--As of January 17, 2015 4:20:36 PM -0700, Michael Williamson is alleged to
have said:
to both /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and
/home//.spamassassin/user_prefs,
I check the file permissions to be readable by all. I restart it
# service spamassassin restart
--As for the rest, it is mine.
--As of January 5, 2015 4:38:03 PM -0800, John Hardin is alleged to have
said:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 1/5/2015 4:13 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> You can avoid having to escape the slash (/) by using a different
> separator for the r
--As of November 4, 2014 10:39:56 AM -0800, motty cruz is alleged to have
said:
Hello, I would like to set BAYES_999=0.2 score higher than 0.2; I
searching for file but I can't find it in
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin (am using FreeBSD)
--As for the rest, it is mine.
Another poster alread
--As of October 27, 2014 8:29:52 PM +0100, Robert Schetterer is alleged to
have said:
by the way
http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34896/
always have a shellshock patched system these days with postfix/procmail
--As for the rest, it is mine.
Interesting. I dug a bit further out of curios
--As of October 25, 2014 12:45:31 AM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to
have said:
Am 25.10.2014 um 00:42 schrieb RW:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:31:51 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.10.2014 um 21:20 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:56 PM +0100 Martin Gregorie
--As of September 25, 2014 11:13:16 AM -0400, Deeztek Support is alleged to
have said:
You *did* keep your initial Bayes training corpora, right?
I have an account that I have used to sign up for everything under the
sun over the past 10 years. It's a goldmine for spam. I figured I use
that
--As of September 9, 2014 3:45:33 AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann is alleged
to have said:
This incidence is part of the initial round of IANA accepting generic
TLDs. There's hundreds in this wave, and some are abused early. This is
moonshine registration, nothing like new TLDs being accepted in
--As of August 25, 2014 7:49:39 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to have
said:
Am 25.08.2014 um 19:35 schrieb Daniel Staal:
--As of August 25, 2014 7:06:32 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to
have said:
masscheck ties to ensure spams score at least 5 points, but doesn't
care b
--As of August 25, 2014 7:06:32 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to have
said:
masscheck ties to ensure spams score at least 5 points, but doesn't
care beyond that
yes, but given that the intention is to flag message above
5 with [SPAM] and reject messages above 7 which is the
intention run
--As of August 25, 2014 4:00:15 AM +, Eric Wong is alleged to have said:
Daniel Staal wrote:
Good points, but inotify might still be overkill. `ls maildir/cur/
| grep ',.*S` will give you all messages that have been seen in the
mailbox, so you can run on a periodic schedule fairly e
--As of August 23, 2014 3:22:13 AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann is alleged
to have said:
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:32 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Isn't inotify a bit of overkill for this? If you have a dedicated
maildir for training, you know that anything in maildir/new is, uh,
new. So you pro
--As of August 15, 2014 1:23:37 PM +0200, Antony Stone is alleged to have
said:
On Friday 15 August 2014 at 13:05:26 (EU time), Timothy Murphy wrote:
1) What is the simplest way to reject mail in chinese, russian
and turkish?
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassi
--As of August 13, 2014 11:25:26 AM -0400, David F. Skoll is alleged to
have said:
I believe that unsubscribing is safe. If the list owner is legitimate,
unsubscribing will work. If the list owner is a spammer, he/she already
has your email address and I don't believe spammers track the valid
--As of August 11, 2014 10:00:34 AM -0400, David F. Skoll is alleged to
have said:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 06:45:24 -0700
"Andy" wrote:
If I'm sounding like a leech, that's because in this case I would very
much like to be. :o)
I have "fired" paying customers for behaving like you. It's even
--As of July 13, 2014 7:56:38 PM +0200, Antony Stone is alleged to have
said:
On Sunday 13 July 2014 at 19:52:57, Pat Traynor wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Antony Stone wrote:
> Have you been able to identify whether the "unsolicited mail" which has
> been thus detected is:
>
> - genuine email
--As of July 7, 2014 5:20:01 PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail is alleged to have
said:
On 7/7/2014 5:09 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Jul 7, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 7/7/2014 2:28 AM, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 05/07/2014 19:08, Philip Prindeville a écrit :
As for encoding a
--As of July 1, 2014 9:40:05 PM -0500, Steve Bergman is alleged to have
said:
95+% of the time, email is immediate, true.
More like 99%+ of the time. When it's not, I hear about it.
But it is not uncommon for
mail to be delayed for hours or days either,
It's uncommon enough that when it d
--As of July 1, 2014 7:39:43 PM -0500, Steve Bergman is alleged to have
said:
On 07/01/2014 05:07 PM, motty cruz wrote:
If it needs to be *instant*, have them visit a web page to enter service
requests.
Because there's not way that web-based email forms can be abused.
Please. The whole del
--As of June 20, 2014 2:05:04 PM +0100, Timothy Murphy is alleged to have
said:
On Thursday, June 19, 2014 11:52:59 PM Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Axb> Dovecot's Sieve is your friend. (replaces procmail)
Not really, not in this context. OP is using procmail merely as a LDA.
