On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Many moons ago, obviously before you started using SA, what you *now* > consider "dynamic", was very static with less than than handfull of changes > /release.
There's some pointless blabber in that as well. ;-) Irregardless of last century's history, what Reindl said makes good sense. Highly dynamic content shouldn't have to be exported in a .pm from svn every month. -Jim P.
