On Monday 11 July 2005 15:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Chavdar Videff wrote on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:40:14 +0300:
> > If I got it right, we should run sa-learn for each user in order to
> > benefit from bayes. We intend to run a cron job for each user and do it
> > at night
On Monday 11 July 2005 14:50, JamesDR wrote:
> Chavdar Videff wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > Our mailserver server serves about 100 users. Our config:
> > Sendmail+Procmail+SpamAssassin.
> > The question is:
> > If I got it right, we should run sa-learn for
could we run simultaneously with our
setup.
All hints will be appreciated, for we scheduled an initial load for 16 users
of the big collection of spam received so far.
Thanks guys
Chavdar Videff
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 10:13, Loren Wilton wrote:
> The spam you show is difficult to handle. One important thing is there is
> no url or other link in the message body to a drug site where people could
> get the spammed product. I am assuking the original spam much have had
> such, since a spam
reState:
X-KMail-MDN-Sent:
At our rxdrug-site, you can choose top-selling rxmeds at a reduced prices.
Legitimate way to e-shoppe for tableets. We provide customers flexible and
reliable distribution services.
==
Regards
Chavdar Videff
hat can be
# tweaked.
#
###
#
# rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
# report_safe 1
# trusted_networks 10.50
# lock_method flock
required_hits 3
rewrite_subject 1
report_header 1
use_terse_report 1
defang_mime 0
report_safe 0
use_bayes 1
auto_learn 1
Regards
Chavdar Videff
