I experimented with pyzor and set these in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, after installing pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
pyzor_options --homedir /etc/spamassassin
I've since commented them out and discontinued the experiment. I
assumed that would be the end of pyzor bei
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
[...]
Harry wrote:
>>How is it all found by procmail?
Matus UHLAR responded:
> exactly as you use above. It also does not matter if you use pyzor, all
> checks SA uses are evaluated that way.
>
> Simply install pyzor (razor, dcc, ...), activate SA plugins and let
Having a heck of a time googling for this answer.
I'm looking to understand the actual mechanism whereby pyzor tells sa
it thinks a message is spam.
What does sa look for.
My sa setup allows sa to insert X-Spam headers and then procmail looks
for certain of those
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0
Bart Schaefer writes:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I've been trying to `teach' SA to spam from ham in my mail system.
>>
>> I've made it thru two main learning sessions where I ran around 450
>> msgs (each time) thru sa-le
I've been trying to `teach' SA to spam from ham in my mail system.
I've made it thru two main learning sessions where I ran around 450
msgs (each time) thru sa-learn spam/ham and yet SA is still incapable
of getting it right more than about 40 % or maybe less. Not sure how
to figure that out very
RW writes:
> On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:19:12 -0400
> Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
>> I assumed it had something to do with rounding or something so I
>> increased the score to 4.1 to get that message to break the spam level
>> of 5.
>>
>> Now the same mail shows
Bart Schaefer writes:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>
>> 1) Does it matter that I have autolearn turned off in spamassassin
>> conf filt 'local.cf' while doing my sandbox work
>
> No, it doesn't. In fact it's probabl
Harry Putnam writes:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>
>> On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>>How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
>>>all messages rather than just the spam messages?
>>>
>>>I have `
SA is letting mail thru as ham that should be spam apparently based on
what is too low a score (for my mail) for URIBL_JP_SURBL which was
1.9 by default.
I pushed it up to 4.
But then I see a report that shows a total score of 4.9 when
4.0 is shown for URIBL_JP_SURBL
1.0 is shown for SPF_SOFTFA
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
>>all messages rather than just the spam messages?
>>
>>I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to
How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
all messages rather than just the spam messages?
I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
Report header for spam msgs.
Thomas Harold writes:
> On 9/13/2013 9:01 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Kris Deugau writes:
>>
>>> From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf:
>>>
>>> report_safe 0
>>
>> Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths
>> a
Kris Deugau writes:
> From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf:
>
> report_safe 0
Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths
ago, and of course, forgot to uncomment.
I vaguely remember being able to tell SA, maybe in the local.cf file
or something, not to attach messages like this:
,
| [-- Attachment #1 --]
| [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit, Size: 1.7K --]
|
| Spam detection software, running on the system "reader.local.lan", has
| identified this in
snowybunting writes:
Harry wrote:
>> sa-learn --spam spammail
>> Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined)
>>
>> Is this normal output or does it mean just what it appears to, that
>> nothing was done?
>>
>> The file is mbox format, at least 'mutt -f spam' reads it fine.
>>
>>
Using spamassassin 3.3.2 on debian linux (testing)
I haven't tried teaching spamassasin spam from ham by hand before but
looking thru the docs I guess something like:
sa-learn --spam spammail (Where spammail is mbox style file)
is supposed to be teaching Sa that those messages are spam.
But,
than an old version, but
>
> On 10/15, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> trusted_networks 192.168.0.
> I don't think that was ever necessary, I think 192.168.0.* is included in
> SA's default guesses if you don't specify a trusted_networks. But I guess
> that's not
I found a version of local.cf from a good while back. About a year
and just wanted to see if anyone sees something in it that would be
incompatible or just wrong for current versions of SA.
Its a bit much to ask since its still 96 lines even with all comments
and blank lines removed. But still i
I've been thinking about using bayes in learning mode, but I want to
do it without disturbing my current mail setup.
I thought I might (using procmail) channel a copy of all incoming mail
through spamassassin with bayes learning turned on.
I'd want bayes learning off in the main mail setup. So
Setup: Single user Linux Desktop, and home Family lan
Running: Gentoo Linux (kernel-2.6.33)
sendmail-8.14
procmail-3.22
spamassassin-3.3.1
Mail and News reader: emacs/gnus (emacs is version 24)
---- ---=---
"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nothing of note "short circuits" any of the SpamAssassin tests. They all
> have to be evaluated because a positive or negative score might get over-
> ridden by subsequent processing. Suppose you had a whitelist entry that
> forgot and sent you a message in Spa
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, that particular subject looks to only contain ordinary ascii.
> Can't hit any CHARSET rules when there's no charachter set to hit.
I hadn't understood it was based on a charset being stipulated.
> Are you using ok_languages as well?
My Mail::Spam
Running spamassassin-3.1.0
I have `ok_locales en' set in local.cf. I had hoped that would cut
down on the amount of processing SA has to do, but I see messages with
a subject line like this:
Subject: Replicas dos melhores relogios
That still grind thru lots of processing and never did hit the
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> running spamassassin-3.1.0
>>
>> I hoped to filter messages on the basis of non-english subject line so
>> went looking in the files spama uses. I see something about FOREIGN
>> language b
running spamassassin-3.1.0
I hoped to filter messages on the basis of non-english subject line so
went looking in the files spama uses. I see something about FOREIGN
language but then it dawned on me, being horribly colloquial, not to
mention near illiterate, how FOREIGN is totally subjective.
F
Where is the info about how to keep spama from encapsulating and just
have it modify headers with its own insertions.
I've scanned Mail::Spamassassin::Conf
But did not see that sort of stuff coverd there
Is there a piece of documentation devoted specifically to using bayes
in SA? I'm a long time SA user but have always avoided the bayes
angle because it always seems too complicated to learn to use.
[Possible duplicate Alert... Posted on gmane a few days ago but did
not appear on my server... now posted direct to list]
Running SA 3.0.2
I may be just missunderstanding something here, if so I hope someone
will help me straighten out my flawed view of how this works.
I pull down mail from an
28 matches
Mail list logo
