On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:26:54 -0400
> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Dianne Skoll
>> > you should not have to pay for delisting one IP.
>> and with BN you are NOT paying for a delistin
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> you should not have to pay for delisting one IP.
and with BN you are NOT paying for a delisting.You are paying for
the upfront ID validation and verification process that goes into
fast-tracking your email flow. If you don't want that f
> I appear to be getting a shakedown scam from Barracuda Networks.
You are not being shaken down, but you might be slandering. ;-)
I'm fairly certain that BN isn't making much profit off of your $20.
What they are getting is your commitment, and your ID, that one or
more IP addrs under your cont
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Updates were broken by two issues. 1st, there is a bug in svn with files
> with spaces with mod svn. I introduced a file with a space while preparing
> the 3.4.1 release.
Forgive me if this sounds incendiary, it's not meant to be.At wh
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Axb wrote:
>
> Many moons ago, obviously before you started using SA, what you *now*
> consider "dynamic", was very static with less than than handfull of changes
> /release.
There's some pointless blabber in that as well. ;-)
Irregardless of last century's hist
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 2/10/2015 9:13 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>>
>> I would guess I missed the cutoff for yesterday's masscheck and tomorrow's
>> will include it.
>
> Rule gen just finished and the update does include the fix if you want to
> confirm.
L
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 2/10/2015 9:00 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Kevin A. McGrail
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/9/2015 4:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>>
>>>> what
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 2/9/2015 4:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> what is that below introduced with tonights update and get triggered now
>> for every single mail and why does such things not automatically get caught
>> before push?
>
> It was part of a com
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I guess the $64K question is, does the new rule that's version dependent
> Increase the "spam catch" Because if it does, then I don't regard it as a
> problem. Instead, I want it!
The real $64K question is: If you really want it (in yo
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Anyone else seen this in v3.4.0?
>
> sa-learn --dump magic
> Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 530) line 2.
> Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 1023) line
> 2.
Last
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Steve Bergman wrote:
>> I suggest you join the SDLU list where you can discuss anti spam
>> philosophy.
>>
>
> Thanks. I suggest that you consult for an ISP-dependent business someday.
> ;-)
>
> It's an education, too.
>
> -Steve
Just a heads-up... that sort of b
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 6/9/2014 2:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>>
>> On 6/9/2014 1:23 PM, Patrick Domack wrote:
>>>
Comparing my list of new domains, shows that DOB seems to pick them up
after they ar
On Apr 30, 2014 5:09 AM, "Tom Hendrikx" wrote:
>
> On 04/30/2014 11:00 AM, Axb wrote:
> > On 04/30/2014 10:30 AM, Michael Storz wrote:
> >> Am 2014-04-30 10:23, schrieb Axb:
> >>> On 04/30/2014 10:10 AM, Michael Storz wrote:
> Are there any plans for a DMARC plugin for SpamAssassin? Reacting
On May 7, 2013 1:01 PM, "Joe Acquisto-j4" wrote:
>
> >>>> Jim Popovitch 05/07/13 12:13 PM >>>
> >On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4
wrote:
> >>
> >> What I did not get was why my attempts to clarify whatever offense
&g
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>
> What I did not get was why my attempts to clarify whatever offense
> was taken were met by reject messages.
Quite simply put, Benny Pedersen wants you to respect his
signature, which reads:
senders that put my email into body conten
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> spamass-milter also supports "--socket", so it is not limited to only spamc.
And... that is wrong. Anything passed to spamass-milter after "--"
(i.e. --socket=...) is passed on to spamc.
-Jim P.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Dave Funk wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>>> Am 22.03.2013 22:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
are spamass-milter using spamc ?
>>
>>
>> On 23.03.13 00:34, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>
>>> at my knowledge
>>> spamass-milter uses
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
> OT but related
>
> I just got a bunch of phishing attacks against a bank come through.
> Following the link leads me to some owned website with the fake bank
> frontend - and it had a feature that I've seen time and time again:
> images and lin
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 13:55, wrote:
>
> Normally rules get updated every day, via sa-update. They weren't
> for the last couple months due to a clock on a server being set wrong:
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6671
Interesting. In my mind, it's a short walk from
out
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 21:46, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:25:25 +
> Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
>
>> Very well. DNSMasq setup and running local, yet still returns HI
>
> AFAIK DNSMasq isn't a recursive nameserver, it's just a DNS forwarder.
Correct.
pdns_resolver is an excellent replacem
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 13:51, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>
>> On 10/19, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>>
>>> Is the missing entity one person, several people, many people? Was
>>> there an untimely death? I b
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:26, wrote:
> On 10/05, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 17:41, RW wrote:
>> > The usual reason for a hiatus is that too much spam or ham has aged-out
>> > in the corpora, and a top-up is needed.
>
> I think it's mo
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:15, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
>
> Why Google name server returns an incorrect value?
Because sometimes the Google name servers overload the upstream system
and get blocked. The same thing happens if you use the Level 3
servers (4.2.2.x). You would be better served by ins
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 17:41, RW wrote:
> The usual reason for a hiatus is that too much spam or ham has aged-out
> in the corpora, and a top-up is needed.
So, how do we get it top-up'ed?
-Jim P.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 09:39, Michael Scheidell
wrote:
> On 10/4/11 3:07 AM, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it me or has it been a long time since there has been an update to the
>> spamassassin ruleset?
>>
>>
> what is 'long'?
Since 27-Aug-2011 ?
$ ll /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/up
25 matches
Mail list logo
