Re: ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

that method doesn't work so well. > > --John > >> Thanks for the info. >> >> I fixed that Received line, by removing the line wrap, and it was no >> longer ALL_TRUSTED. >> >> Now that I know what the issue is, I just need to figure out why the

Re: ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

d to figure out why the > header is getting munged. > > Thanks, > John > >> John T. Yocum wrote: >>> Thanks. I tried adding the /32 to the end, but that didn't have an >>> effect. >>> I did run the headers through spamassassin -D and got

Re: ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

Thanks for the info. I fixed that Received line, by removing the line wrap, and it was no longer ALL_TRUSTED. Now that I know what the issue is, I just need to figure out why the header is getting munged. Thanks, John > John T. Yocum wrote: >> Thanks. I tried adding the /32 to the

Re: ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

ta: X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted: Thus, it was tagged as ALL_TRUSTED. What is really odd, is this only happens to direct delivered mail, any message relayed via another host, doesn't get the ALL_TRUSTED flag. Thanks, John > mouss wrote: >> John T. Yocum wrote: >> >>> Hello,

Re: ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

ail box, thus nobody relays through it, except itself. Thus, it shouldn't trust any hosts other than itself. Now, it doesn't set ALL_TRUSTED from spam, or any e-mail which is relayed via another host. It's only for direct delivered mail. Thanks, John > On 7/24/05, John T. Yoc

ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

;; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:35:28 -0700 Received: (qmail 43718 invoked by uid 399); 24 Jul 2005 21:35:24 - Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.102.220?) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 21:35:24 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 20