On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> There is no such blacklist. Bayes is a statistical method to determine
> how good or bad (spam) a mail is, by dissecting the email into tokens
> (words) and taking into account how often each word has been used in
> good email or spam be
; password back.)
No, I'm using ordinary SA.
--
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial
http://linux2.arinet.org
1:41am up 8:05, 2.6.16.13-4-default GNU/Linux
Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org
pgpfBOT0O1kL0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
01mdk
spamassassin-spamd-3.0.4-0.1.101mdk
spamassassin-spamc-3.0.4-0.1.101mdk
Can someone help me how to upgrade it? Should I (forced) remove all previous
SA?
Thank you very much,
--
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial
http://linux2.arinet.org
5:46pm up 0:11, 2
:)
--
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | http://linux2.arinet.org
06:40:00 up 1:32, Mandrakelinux release 10.1 (Official) for i586
public key: https://www.arinet.org/fajar-pub.key
ham as ham. Let the statistics deal with the
> overlap. By trying to avoid training "spamish" ham or "hamish" spam you're
> just doing your training a big disservice by making it unrealistic.
Thanks Matt,
So talking statistically, does it mean I have to train SA abo
Hi all,
Greetings. I've just joined the list.
I've been using sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2
One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to teach SA on a very long spam
such as the stock report spam? Will it cause many False Positive?
Thanks
--
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Lin
