On 07/21/08 14:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
Christopher Bort wrote:
In all of the relay attempts I'm seeing on this mail server, the
recipient addresses are in domains for which the server is an NS.
They are looking for any connection possible. A nameserver is an
associ
On 07/21/08 13:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mouss) wrote:
Christopher Bort wrote:
For a while now, I've been seeing attempts to send mail to the
home server for addresses in $DAYJOB domains. This is not a
problem since the volume is low and they are being properly
rejected as third-party
7;s all spam (the
sender addresses tend to support that). So, has anyone else seen
this sort of behavior and what could be the rationale for trying
to deliver mail to an NS like this?
--
Christopher Bort
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.thehundredacre.net/>
On 06/30/08 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matus UHLAR - fantomas) wrote:
On 30.06.08 09:55, Christopher Bort wrote:
Neither of the two messages at <http://pastebin.com/m76e8b461>
are bounce messages. They're both legitimate messages from the
CommuniGate Pro mailing list, yet th
Neither of the two messages at <http://pastebin.com/m76e8b461>
are bounce messages. They're both legitimate messages from the
CommuniGate Pro mailing list, yet they both hit
ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE and BOUNCE_MESSAGE. Comments?
--
Christopher Bort
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.thehundredacre.net/>
n. 8^)
--
Christopher Bort
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.thehundredacre.net/>
On 05/19/08 03:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote:
Christopher Bort writes:
On 05/17/08 01:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote:
Stefan Jakobs writes:
On Friday 16 May 2008 20:45, Christopher Bort wrote:
The message at <http://pastebin.com/m42c297fd>[1] hit
ANY_BOUNCE_M
On 05/17/08 01:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote:
> Stefan Jakobs writes:
> > On Friday 16 May 2008 20:45, Christopher Bort wrote:
> > > The message at <http://pastebin.com/m42c297fd>[1] hit
> > > ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE and BOUNCE_MESSAGE despite the
e that shows the original (bounced)
message was blocked by pastebin as spam, so I've posted just the
headers and body of the bounce message.
--
Christopher Bort
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.thehundredacre.net/>
On 02/04/08 16:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daryl C. W. O'Shea) wrote:
Christopher Bort wrote:
I have recently upgraded a SpamAssassin installation from
3.2.1 to 3.2.4. Since then URIBL hits have dropped to nearly
zero, where before there were several hundred per day.
Immediately after the up
I have recently upgraded a SpamAssassin installation from 3.2.1 to
3.2.4. Since then URIBL hits have dropped to nearly zero, where before
there were several hundred per day. Immediately after the upgrade, there
were a handful of hits on URIBL_BLACK, but I have not seen any at all in
the last fe
11 matches
Mail list logo
