0.2.0
This is a Compaq DL360 (Dual 1.3ghz Xeon with 1GB of RAM, 36.4 U320 scsi
raid 0+1).
Dec 6 09:25:30 dhgsrv17 spamd[1781]: clean message (0.1/5.0) for
root:500 in 15.2 seconds, 1531 bytes.
15.2 seconds to scan a message that simply contained:
Setup: Redhat FC2, sendmail 8.13.1, spamassassin 3.0.1, and
spamass-milter 0.2.0
Error: Nov 23 11:21:45 hostname spamd[3966]: Can't unlink
/var/run/spamd.socket: Permission denied
Here's the info on the socket:
srw-rw-rw- 1 spamd root0 Nov 23 11:21 spamd.socket
And worth noting:
spam
ks again for your help everyone. I appreciate all your suggestions.
> Have fun!
>
> Kris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Dossey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 8:59 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Spamassassin on a
Me again - FC2, sendmail 8.13.1, spamassassin 3.0.1 (via spamass-milter
0.2.0)
I've got two e-mail gateways running this configuration (more or less).
Is there any way to keep the Bayesian databases synchronized between the
two of them? I'm trying to maintain as much redundancy as possible. I
k
pletely generic redhat fc2 box).
Are those my only real options?
Thanks,
Jon Dossey
DELTA HEALTH GROUP
__
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may
32 matches
Mail list logo
