On 07/21/08 13:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mouss) wrote:

Christopher Bort wrote:

For a while now, I've been seeing attempts to send mail to the home server for addresses in $DAYJOB domains. This is not a problem since the volume is low and they are being properly rejected as third-party relay attempts (authentication required - relay not permitted). However, the fact that someone is apparently trying to send mail to an NS instead of an existing MX has piqued my curiosity. It looks like it's all spam (the sender addresses tend to support that). So, has anyone else seen this sort of behavior and what could be the rationale for trying to deliver mail to an NS like this?

it's the same as port scans. they look for open relays. they don't
care if the host is an MX, an NS, a www or anything. they just connect
to the IP and try to relay. I've seen this on hosts that "nobody
should have known about".

But they don't seem to be randomly looking for any open relay. If they were just looking for open relays, wouldn't you expect to see domains in the recipient addresses that have no connection whatsoever with the target machine? In all of the relay attempts I'm seeing on this mail server, the recipient addresses are in domains for which the server is an NS. I don't see any relay attempts where that is not true which implies, I think, that they do care that it's an NS. It seems like they're looking for hosts that will deliver|relay messages for specific domains, so why don't they just use the existing MX rather than trying an NS host with which there's no reasonable expectation that it will relay for the target domain? I suppose they could be looking for back doors, but that seems like it would be a very low probability undertaking.

On the other hand, I also see attempts to connect to A hosts (thus
ignoring MX definitions) and to old MXes. This is different as there
is no relay attempt.

The RFCs allow for A hosts to be tried in the absence of MX records, so there is some rationale for that, however weak it may be.

--
Christopher Bort
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.thehundredacre.net/>

Reply via email to