dar...@chaosreigns.com writes: Thanks for the helpful input... well appreciated here.
> You should be able to just load it up in a current version of SA and see if > it throws any errors. > > There's nothing that pops out at me as more problematic for the current > version than an old version, but.... > > On 10/15, Harry Putnam wrote: >> trusted_networks 192.168.0. > I don't think that was ever necessary, I think 192.168.0.* is included in > SA's default guesses if you don't specify a trusted_networks. But I guess > that's not documented, and I don't feel like checking the code for it at > the moment. Not a problem anyway. Will declaring it like that limit the guessing and just set that one as trusted? >> skip_rbl_checks 1 >> dns_available no > Disabling network checks causes spamassassin to be wrong 5 times as often. Point taken... that may have been done under circumstances where bandwidth was a problem... I do recall having some trouble like that some time ago. I'm going to enable both now, after hearing your reasoning, and see how it goes. Thanks.
