Where is the user's user_prefs file supposed to live?
Mine is in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs, but it is ignored (presently
full of whitelist_rcvd entries that never fire). This is where it has been
since spamassassin 2.6.xxx
If I put all of those into /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf they actually
> >
> > Try putting those white-list statements in the global "local.cf" config
> > file (do a --lint check & what ever steps are necessary to restart SA so
> > that it will see the changes) and then test to see if the whitelist works.
>
> Done this in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
>
> waitin
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 06:46:18PM -0500, Dave Funk wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Chuck Campbell wrote:
>
> >I have SA set up and working (mostly) on my mail machine, however I've put
> >the
> >following into my user_prefs:
> >
> >whitelist_from *...@zy
I have SA set up and working (mostly) on my mail machine, however I've put the
following into my user_prefs:
whitelist_from *...@zyngamail.com
and
whitelist_from_rcvd *...@zyngamail.com zyngamail.com
and
whitelist_allows_relays *...@zyngamail.com
when email comes in from them it is flagged as sp
I'm sure this is a FAQ, but I didn't find it on the web page FAQ section.
Is there a "how to" for upgrading from 2.63 to present release (3.2.3)?
If not, please, some pointers on what to read to make this as painless as
possible.
As usual, thing have been working (reasonably), so I haven't consid
Is there any way to run both the old 2.6.4 SA and 3.0.3 in parallel on the same
machine?
If I rename the old spamassassin executable to, say sa-old, will it still work?
I want to switch, but will need to get Bayes up to speed before cutting over
to the newer version for production.
I guess I co
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 04:38:34PM -0600, Steve Bondy wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 04:13:44PM -0600, Steve Bondy wrote:
> > > I'm no expert on Bayes, but as far as I know, repeatedly
> > learning the
> > > same message over and over again doesn't do you any good. Once the
> > > to
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 04:13:44PM -0600, Steve Bondy wrote:
> I'm no expert on Bayes, but as far as I know, repeatedly learning the
> same message over and over again doesn't do you any good. Once the
> tokens are in there, that's it. The bayes score goes up as more tokens
> in the message match
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:56:43PM -0600, Steve Bondy wrote:
> Just because you learn something as spam doesn't mean it will be
> blocked.
> SA will add a score to the message based on the bayes rules, but if the
> bayes rules are the only ones that get hit, and they score less than
> your threshol
Lately I've been seeing lots of very similar spams get through my 2.6.3
I don't run autolearn, but I save my spam and ham daily, and run them through
sa-learn -spam and -ham respectively.
I'm puzzled why a spam I've manually learned via sa-learn keeps coming through.
What can I check to ensure th
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 05:03:34PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
>
> Stop using BigEvil if you're using SA 3 with network tests.
>
More efficiently? What if you are on a slow network connection? Should
you use the network tests?
-chuck
11 matches
Mail list logo
