Re: Is pyzor recommended by folks on this list?

2021-04-12 Thread John Capo
sed then - what do you believe *is* the purpose of pyzor? I think the OP is confused as to what a pyzor listing means. A pyzor or DCC listing along with other badness will add a point or two in our scoring system depending on what the badness is. IMO using pyzor or DCC as a spam indicator is a bad idea. John Capo

Re: Are these valid email headers?

2020-12-05 Thread John Capo
29 Nov 2009 > 00:17:08 + Except for mailid: I see those headers in mail from Facebook. Anyone can add Facebook headers to a message. John Capo

Re: What can one do abut outlook.com?

2020-10-25 Thread John Capo
his urls unlisted ? > > i see low scooring spams aswell, and i add it to local rules to stop it Spamassassin rules and scores from the Bogofilter bayes classifier works well against the kind of spam that I see from Outlook. I would think that the bayes classifier in Spamassassin would work well also. John Capo

Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The NEW invaluement 'Service Provider DNSBLs' - 1st one for Sendgrid-spams!

2020-08-26 Thread John Capo
On Tue, August 25, 2020 23:07, Rob McEwen wrote: > Thanks, John Capo, for the suggestions! Honestly, I'm at the end of my rope - > completely burned > out from creating this - desperately needing to catch up in other areas of my > business so that I > can pay my bills. And I

Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The NEW invaluement "Service Provider DNSBLs" - 1st one for Sendgrid-spams!

2020-08-25 Thread John Capo
your Postfix directory postfix reload John Capo Tuffmail.com

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-18 Thread John Capo
On Sun, March 17, 2019 22:57, James wrote: > On 2019-03-17 5:46 p.m., John Capo wrote: > >> On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote: >> >>> I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the >>> "required" number. >>&g

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread John Capo
On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote: > I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the > "required" number. > > > About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. What is the Bayes score for the missed spam? > I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes. Unless you

Patch: txrep_ipv4_mask_len ignored

2018-12-01 Thread John Capo
With the correct sender address this time :( --- /usr/local/src/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.2/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/TxRep.pm 2018-12-01 12:19:53.067968000 -0500 +++ /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/TxRep.pm 2018-12-01 12:23:42.183385000 -0500 @@ -1739,7 +1739,7