And in that capaci
I just wanted to say that my sa-update cronjob finally succeeded in
updating the rules tonight. Congrats and thanks to everyone who's been
working on getting the update server back up and running; it appears you've
succeeded. ;)
Daniel T. Staal
our updated mailsystem changed something.
So directly to you and may be somebody can post it,
if it's useful.
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Tom Robinson wrote:
...[errormessage]...
and Daniel Staal
...[tied split into four lines, which will work]...
Try changing
227 {printf "%s&quo
Got this off-list, might be helpful.
Forwarded Message
Date: June 13, 2014 9:22:21 PM +0200
From: "Christoph (Stucki) von Stuckrad"
To: Tom Robinson , Daniel Staal
Subject: Re: Bareword found where operator expected at
/usr/local/bin/sa-heatu line 22
--As of June 13, 2014 8:21:50 AM -0400, Joe Quinn is alleged to have said:
On 6/12/2014 10:27 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to bother you with this. As referenced on the ApacheSpamAssassin
Wiki for AutoWhiteList
(https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist) I downloaded the
Truxoft
--As of June 11, 2014 4:25:31 AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann is alleged to
have said:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:22 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of June 11, 2014 2:45:25 AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann is alleged
to have said:
> Worse, enabling charset normalization completely breaks UT
--As of June 11, 2014 2:45:25 AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann is alleged to
have said:
Worse, enabling charset normalization completely breaks UTF-8 chars
in the regex. At least in my ad-hoc --cf command line testing.
--As for the rest, it is mine.
This sounds like something where `use
--As of May 23, 2014 11:23:44 PM +0100, Martin Gregorie is alleged to have
said:
This morning SA 3.3.2 was working as expected on my SA test box when I
amended a rule to recognise a new spam variant. The test box is running
a fully patched (as of last Friday) copy of Fedora 20. Then I did my
no
--As of May 22, 2014 3:04:04 PM +0200, Tom Hendrikx is alleged to have said:
Hi,
After checking the results of sa-update and doing some manual dns
queries, it seems that last rule updates were done more than a month
ago. This used to be an almost daily process, even when there were only
score c
--As of April 20, 2014 12:14:37 PM -0700, Dan Mahoney, System Admin is
alleged to have said:
Most of my users aren't command-line friendly. I'd like to basically
have my IMAP server default to handing out two imap mailboxes that get
auto-crontabbed to training bayes.
Ideally, I'd also like to
--As of February 20, 2014 1:56:18 PM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail is alleged to
have said:
People have hard_coded BAYES_999 entries as well. I recommend
forwarding the announcement from John to the other mailing lists you are
aware of these discussions.
--As for the rest, it is mine.
I intend t
--As of February 20, 2014 9:23:56 AM -0800, John Hardin is alleged to have
said:
BAYES_99 is being reverted to its original definition and BAYES_999 is
being converted to an overlapping additive rule that adds some more
points to BAYES_99 for the very top end of Bayes score.
If you have locall
--As of February 17, 2014 2:54:11 PM +, RW is alleged to have said:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:09:33 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/17/2014 8:43 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> seems after last rule update we've got new rule BAYES_99 in
> 72_scores.cf but
> without score (an
--As of February 6, 2014 5:32:47 PM -0800, Dave Warren is alleged to have
said:
On 2014-02-06 17:17, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I've discussed it with Alex a bit but one of my next ideas for the
Rules QA process is the following:
- we measure and report o
--As of January 13, 2007 7:17:46 AM -0500, Dave Koontz is alleged to have
said:
Just a wild stab here, run a lint check on all your rules. I once fat
fingered a rule in my local.cf file and got similar hit results as you are
describing here.
--As for the rest, it is mine.
I fixed a couple o
--As of January 12, 2007 7:08:18 PM -0600, Shane Williams is alleged to
have said:
System is Darwin, running Postfix. The sign-up message for this list got
those rules triggered. (_Everything_ triggers them.)
This is just a guess, but is it possible that OS X's use of carriage
returns is ma
--As of January 12, 2007 12:40:00 PM -0800, John D. Hardin is alleged to
have said:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
I am scanning mail via a procmail recipe
Anything in that configuration that you can think of that would
mess up those headers? I can post a set if you would like.
I've got a problem where one of the message boards I was on has been
hijacked and taken over by spammers. They are sending out short
notifications of new board topics, all of which contain nothing but spam.
Bayes hits these, but at the moment nothing else is. They do have the nice
distingu
--As of September 28, 2006 11:05:35 AM -0700, Kelson is alleged to have
said:
Daniel Staal wrote:
Depends on the setup. For instance, given the explanations above, I'll
start a system to automatically learn from my 'checkspam' folder, but
not my 'highspam'
--As of September 30, 2006 12:32:41 PM -0500, Russ B. is alleged to have
said:
Basically, anything that arrives over 15 in score, will have that
SPAM-STATUS header embedded, so it does NOT run SpamAssassin on this
server, and just puts it in the Caught-Spam. If it has LOWER than a score
of 15 f
--As of September 27, 2006 5:43:28 PM -0700, Kelson is alleged to have said:
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
True. So... Optimal is obviously to train, once and correctly, on all
messages. Sending a message through that has been trained will consume
*some* resources, but less then one that still need
39 matches
Mail list logo
