Re: Sending spam forwarded by backup MX directly to primary server spam folder

2017-11-17 Thread Davide Marchi
Hi friends, confirm that setting "report_safe 0" on backup MX, does what I asked, and that is, it allows the main server to move messages marked as spam in the relative directory, as the following logs show: SERVER BACKUP MX: Nov 14 17:51:07 server2 spamd[4728]: spamd: connection from local

Re: Sending spam forwarded by backup MX directly to primary server spam folder

2017-11-13 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-11-13 11:01 Matus UHLAR - fantomas ha scritto: [.] this is your problem: your backup MX packs spam to a non-spam mail set report_safe 0 on backup MX Well, I've set "report_safe 0" on backup MX, Now I verify what happens ;-) Very very thanks for your help. You had already hinted at thi

Re: Sending spam forwarded by backup MX directly to primary server spam folder

2017-11-09 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-11-07 10:10 Matus UHLAR - fantomas ha scritto: [..] Thus, messages received from the world will be scored locally, messages received from backup MX will be scored on backup MX. Then, your sieve filter will work as expected. [..] Well, but could I make a Sieve filter that put to (prima

Re: Sending spam forwarded by backup MX directly to primary server spam folder

2017-11-06 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-11-05 16:26 Matus UHLAR - fantomas ha scritto: [..] Is there any method to tell "primary server spamassassin" automatically move spam (forwarded by backup MX) to (primary) spam folder? SA does NOT move mail, it only scores mail. ..sorry, I expressed myself badly However, you ca

Re: Sending spam forwarded by backup MX directly to primary server spam folder

2017-11-04 Thread Davide Marchi
Matus UHLAR - fantomas ha scritto: [..] sieve does not work on backup MX, since sieve runs at delivery time which does not happen on backup MX (unless you hack it to) Well Actually the backup MX server when mark an email as spam simply forward to primary and this is exactly how backup MX

Sending spam forwarded by backup MX directly to primary server spam folder

2017-11-02 Thread Davide Marchi
Hi Friends, on Debian Jessie environment, using spamass-milter 0.3.2-1 and spamassassin 3.4.0-6, I would like to make sure that automatically all messages marked as spam and forwarded by the backup server mx to the primary server, the (primary server) sieve filter moves them to the spam folder.

Re: Increasing spam level for MX backup server?

2017-10-03 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-10-02 18:13 Noel ha scritto: [..] DKIM will stop forged senders in your domain, but it won't stop mail to a random recipient in your domain. Each server *must* have a list of valid recipients.  The secondary MX will use relay_recipients_maps for this. You can still use postscreen indepe

Re: Increasing spam level for MX backup server?

2017-10-02 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-09-28 18:41 Noel ha scritto: [..] First, [...] If the two hosts aren't physically close -- on the same switch -- this just isn't practical. Eh, my two VPS are in two different geographic locations. This spoils everything Secondly, [..]And if the postscreen cache is on the primary an

Re: Increasing spam level for MX backup server?

2017-10-02 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-09-28 16:48 Reindl Harald ha scritto: [..] no, you have both the same machine, frankly you do nothing else than add the IP aof the backup-mx to the box and tell postscreen with "postscreen_whitelist_interfaces" which one is *always* a 450 response OK there is no "primary MX down" -

Re: Increasing spam level for MX backup server?

2017-09-28 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-09-27 18:40 Reindl Harald ha scritto: it's trivial, just give the primary MX the IP auf the backup-MX as alias and if you are at it enable "postscreen_dnsbl_sites" and "postscreen_greet_action" - after that your smtpd process only faces a few percent of all spam at all I've read from

Re: Increasing spam level for MX backup server?

2017-09-27 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-09-25 10:17 Lucio Chiappetti ha scritto: [..] (*) which does not mean SA is useless, as it was demonstrated recently when an OS upgrade temporarily disabled amavisd (which is what triggers spamassassin) and the SA-filtered spam came through. As an order of magnitude, graylisting filters

Re: Increasing spam level for MX backup server?

2017-09-27 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-09-25 00:12 David Jones ha scritto: [..] If you do this, then you need to make sure the secondary servers are setup identically to the primary to filter identically. the two setup are identically. As mentioned above, just use them in an active/active way like smtp.ena.net. If this

Re: Increasing spam level for MX backup server?

2017-09-27 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-09-24 20:09 Matus UHLAR - fantomas ha scritto: On 22.09.17 18:19, Davide Marchi wrote: On Debian Jessie, Postfix 2.11.3 and Spamassassin 3.4.0-6, I've just setup an MX email backup server and now I realize that new spam come from the MX backup server.. Is there any way to te

Re: Increasing spam level for MX backup server?

2017-09-24 Thread Davide Marchi
Am 22.09.2017 um 18:19 schrieb Davide Marchi: Hi friends, On Debian Jessie, Postfix 2.11.3 and Spamassassin 3.4.0-6, I've just setup an MX email backup server and now I realize that new spam come from the MX backup server.. Is there any way to tell to reject any mail coming to the MX b

Increasing spam level for MX backup server?

2017-09-22 Thread Davide Marchi
Hi friends, On Debian Jessie, Postfix 2.11.3 and Spamassassin 3.4.0-6, I've just setup an MX email backup server and now I realize that new spam come from the MX backup server.. Is there any way to tell to reject any mail coming to the MX backup server, if the primary server is up? And again, m