Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, James Butler wrote:
>> . Gibberish in the form is just a probe.
>
> My experience has been that the gibberish gets around simplistic tests
> for 'empty' fields. That's why I advocate the use of a field that
> *
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 1/29/2010 12:44 PM, te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
>>
>> Really, I was just trying to figure out what the point would be for
>> someone to fill out the form with obviously invalid data.
>>
>
> My guess is that it's a spammer's bot looking for a broken web form to
> abuse.
>
M
laying the Klingons) on the mainframe side. The game
ended up being installed on HP calculators, where it undoubtedly played
better than during our mainframe sessions. Talk about network latency!
Fire a photon torpedo and wait about 5 minutes to find out if you hit
anything. Good times. Sorry about the sidetrack ... carry on!
James Butler
Oh yes ... there's no denying its complexity. But the desire to use
one's native tongue is quite simple.
James Butler
Pete McNeil wrote:
> James Butler wrote:
>> We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
>> domain names over the past seve
We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
domain names over the past several years. Don't underestimate the
backlash against everything being in English for so long ... there are
hordes (sorry) of folks who want to be able to use their native
charactersets.
Ja
James Butler wrote:
> System: Fedora 10, Spamassassin 3.2.5, Perl 5.10.0
>
> The following error is preceded by log entry:
> spamc[PID]: skipped message, greater than max message size (512000 bytes)
>
> Error: spamc[PID]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned different
> (there
System: Fedora 10, Spamassassin 3.2.5, Perl 5.10.0
The following error is preceded by log entry:
spamc[PID]: skipped message, greater than max message size (512000 bytes)
Error: spamc[PID]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned different
(there are as many of those errors as it takes to reach the f
ages that
are similar in content to the ones that caused the condition in the first place.
James Butler
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
Chairman of the Board
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 10/28/08 at 1:29 PM Corbie Mitleid/Fire Through Spirit wrote:
>
I stand corrected. I guess I should have said that *I* don't use SpamAssassin
for outgoing email. :)
James Butler
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
Chairman of the Board
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 10/28/08 at 12:32 PM Larry Nedry wrote:
>On 10/
oblem.
This issue is probably unrelated to the discussions found on this list, and we
would require data that you are unlikely able to provide, so continuing to ask
users here will likely only increase your frustration.
James Butler
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
Chairman
>qsch wrote:
>> Hi I am using cpanel and I was wondering how to configure my email which
>is
>> horde to sent email marked as spam into spam folder. I am not sure if I
>have
>> to use and create a filter. I tried it but it didn't work. Thank You
>>
>If no one here's able to answer you, you may want
Unbelievably, I haven't gotten any stock spams since that last one! I'll reply
with the SA headers when I get another one ... yeesh. Thanks for the reply,
tho'.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/1/06 at 2:49 PM Evan Platt wrote:
>At 02:44 PM 12/1/2006, you wrote:
>>I've got a simp
I've got a simple rule that checks for "favorite financial institution site" in
the message body. I've assigned that rule a default score of 10.0, however when
the message arrives in my spam trap, the SA score is 7.5, high enough to get it
into the spam trap, but clearly below 10.0.
What's up w
Holding the position of "most widely-attacked" is no reason for it to also be
"least secure-due-to-widely-known-and-poorly-corrected-issues". Even if
Apple/Posix products were as "widely attacked" as Windows products, the results
would be far less damaging to the global infrastructure, despite P
Just trying to help ...
Sincerest regards,
James Butler
Chairman, Board of Directors
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
California, USA
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/2/06 at 4:15 PM Ken A wrote:
>jdow wrote:
>> From: "Ken A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
nd a couple he
came into the project with, re: Microsoft). We can presume that his "masters"
include the almighty dollar and low-hanging fruit.
Oops ... I may be a fsking idiot ... sorry.
Sincerest regards,
James Butler
Chairman, Board of Directors
Internet Society - Los A
LOL! Thanks for the reminder. Best of luck in your efforts to "stop SPAM"
around the world.
Sincerest regards,
James Butler
Chairman, Board of Directors
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
California, USA
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/1/06 at 11:29 PM jdow w
On 7/21/06 at 3:04 PM Evan Platt wrote:
>At 03:01 PM 7/21/2006, you wrote:
>>Hey guys, the Apache email system is hosed.
>>
>>It has bounced two recent emails, one because it supposedly already had
>>list headers on it, which as it went out of here it did not. The other
>>had the system's spamassa
Hi.
I'm getting Snort alerts that describe "Attempted specific command buffer
overflow: MAIL FROM:, 346 chars" via this list. The typical message contains a
software pitch included in the headers like this:
begin
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local p
Eliminating spam is not really an option unless you are willing to toss out
anything valuable that SA might catch by accident. The plan is to *manage* spam.
We pipe spam to a separate mailbox just for that purpose, and then check that
mailbox every so often to (a) loosen rules that are catching
20 matches
Mail list logo
