Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "John Hardin" : On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, David Michaels wrote: header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ micha...@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu header __GK__PHARMS_02 Subject =~ /PHARMA|PHARMACY/ meta TR_GK__PHARMS (__GK_PHARMS_01 && __GK_PHARMS_02) I'm still not matching Count the u

Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "John Wilcock" : Le 22/06/2010 17:09, David Michaels a écrit : I don't mean to be stupid.. and I know that this should be done with sieve but.. Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? I think it's the "To" thats messing up..

Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "John Hardin" : On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, David Michaels wrote: Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ micha...@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu That looks insufficiently punctuated. Try: header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ /michae...@ucrwcu\.rwc\.uc\

Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "Bowie Bailey" : David Michaels wrote: I don't mean to be stupid.. and I know that this should be done with sieve but.. Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? I think it's the "To" thats messing up.. header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =

Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "John Wilcock" : Le 22/06/2010 17:09, David Michaels a écrit : I don't mean to be stupid.. and I know that this should be done with sieve but.. Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? I think it's the "To" thats messing up..

header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
I don't mean to be stupid.. and I know that this should be done with sieve but.. Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? I think it's the "To" thats messing up.. header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ micha...@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu header __GK__PHARMS_02 Subject =~ /PHARMA|PHARMACY/ meta TR_GK__PH

Re: Performance problem body tests

2010-06-02 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "Helmut Schneider" : Hi, with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance problem: [/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint < /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and is no longer s

Re: Unable to telnet port 783

2010-04-19 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "Kaleb Hosie" : I'm trying to setup SpamAssassin so that I can use a program called SpamAssassin Coach. This program is a plugin for MS Outlook that allows remote reporting to bayes and lets you mark an email as spam or ham. This is what is in my /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin file:

Re: Trouble after upgrade

2010-01-26 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "john ffitch" : After attempting to move to Sa 3.3.0 water:~ # /etc/cron.daily/sa-update http: GET http://yerp.org/rules/stage/330903380.tar.gz request failed: 404 Not Found: 2.0//EN"> 404 Not Found Not Found The requested URL /rules/stage/330903380.tar.gz was not found on this

Re: spamassassin bug

2010-01-11 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "Rich Shepard" : On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote: In /etc/mail/spamassassin/rules/ I have init.pre, v310.pre, and v312.pre files. which would be a non-default location. Kai, Almost all SA-related files are in /etc/mail/spamassassin/; that's where the Slackware package in

Re: spamassassin bug

2010-01-11 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "Rich Shepard" : On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Warren Togami wrote: Try wiping out /var/lib/spamassassin/*, does spamassassin work then? Warren, I don't have a spamassassin directory in /var/lib/. Rich Sorry but I must insert a smiley... :)

Re: Never ending spam flood www.viaXX.net?

2009-07-10 Thread David Michaels
Quoting "Terry Carmen" : Hi, Because of Apache.org spam filters I can't send here my message about spammers again: . . . http://pastebin.com/f6a83e9fb I'm new to this list, and may be missing something obvious, but this looks like a great candidate for a firewall "DROP" rule. Is there a

Re: Level 1 setting

2009-07-07 Thread David Michaels
Quoting davidcass : I have a webserver that is managed by an ISP. We have our spam assassin set on the highest (1). I am still getting daily spam that has sexual terminology in the header. The terminology is even spelled correctly. The provider is telling us that it should be expected. I am not