box today.
On 5/27/2014 2:09 PM, John Goubeaux wrote:
> Can anyone shed some light on what might be happening -or not
> happening - with sa-update and my install, I am continually getting
> an "exiting with code 1" when sa-update is run. Full -D output
> pasted at the
Can anyone shed some light on what might be happening -or not happening
- with sa-update and my install, I am continually getting an
"exiting with code 1" when sa-update is run. Full -D output pasted at
the very bottom.
/usr/local/bin> ./spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.4.0
runn
cript "/etc/rc3.d/S78spamd" exited with return code 1.
--
John Goubeaux
Systems Administrator
Gevirtz Graduate School of Education
UC Santa Barbara
Phelps Hall 3534
805 893-8190
65929
mail.error] write(MTA socket,49): Broken pipe
Nov 7 15:48:10 kady.education.ucsb.edu dccifd[14514]: [ID 465929
mail.error] write(MTA socket,53): Broken pipe
Nov 7 15:48:12 kady.education.ucsb.edu dccifd[14514]: [ID 465929
mail.error] write(MTA socket,65): Broken pipe
-john
--
John Gou
#x27;ucsb.edu'
[5035] dbg: dns: A records for 'ucsb.edu': 128.111.24.40
[5035] dbg: received-header: 'by' ucsb.edu has public IP 128.111.24.40
[5035] dbg: received-header: relay 85.176.21.159 trusted? no internal? no
Bob Proulx wrote:
John Goubeaux wrote:
This shoul
sts on the hop right before 128.111.24.40
Thanks !
-john
--
John Goubeaux
Systems Administrator
Gevirtz Graduate School of Education
UC Santa Barbara
Phelps Hall 3534
805 893-8190
e {
die "prefork: ordered child to accept, but child reported state
'$state'";
}
}
}
--
John Goubeaux
Systems Administrator
Gevirtz Graduate School of Education
UC Santa Barbara
Phelps Hall 3534
805 893-8190
-john
At 2:17 PM -0400 10/6/06, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
In Long.pm, go to line 91 and change this
my $tmp = `hostname` . '.' . `domainname`;
to this
my $tmph = `hostname`;
my $tmpd = `domainname`;
my $tmp = "$tmph.$tmpd";
-Original Me
clues are appreciated ! -john
--
John Goubeaux
Systems Administrator
Gevirtz Graduate School of Education
UC Santa Barbara
Phelps Hall 3534
805 893-8190
bayes_toks.expire28117
-rw--- 1 spamdother1138688 Sep 26 09:17 bayes_toks.expire3403
-rw--- 1 spamdother 598016 Sep 26 09:42 bayes_toks.expire465
-rw--- 1 spamdother1204224 Sep 26 08:22 bayes_toks.expire7931
--
John Goubeaux
Systems Administrator
Gevirtz
use all sare rules yet many spams are passing thru' last few days.
Now 2 questions, what is that error for and what more can I do for
spam?
The teachers are sick of spam since last few days.
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
John Goubeaux
Systems Administrator
Gevirt
/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exis
ts
Sep 21 17:31:48 kady spamd[25513]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/export/home/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exis
ts
--
John Goubeaux
Systems Administrator
Gevirtz Graduate School of Education
UC Santa Barbara
Phelps
release ? ie 2.64 >> 3.15
-john
--
John Goubeaux
Systems Administrator
Gevirtz Graduate School of Education
UC Santa Barbara
Phelps Hall 3534
805 893-8190
light on the situation that might have been
helpful to educate and inform their management and or supervisors
as to what they are up against as well as a bench mark to compare
what they are actually successfully doing right now.
Any ideas comments are appreciated!
Thanks -john
--
John
into these questions is much appreciated.
-john
-rw--- 1 spamdstaff 65536 Jun 16 09:51 auto-whitelist.dir
-rw--- 1 spamdstaff536366080 Jun 16 09:51 auto-whitelist.pag
--
John Goubeaux
Systems Administrator
Gevirtz Graduate School of Education
UC Santa Barbara
Phelps Hal
Folks,
I am running SpamAssassin version 2.64 on a production system running in
a site wide configuration, ie no per user settings. My AWL db file has
gotten quite large (500+mb)and while I am not seeing any performance
issues that are necessarily related to this I was wondering about a
coupl
Upgrade question 2.64 > 3.1.0
Can anyone shed some light on a basic upgrade question:
I am upgrading from a 2.64 version to 3.10 I have AWL running
(site wide) and am unclear how the upgrade will handle the existing
auto-whitelist.pag file? In fact it looks like by default the new
version
Upgrade question 2.64 > 3.1.0
Can anyone shed some light on a basic upgrade question:
I am upgrading from a 2.64 version to 3.10 I have AWL running
(site wide) and am unclear how the upgrade will handle the existing
auto-whitelist.pag file?
I also understand that 3.1.0 handles AWL in a sligh
18 matches
Mail list logo