mouss wrote:
The approach is flawed. a single word shouldn't be enough to tag mail as
spam.
As a general rule, yes 100% agree...but to play devil's advocate for a
second, I slam any message that contains references to a little blue
pill starting with "V" and sounding like a play on Niagara Fa
Matt Kettler wrote:
James Gray wrote:
Sorbs sux, don't use it. Last time we had this problem they wanted
money (and not an insignificant amount either) to remove a listing
from their systems. They arbitrarily add addresses to a database the
IP's owner can't control, then
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25.03.08 07:57, James Gray wrote:
Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that it's
practically useless
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I don't find it useless
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:31:34 am mouss wrote:
while you are at it, fix your DNS. your domain has been succesfully
submitted to rfci (boguxms):
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=gray.net.au
On 26.03.08 11:30, James Gray wrote:
Yes - that'
mouss wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
James Gray writes:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:09:47 pm D Hill wrote:
Now your confusing the subject. The previous response you made was
from:
From: James Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Now you are using:
From: James Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:59:19 pm mouss wrote:
> James Gray wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:31:34 am mouss wrote:
> >> James Gray wrote:
> >>> Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
> >>> SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic li
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:09:47 pm D Hill wrote:
> Now your confusing the subject. The previous response you made was from:
>
> From: James Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Now you are using:
>
>From: James Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> BOTH of those dom
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:32 am D Hill wrote:
> Actually, closer inspection shows your:
>
> ns2.viperplatform.net.au
>
> is still reporting back:
>
> smtp.mas.viperplatform.net.au
You're assuming gray.net.au and the viperplatform.net.au domains are the
same...they're not. If you query MY D
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:31:34 am mouss wrote:
> James Gray wrote:
> > Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
> > SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that
> > it's practically useless and if you are an unfortunate w
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:31:34 am mouss wrote:
> James Gray wrote:
> > Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
> > SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that
> > it's practically useless and if you are an unfortunate w
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25.03.08 07:57, James Gray wrote:
Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that it's
practically useless
I don't find it useless. It works quite well
Unless y
Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that it's
practically useless and if you are an unfortunate who ends up
incorrectly listed in it, good luck getting off it! Case at hand, the
company I work for purch
12 matches
Mail list logo
